Advertisement

Unified gravitational and Yang-Mills fields

  • Dave PandresJr.
Article

Abstract

We unify the gravitational and Yang-Mills fields by extending the diffeomorphisms in (N=4+n)-dimensional space-time to a larger group, called the conservation group. This is the largest group of coordinate transformations under which conservation laws are covariant statements. We present two theories that are invariant under the conservation group. Both theories have field equations that imply the validity of Einstein's equations for general relativity with the stress-energy tensor of a non-Abelian Yang-Mills field (with massive quanta) and associated currents. Both provide a geometrical foundation for string theory and admit solutions that describe the direct product of a compactn-dimensional space and flat four-dimensional space-time. One of the theories requires that the cosmological constant shall vanish. The conservation group symmetry is so large that there is reason to believe the theories are finite or renormalizable.

Keywords

Field Theory General Relativity Quantum Field Theory String Theory Group Symmetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelquist, T., Chodos, A., and Freund, P. G. O. (1987).Modern Kaluza-Klein Theories, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, California.Google Scholar
  2. Davies, P. C. W., and Brown, J. R., eds. (1988).Superstrings: A Theory of Everything? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Dirac, P. A. M. (1930).The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Preface.Google Scholar
  4. Dirac, P. A. M. (1978).Directions in Physics, Wiley, New York, p. 41.Google Scholar
  5. Eddington, A. (1924).The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 225.Google Scholar
  6. Einstein, A. (1949). InAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed., Harper & Brothers, New York, Vol. I, p. 89.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenhart, L. P. (1925).Riemannian Geometry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, p. 97.Google Scholar
  8. Finkelstein, D. (1981). Private communication.Google Scholar
  9. Glashow, S. L., and Gell-Mann, M. (1961).Annals of Physics,15, 437–460.Google Scholar
  10. Green, E. L. (1991). Private communication.Google Scholar
  11. Hatfield, B. (1992).Quantum Field Theory of Point Particles and Strings, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, California, p. 692.Google Scholar
  12. Mandelstam, S. (1962).Annals of Physics,19, 1–24.Google Scholar
  13. Pandres, D., Jr. (1962).Journal of Mathematical Physics,3, 602–607.Google Scholar
  14. Pandres, D., Jr. (1973).Lettere el Nuovo Cimento,8, 595–599.Google Scholar
  15. Pandres, D., Jr. (1977).Foundations of Physics,7, 421–430.Google Scholar
  16. Pandres, D., Jr. (1981).Physical Review D,24, 1499–1508.Google Scholar
  17. Pandres, D., Jr. (1984a).Physical Review D,30, 317–324.Google Scholar
  18. Pandres, D., Jr. (1984b).International Journal of Theoretical Physics,23, 839–842.Google Scholar
  19. Schrödinger, E. (1950).Space-Time Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 97.Google Scholar
  20. Synge, J. L. (1960).Relativity: The General Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 14.Google Scholar
  21. Witten, E. (1988). InSuperstrings: A Theory of Everything?, P. C. W. Davies and J. Brown, eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 90.Google Scholar
  22. Yang, C. N., and Mills, R. L. (1954).Physical Review,96, 191–195.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dave PandresJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceNorth Georgia CollegeDahlonega

Personalised recommendations