Skip to main content
Log in

A quantitative comparison of vector magnetic field measurement and analysis techniques

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We make a quantitative comparison between spectral vs filter measurement and analysis techniques for extraction of solar vector magnetic fields from polarimetric data using as a basis the accurately calibrated, high angular resolution Stokes profile data from the Advanced Stokes Polarimeter. It is shown that filter-based measurements deliver qualitative images of the field alignment for sunspots that are visually similar to images derived from the more detailed analysis of the Stokes profiles. However, quantitative comparison with least-squares fits to the full Stokes profiles show that both the strength of the field predicted by the filter-based analysis and its orientation contain substantial errors. These errors are largest for plage regions outside of sunspots, where the field strengths are inferred to be only a fraction of their true values, and errors in the orientation of 40–50° are common. Within sunspots, errors of 20° are commonplace. The greatest source of these errors is the inability of the filter-based measurements to account for the small fill fraction of magnetic fields or, equivalently, scattered light in the instrument, which reduce the degree of polarization. The uncertainties of the full profile fitting methods are also discussed, along with the errors introduced by coarser wavelength sampling of the observed Stokes profiles. The least-squares fitting procedure operates best when the profiles are sampled at least as frequently as one Doppler width of the line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruls, J. H. M. J., Lites, B. W., and Murphy, G. A.: 1991, in L. J. November (ed.),Solar Polarimetry, National Solar Observatory, Sunspot, NM, p. 444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, D. F., Lites, B. W., Tomczyk, S., Skumanich, A. P., Dunn, R. B., Schuenke, J. A., Streander, K. V., Leach, T. W., Chambellan, C. W., Hull, H. K., and Lacey, L. B.: 1992,Proceedings, SPIE 1746, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. P., Bogart, R., Canfield, R., Chapman, G., Henney, C., Kopp, G., Lites, B., Mickey, D., Montgomery, R., Pillet, V., Rabin, D., Ulrich, R., and Walton, S.: 1993,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 25, 1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C. U., Deubner, F.-L., Egger, U., Fleck, B., and Povel, H. P.: 1994,Astron. Astrophys., submitted.

  • Landi Degl'Innocenti, E.: 1979,Solar Phys. 63, 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolfi, M. and Landi Degl'Innocenti, E.: 1982,Solar Phys. 78, 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lites. B. W.: 1987,Appl.Optics 26, 3838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lites B. W. and Skumanich, A.: 1990,Astrophys. J. 348, 747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lites, B. W., Elmore, D. F., Seagraves, P., and Skumanich, A.: 1993,Astrophys. J. 418, 928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lites, B. W., Low, B. C., Martínez Pillet, V., Seagraves, P., Skumanich, A., Frank, Z. A., Shine, R. A., and Tsuneta, S.: 1994,Astrophys. J., submitted.

  • Martínez Pillet, V., Lites, B. W., Skumanich, A., and Seagraves, P.: 1994a, in K. S. Balasubramaniam and G. Simon (eds.),Solar Active Region Evolution - Comparing Models with Observations, National Solar Observatory, Sunspot, NM (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Pillet, V., Lites, B. W., Skumanich, A., and Degenhardt, D.: 1994b,Astrophys. J. 425, L113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, D.: 1992,Astrophys. J. 390, L103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Cobo. B. and del Toro Iniesta, J. C.: 1992,Astrophys. J. 398, 375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Almeida, J.: 1992,Solar Phys. 137, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Almeida, J. and Martínez Pillet, V.: 1994,Astrophys. J. 424, 1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, G. B., Brown, D. S., Petterson, L., and Rehn, J.: 1985,Appl. Optics 24, 2558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel, M.: 1980,Astron. Astrophys. 91, 369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skumanich, A. and Lites, B. W.: 1987,Astrophys. J. 322, 473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skumanich, A., Grossmann-Doerth, U., and Lites, B. W.: 1992, in M. Faurobert-Scholl, H. Frisch, and N. Mein (eds.),Methods for the Determination of Solar and Stellar Magnetic Fields, Observatoire de Meudon, Meudon, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skumanich, A., Lites, B. W., and Martínez Pillet, V.: 1994, in R. J. Rutten and C. J. Schrijver (eds.),Solar Surface Magnetism, NATO ASI Series C433, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skumanich, A., Martínez Pillet, V., Lites, B. W., and Seagraves, P.: 1995, in preparation.

  • Solanki, S. K.: 1986,Astron. Astrophys. 168, 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo, J. O.: 1985, in M. J. Hagyard (ed.),Measurements of Solar Vector Magnetic Fields, NASA Conf. Publ. 2374, p. 322.

  • Title, A. M., Frank, Z. A., Shine, R. A., Tarbell, T. D., Topka, K. P., Scharmer, G. B., and Schmidt, W.: 1992,Astrophys. J. 403, 780.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On leave from the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.

The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lites, B.W., Martínez Pillet, V. & Skumanich, A. A quantitative comparison of vector magnetic field measurement and analysis techniques. Sol Phys 155, 1–27 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00670727

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00670727

Keywords

Navigation