Advertisement

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 289–306 | Cite as

Reconstruction of abstract quantum theory

  • M. Drieschner
  • Th. Görnitz
  • C. F. von Weizsäcker
Article

Abstract

Understanding quantum theory as a general theory of prediction, we reconstruct “abstract” quantum theory. “Abstract” means the general frame of quantum theory, without reference to a three-dimensional position space, to concepts like particle or field, or to special laws of dynamics. “Reconstruction” is the attempt to do this by formulating simple and plausible postulates on prediction in order to derive the basic concepts of quantum theory from them. Thereby no law of “classical” physics is presupposed which would then have to be “quantized.” We briefly discuss the relationship of “theory” and “interpretation” in physics and the fundamental role of time as a basic concept for physics. Then a number ofassertions are given, formulated as succinctly as possible in order to make them easily quotable and comparable. The assertions are arranged in four groups: heuristic principles, verbal definitions of some terms, three basic postulates, and consequences. The three postulates of separable alternatives, indeterminism, and kinematics are the central points of this work. These brief assertions are commented upon, and their relationship with the interpretation of quantum theory is discussed. Also given are an outlook on the further development into “concrete quantum theory” and some philosophical reflections.

Keywords

Reflection Field Theory Quantum Field Theory General Theory Quantum Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Castell, L. (1975). Quantum theory of simple alternatives, inQuantum Theory and the Structures of Time and Space I, L. Castell, M. Drieschner, and C. F. v. Weizsäcker, eds., Hanser, Munich.Google Scholar
  2. Cramer, J. G. (1986).Reviews of Modem Physics,58, 647.Google Scholar
  3. Drieschner, M. (1970). Quantum mechanics as a general theory of objective prediction, Thesis, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  4. Drieschner, M. (1979).Voraussage, Wahrscheinlichkeit, Objekt, Springer Lecture Notes in Physics, No. 99, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Ehrenfest, P. (1932).Zeitschrift für Physik,78, 555.Google Scholar
  6. Görnitz, Th. (1986).International journal of Theoretical Physics,25, 897.Google Scholar
  7. Görnitz, Th. (1987). On connections between abstract quantum theory and space-time structure,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,27(5).Google Scholar
  8. Görnitz, Th., and Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1987a). Remarks on S. Kochen's interpretations of quantum mechanics, inProceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, Joensuu, 1987, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds., World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar
  9. Görnitz, Th., and Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1987b). Quantum interpretations,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,26, 921.Google Scholar
  10. Görnitz, Th., and Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1988). Copenhagen and Transactional interpretations,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,27, 237.Google Scholar
  11. Heisenberg, W. (1969). Die Quantenmechanik und ein Gespräch mit Einstein, inDer Teil und das Ganze, Chapter 5, Piper, Munich.Google Scholar
  12. Jauch, J. M. (1968).Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Meyer-Abich, A. (1948).Naturphilosophie auf neuen Wegen, Hippokrates, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  14. Pauli, W. (1932). Einige die Quantenmechanik betreffende Erkundigungsfragen,Zeitschrift für Physik,80, 573.Google Scholar
  15. Scheibe, E., Süssmann, G., and Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1958).Zeitschrift für Naturforschung,13, 705.Google Scholar
  16. Smuts, J. Ch. (1927).Holism and Evolution, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  17. Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1939).Annalen der Physik,36, 275.Google Scholar
  18. Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1955),Naturwissenschaften,42, 521–529, 545–555.Google Scholar
  19. Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1971).Die Einheit der Natur, Hanser, Munich (The Unity of Nature, Farrar, Straus, Giroux, New York (1980a)).Google Scholar
  20. Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1985a).Aufbau der Physik, Hanser, Munich.Google Scholar
  21. Weizsaecker, C. F. v. (1985b). Quantum theory and space-time, inSymposium on the Foundations of Modem Physics, Joensuu, 1987, P. Lathi and P. Mittelstaedt, eds., World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar
  22. Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1986).Reconstruction of Quantum Theory, inQuantum Theory and the Structures of Time and Space VI, L. Castell and C. F. v. Weizsäcker, eds., Hanser, Munich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Drieschner
    • 1
  • Th. Görnitz
    • 2
  • C. F. von Weizsäcker
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieRuhr-Universität BochumBochum-1
  2. 2.Arbeitsgruppe Afheldt in der Max-Planck-GesellschaftStarnbergFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations