Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 128, Issue 1, pp 13–20 | Cite as

Evoked potentials and spike responses to moving stimuli in the optic tectum of goldfish

  • Frans C. C. Riemslag
  • Nico A. M. Schellart


  1. 1.

    Tectal evoked responses (TERs) to periodically moving stimuli recorded from common goldfish (Carassius auratus) are a mixture of luminance and directionally selective components, reflecting the activity of the various kinds of tectal cells.

  2. 2.

    To separate the directionally selective components from the luminance components the TERs to moving stimuli were recorded at a flat part of the TER sensitivity profile and Fourier analysed. The profiles were plotted automatically with flickering light by application of the equal response method.

  3. 3.

    Fourier analysis showed that only a small part (ca. 18%) of the power of the response to horizontal movements can be attributed to directional selectivity.

  4. 4.

    Electrical stimulation of the optic nerve helps to identify ganglion cell terminals from post-synaptic tectal neurons. The units identified in this manner as tectal neurons can be directionally selective.

  5. 5.

    It was found that a very small part of the retinal ganglion cells but a considerable part of the tectal cells are directionally selective.

  6. 6.

    The small excess of the tectal cells with a temporo-nasal preferred direction makes the generally weak directional selectivity of the TER plausible.



Optic Nerve Ganglion Cell Retinal Ganglion Cell Prefer Direction Horizontal Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Directionally selective unit


Tectal evoked response


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clarke, P.G.H.: Are visual evoked potentials to motion-reversal produced by direction-sensitive brain mechanisms? Vision Res.14, 1281–1284 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. Cronly-Dillon, J.R.: Units sensitive to direction of movement in goldfish optic tectum. Nature (Lond.)203, 214–215 (1964)Google Scholar
  3. Daw, N.W., Beauchamp, R.D.: Unusual units in the goldfish optic nerve. Vision Res.12, 1849–1856 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. Grafstein, B.: Transport of protein by goldfish optic nerve fibers. Science (Wash.)157, 196–198 (1967)Google Scholar
  5. Jacobson, M., Gaze, R.M.: Types of visual response from single units in the optic tectum and optic nerve of the goldfish. Q.J. Exp. Physiol.49, 199–209 (1964)Google Scholar
  6. Murakami, M., Shimoda, Y.: Identification of amacrine and ganglion cells in the carp retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.)264, 801–818 (1977)Google Scholar
  7. O'Benar, J.D.: Electrophysiology of neural units in goldfish optic tectum. Brain Res. Bull.1, 529–541 (1976)Google Scholar
  8. Padmos, P., Van Norren, D.V.: The vector voltmeter as a tool to measure electroretinogram spectral sensitivity and dark adaption. Invest. Ophthal.11, 783–788 (1972)Google Scholar
  9. Regan, D., Schellart, N.A.M., Spekreijse, H., Van Den Berg, T.J.T.P.: Photometry in goldfish by electrophysiological recording: comparison of criterion response method with heterochromatic flicker photometry. Vision Res.15, 799–807 (1975)Google Scholar
  10. Schellart, N.A.M., Spekreijse, H.: Shapes of receptive field centers in optic tectum of goldfish. Vision Res.16, 1018–1020 (1976)Google Scholar
  11. Sutterlin, A.M., Prosser, C.L.: Electrical properties of goldfish optic tectum. J. Neurophysiol.33, 36–45 (1970)Google Scholar
  12. Tyler, C.W., Kaitz, M.: Movement adaptation in the visual evoked response. Exp. Brain Res.27, 203–209 (1977)Google Scholar
  13. Vanegas, H., Amat, J., Essayag-Millán, E.: Electrophysiological evidence of tectal efferents to the fish eye. Brain Res.54, 309–313 (1973)Google Scholar
  14. Vanegas, H., Essayag-Millán, E., Laufer, M.: Response of the optic tectum to stimulation of the optic nerve in the teleostEugerres plumieri. Brain Res.31, 107–118 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Wartzok, D., Marks, W.B.: Directionally selective visual units recorded in optic tectum of the goldfish. J. Neurophysiol.36, 588–604 (1973)Google Scholar
  16. Wurtz, R.: Comparison of effects of eye movements and stimulus movements on striate cortex neurons of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol.32, 987–994 (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frans C. C. Riemslag
    • 1
  • Nico A. M. Schellart
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Medical PhysicsUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations