Literatur
Anderson, A. F.: Probable percentage of regression of carcinoma in situ. Acta cytol. (Philad.)6, 196 (1962).
Ayre, J. E.: Regression of anaplastic lesions (carcinoma in situ) of the cervix using aureomycin; a preliminary report of 6 responsive cases. Antibiot. and Chemother.1, 339 (1951).
—: Regression of cervical carcinoma in situ following aureomycin. Sth. med. J. (Bghm., Ala.)45, 915 (1952).
—: Cytologie behavior patterns in pre-malignant lesions of cervix. Proceed. of the I. Internat. Congr. of Exfol. Cytol. Vienna, 1961. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company 1962.
Bajardi, F.: In case of a suspicious ektocervix, should a biopsy be done without Cytology? Acta cytol. (Philad.)4, 264 (1960).
—: Nomenclature of the atypical epithelium. Acta cytol. (Philad.)5, 344 (1961).
Burghardt, E.: Über die prospektive Bedeutung pathologischer Epithelformen der Cervix uteri. Proceed. of the I. Internat. Congr. of Exfol. Cytol., Vienna, 1961. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company 1962.
Fennel, R. H., andR. M. Graham: A serial-section study of the cervix in cases with positive vaginal smears and negative biopsies. Cancer (Philad.)8, 310 (1955).
Galvin, G. G., H. W. Jones andR. W. Te Linde: The significance of basal-cell hyperactivity in cervical biopsies. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.70, 808 (1955).
Glatthaar, E., u.J. H. Müller: Die Terminologie des pathologischen Portioepithels in der internationalen Literatur. In: Seitz-Amreich, Biologie und Pathologie des Weibes, Bd. III/3, S. 934. Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg 1955.
Hamperl, H., C. Kaufmann u.K. G. Ober: Histologische Untersuchungen an der Cervix schwangerer Frauen. Arch. Gynäk.184, 181 (1954).
Held, E.: Das Oberflächencarcinom. Arch. Gynäk.183, 322 (1953).
—: Rückbildung von atypischem und abnormem Plattenepithel der Portio im histologischen Präparat. Gynaecologia (Basel)144, 27 (1957).
Hertig, A. T.: What is carcinoma in situ? Proceed. of the 3. Nat. Cancer Conf., Detroit, 1956, p. 667–670. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company 1957.
Hillemanns, H. G.: Zur formalen Genese des Carcinoma colli uteri. Arch. Gynäk.191, 235 (1958).
—, u.D. Wagner: über Versuche der lokalen cytostatischen Behandlung des sog Oberflächencarcinoms am Collum uteri zur Prüfung der chemotherapeutischen Wirkung auf die atypische Plattenepithelzelle. Arch. Gynäk.192, 277 (1960).
——: Lokale cytostatische Behandlung des Oberflächencarcinoms (Carcinoma in situ) am Collum uteri. Strahlentherapie117, 27 (1962).
Jenny, J., u.H. J. Wyss: Zur Frage der Rückbildungsvorgänge pathologischer Portioveränderungen in graviditate. Proceed. of the I. Internat. Congr. of Exfol. Cytol., Vienna, 1961. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company 1962.
——,A. Wacek, J. H. Müller u.E. Held: Die Schwangerschaft als Engpaß in der Krebsfährtensuche. Geburtsh. Frauenheilk.20, 1136 (1960).
Kawecka, M., J. Bylina, I. Kliniak andH. Starkiewich: In case of a suspicious ectocervix, should a biopsy be done without cytology? Acta cytol. (Philad.)4, 264 (1960).
Kern, G.: Zelltypen im cytologischen Vaginalausstrich und ihre Zuordnung zu histologischen Bildern. Z. Krebsforsch.63, 149 (1959).
—: Cytologische Vorhersage von Epithelatypien an der Cervix uteri. Arch. Gynäk.197, 314 (1962).
Koss, L. G.: Diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company 1961.
—: Probable percentage of regression of carcinoma in situ. Acta cytol. (Philad.)6, 195 (1962).
-, M. J.Jordan, F. W.Stewakt, G. M.Bader, E.Day and G. R.Durfee: Follow up study of carcinoma in situ and related epithelial abnormalities of uterine cervix. IV. Congr. Internac. de Patologia Clinica. Rev. Diagn. biol. (Madr.)1960, 291.
—,F. W. Stewart, M. J. Jordan, F. W. Foote, G. M. Bader, E. Day andG. R. Durfee: A long-term cyto-histologic study of untreated carcinoma in situ and related abnormalities of the uterine cervix. Proceed. of the I. Internat. Congr. of Exfol. Cytol., Vienna, 1961. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company 1962.
Kottmeier, H. L.: Symposion über Carcinoma in situ, 22. 5. 55, Hamburg. Strahlentherapie99, 340 (1955).
Kremer, H.: In case of a suspicious ectocervix, should a biopsy be done without cytology? Acta cytol. (Philad.)4, 265 (1960).
Lapid, L. S., andM. A. Goldberger: Exfoliative dyskaryotic cells associated with atypical cervical lesions. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.61, 1324 (1951).
Limburg, H.: Oberflächencarcinom und Schwangerschaft. Geburtsh. u. Frauenheilk.14, 92 (1954).
—: Die Frühdiagnose des Uterus-Carcinoms, 3. Aufl., S. 134 u. 305. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1956.
—: Probable percentage of regression of carcinoma in situ. Acta cytol. (Philad.)6, 196 (1962).
McKay, D. G., B. Terjanian, D. Poschyachinda, P. A. Younge andA. T. Hertig: Clinical and pathologic significance of anaplasia (atypical hyperplasia) of the cervix uteri. Obstet. and Gynec.13, 2 (1959).
Nieburgs, H. E.: The effect of excessive doses of diethylstilbestrol on carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet. and Gynec.2, 213 (1953).
Papanicolaou, G. N.: Present status and future trends of exfoliative cytology. Ca.-Bull. of Cancer Progr.2, 50 (1952).
—: Atlas of exfoliative cytology, S. 30–32. Cambridge, Mass.: The Commonwealth Fund; Harvard-University Press 1954.
—: Exfoliative cytologic patterns in carcinoma in situ correlated with histopathologic findings. Proceed, of the 3. Nat. Cancer Conf., Detroit 1956, p. 652–658. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company 1957.
Peckham, B., andR. R. Green: Follow-up on cervical epithelial abnormalities. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.74, 804 (1957).
Petersen, O.: Preoancerous changes of the cervical epithelium in relation to manifest cervical carcinoma. Copenhagen: Danish Science Press LTD 1955.
Randerath, E., u. G.Hieronymi: Zur Frage des sog. Oberflächencarcinoms der Portio uteri. Münch. med. Wschr.1956, 1269.
Rawson, A. J., andR. Knoblich: A clinicopathologic study of 56 cases showing atypical epithelial changes of the cervix uteri. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.73, 120 (1957).
Reagan, J. W., D. J. Hicks andR. B. Scott: Atypical hyperplasia of uterine cervix. Cancer (Philad.)8, 52 (1955). (Bgham, Ala.)45, 915 (1952).
Scipiades, E., u.K. S. Stevenson: Über die Latenzperiode des beginnenden Collum-Carcinoms und die Dauer seiner Symptomfreiheit. Arch. Gynäk.167, 416 (1938).
Siegler, E. E.: Cytomorphology of carcinoma in situ. Acty cytol. (Philad.)5, 428 (1961).
Stoll, P.: In case of a suspicious ectocervix, should a biopsy be done without cytology? Acta cytol. (Philad.)4, 266 (1960).
Takeuchi, A., andD. G. McKay: The area of the cervix involved by carcinoma in situ and anaplasia (atypical hyperplasia). Obstet. and Gynec.15, 134 (1960).
Wagner, D.: Persistenz und Spontanregression des atypischen Plattenepithels nach konservativer Therapie des Oberflächencarcinoms am Collum uteri. Proceed. of the I. Internat. Congr. of Exfol. Cytol., Vienna, 1961. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott 1962.
Wagner, D.: Die Erfassung des rezidivierenden Oberflächencarcinoms am Collum uteri nach konservativer Therapie. Geburtsh. u. Frauenheilk.21, 945 (1961).
Wespi, H. J.: Entstehung und Früherfassung des Portio-Carcinoms. Basel: Benno Schwabe & Co. 1946.
Younge, P. A.: The conservative treatment of carcinoma in situ of the cervix. Proceed. of the 3. Nat. Cancer Conf., Detroit, 1956, p. 682. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company 1957.
—,A. T. Hertig andD. Armstrong: A study of 135 cases of carcinoma in situ of the cervix at the free hospital for women. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec.58, 867 (1949).
—, andA. Y. Kevorkian: Carcinoma in situ of the cervix. The problems of detection and evaluation in regard to therapy. Ciba Foundation Study Group No 3; London: J. u. A. Churchill LTD 1959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, D., Schlaich, P. Zur Frage der Rückbildung von atypischem Plattenepithel an der Cervix uteri. Arch. Gynak. 199, 379–413 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00668019
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00668019