Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in medullary carcinoma of the breast -a flow cytometric analysis using archival material

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment volume 29, pages 297–306 (1994)Cite this article

Summary

In a population of 110 primary breast cancers with medullary features, registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) from 1977-82, we have determined ploidy and S-phase fraction (SF) by flow cytometry (FCM) on paraffin embedded tumour tissue. The distribution of DNA ploidy is not different from the distribution described for breast cancers in general. No difference is found between the subgroups of medullary and non-medullary cancer when using a new simplified histopathological definition of medullary carcinoma of the breast, recently proposed by us. When using the definition proposed by Ridolfiet al. in 1977, we find significantly more tumours with aneuploidy and high SF in the groups of typical medullary carcinoma (TMC) and atypical medullary carcinoma (AMC) than in the small group of non-medullary carcinoma (NMC), which seems a paradox, as patients with NMC have the worst prognosis. However, the number of patients in the NMC group is very small, and the percentage of aneuploid tumours is very low. In 84 protocolled patients we found no statistically prognostic importance of ploidy or SF, either in the whole group assessed or when stratifying for the histopathological subgroups. However, a prognostic influence of SF can be traced for the non-medullary cancers, according to the new definition, but not for the medullary cancers of the breast. The result emphasizes the impression of MC as being biologically different from other histological types of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Pedersen L, Holck S, Schiødt T: Medullary carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Treat Rev 15: 53–63, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ridolfi RL, Rosen PP, Port A, Kinne D, Miké V: Medullary carcinoma of the breast. A clinicopathologic study with 10 year follow-up. Cancer 40: 1365–1385, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rapin V, Contesso G, Mouriesse H, Bertin F, Lacombe MJ, Piekarski JD, Travagli JP, Gadenne C, Friedman S: Medullary breast carcinoma. A reevaluation of 95 cases of breast cancer with inflammatory stroma. Cancer 61: 2503–2510, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wargotz ES, Silverberg SG: Medullary carcinoma of the breast: A clinicopathologic study with appraisal of current diagnostic criteria. Hum Pathol 19: 1340–1346, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Visscher DW, Zarbo RJ, Greenawald KA, Crissman JD: Prognostic significance of morphological parameters and flow cytometric DNA analysis in carcinoma of the breast. Pathol Annu 25 Pt 1: 171–210, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tubiana M, Koscielny S: Cell kinetics, growth rate and the natural history of breast cancer. The Heuson Memorial Lecture. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 24: 9–14, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW, Rugg CA, Musgrove EA: Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 31: 1333–1335, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schutte B, Reynders MMJ, Bosman FT, Blijham GH: Flow cytometric determination of DNA ploidy level in nuclei isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue. Cytometry 6: 26–30, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pedersen L, Zedeler K, Holck S, Schiødt T, Mouridsen HT: Medullary carcinoma of the breast, proposal for a new simplified histopathological definition. Based on prognostic observations and observations on inter- and intraobserver variability of 11 histopathological characteristics in 131 breast carcinomas with medullary features. Br J Cancer 63: 591–595, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pedersen L, Holck S, Schiødt T, Zedeler K, Mouridsen HT: Inter- and intraobserver variability in the histopathological diagnosis of medullary carcinoma of the breast, and its prognostic implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 14: 91–99, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pedersen L, Schiødt T, Holck S, Zedeler K: The prognostic importance of syncytial growth pattern in medullary carcinoma of the breast. APMIS 98: 921–926, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen KW, Mouridsen HT, Castberg Th, Fischerman K, Andersen J, Hou-Jensen K, Brincker H, Johansen H, Henriksen E, Rørth M, Rossing N: Organization of the Danish Adjuvant Trials in Breast Cancer. Dan Med Bull 28: 102–106, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lykkesfeldt AE, Balslev I, Christensen IJ, Larsen JK, Mølgaard H, Rasmussen BB, Thorpe S, Rose C: DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in primary breast tumours in relation to prognostic factors and survival for premenopausal patients at high risk for recurrent disease. Acta Oncol 27: 749–756, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vindeløv LL, Christensen IJ: A review of techniques and results obtained in one laboratory by an integrated system of methods designed for routine clinical flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry 11: 753–770, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen JK, Munch-Petersen B, Christiansen J, Jørgensen K: Flow cytometric discrimination of mitotic cells: Resolution of M, as well as G1, S, and G2 phase nuclei with mithramycin, propidium iodide, and ethidium bromide after fixation with formaldehyde. Cytometry 7: 54–63, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christensen I, Hartmann NR, Keiding N, Larsen JK, Noer H, Vindeløv L: Statistical analysis of DNA distributions from cell populations with partial synchrony. In: Lutz D (ed) Pulse-Cytophotometry III. European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 519–526

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kallioniemi O-P: Comparison of fresh and paraffin-embedded tissue as starting material for DNA flow cytometry and evaluation of intratumor heterogeneity. Cytometry 9: 164–169, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hedley DW: Flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissue: Five years on. Cytometry 10: 229–241, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alanen KA, Klemi PJ, Joenssuu H, Kujari H, Pekkala E: Comparison of fresh, ethanol-preserved, and paraffin-embedded samples in DNA flow cytometry. Cytometry 10: 81–85, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alanen KA, Joenssuu H, Klemi PJ: Autolysis is a potential source of false aneuploid peaks in flow cytometric DNA histograms. Cytometry 10: 417–425, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher ER, Gregorio RM, Fisher B, Redmond C, Vellios F, Sommers SC, and cooperating investigators: The pathology of invasive breast cancer. A syllabus derived from findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol no. 4). Cancer 36: 1–84, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  22. Atkin NB: Modal deoxyribonucleic acid value and survival in carcinoma of the breast. Br Med J 1: 271–272, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  23. Atkin NB, Kay R: Prognostic significance of modal DNA value and other factors in malignant tumours, based on 1465 cases. Br J Cancer 40: 210–221, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  24. Auer GU, Caspersson TO, Wallgren AS: DNA content and survival in mammary carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol 2: 161–165, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  25. Coulson PB, Thornthwaite JT, Woolley TW, Sugarbaker EV, Seckinger D: Prognostic indicators including DNA histogram type, receptor content, and staging related to human breast cancer patient survival. Cancer Res 44: 4187–4196, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cornelisse CJ, van de Velde CJH, Caspers RJC, Moolenaar AJ, Hermans J: DNA ploidy and survival in breast cancer patients. Cytometry 8: 225–234, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dowle CS, Owainati A, Robins A, Burns K, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Blamey RW: Prognostic significance of the DNA content of human breast cancer. Br J Surg 74: 133–136, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hedley DW, Rugg CA, Ng ABP, Taylor IW: Influence of cellular DNA content on disease-free survival of stage II breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 44: 5395–5398, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW: Application of DNA flow cytometry to paraffin-embedded archival material for the study of aneuploidy and its clinical significance. Cytometry 6: 327–333, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hedley DW, Rugg CA, Gelber RD: Association of DNA Index and S-phase fraction with prognosis of node positive early breast cancer. Cancer Res 47: 4729–4735, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kallioniemi O-P, Blanco G, Alavaikko M, Hietanen T, Mattila J, Lauslahti K, Koivula T: Tumour DNA ploidy as an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 56: 637–642, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beerman H, Kluin PM, Hermans J, van de Velde CJ, Cornelisse CJ: Prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy in a series of 690 primary breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 45: 34–39, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  33. Uyterlinde AM, Baak JP, Schipper NW, Peterse H, Matze E, Meijer CJ: Further evaluation of the prognostic value of morphometric and flow cytometric parameters in breast-cancer patients with long follow-up. Int J Cancer 45: 1–7, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  34. Toikkanen S, Joenssuu H, Klemi P: The prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in invasive breast cancer - a study with long-term follow-up. Br J Cancer 60: 693–700, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  35. von Rosen A, Rutqvist LE, Carstensen J, Fallenius A, Skoog L, Auer G: Prognostic value of nuclear DNA content in breast cancer in relation to tumor size, nodal status, and estrogen receptor content. Breast Cancer Res Treat 13: 23–32, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  36. Keyhani-Rofagha S, O'Toole RV, Farrar WB, Sickle-Santanello B, DeCenzo J, Young D: Is DNA ploidy an independent prognostic indicator in infiltrative node-negative breast adenocarcinoma? Cancer 65: 1577–1582, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  37. McDivitt RW, Stone KR, Craig RB, Meyer JS: A comparison of human breast cancer cell kinetics measured by flow cytometry and thymidine labeling. Lab Invest 52: 287–291, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  38. McGuire WL: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 10: 5–9, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dressler LG, Seamer LC, Owens MA, Clark GM, McGuire WL: DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimens. Cancer 61: 420–427, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  40. Eskelinen M, Nordling S, Puittinen J, Pesonen E, Collan Y: The flow-cytometric analysis of DNA content and S-phase fraction (SPF) of human breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract 185: 694–697, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eskelinen MJ, Pajarinen P, Collan Y, Pesonen E, Alhava E, Kettunen K, Nordling S: Relationship between DNA ploidy and survival in patients with primary breast cancer. Br J Surg 76: 830–834, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kallioniemi O-P, Hietanen T, Mattila J, Lehtinen M, Lauslahti K, Koivula T: Aneuploid DNA content and high S-phase fraction of tumour cells are related to poor prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23: 277–283, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ewers S-B, Langström E, Baldetorp B, Killander D: Flowcytometric DNA analysis in primary breast carcinomas and clinicopathological correlations. Cytometry 5: 408–419, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  44. Friedlander ML, Hedley DW, Taylor IW: Clinical and biological significance of aneuploidy in human tumours. J Clin Pathol 37: 961–974, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cornelisse CJ, de Koning HR, Moolenaar AJ, van de Velde CJ, Ploem JS: Image and flow cytometric analysis of DNA content in breast cancer. Relation to estrogen receptor content and lymph node involvement. Anal Quant Cytol 6: 9–18, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jakobsen A, Poulsen HS, Madsen EL, Petersen SE, Hansen HS: Ploidy level of human breast carcinoma. Acta Radiol [Oncol] 23: 103–107, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  47. Owainati AAR, Robins RA, Hinton C, Ellis IO, Dowle CS, Ferry B, Elston CW, Blamey RW, Baldwin RW: Tumour aneuploidy prognostic parameters and survival in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 55: 449–454, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  48. Erhardt K, Auer G, Folin A, Silfverswärd C, Skoog L: Comparison between histologic type, estrogen receptor, and nuclear DNA content in mammary carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 9: 83–89, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  49. Olszewski W, Darzynkiewicz Z, Rosen PP, Schwartz MK, Melamed MR: Flow cytometry of breast carcinoma: II. Relation of tumor cell cycle distribution to histology and estrogen receptor. Cancer 48: 985–988, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  50. Olszewski W, Darzynkiewicz Z, Rosen PP, Schwartz MK, Melamed MR: Flow cytometry of breast carcinoma: I. Relation of DNA ploidy level to histology and estrogen receptor. Cancer 48: 980–984, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  51. Moran RE, Black MM, Alpert L, Strauss MJ: Correlation of cell-cycle kinetics, hormone receptors, histopathology, and nodal status in human breast cancer. Cancer 54: 1586–1590, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  52. Horsfall DJ, Tilley WD, Orell SR, Marshall VR, Cant ELM: Relationship between ploidy and steroid hormone receptors in primary invasive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 53: 23–28, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  53. McDivitt RW, Stone KR, Craig RB, Palmer JO, Meyer JS, Bauer WC: A proposed classification of breast cancer based on kinetic information. Derived from a comparison of risk factors in 168 primary operable breast cancers. Cancer 57: 269–276, 1986

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology ONK, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Lise Pedersen

  2. The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Jørgen K. Larsen & Ib Jarle Christensen

  3. Department of Tumor Endocrinology, Danish Cancer Society, Division for Cancer Biology, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Anne Lykkesfeldt

  4. Department of Pathology, Frederiksborg Amts Centralsygehus, Hillerød, Denmark

    Susanne Holck

  5. Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Torben Schiødt

Authors
  1. Lise Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jørgen K. Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ib Jarle Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anne Lykkesfeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Susanne Holck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Torben Schiødt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, L., Larsen, J.K., Christensen, I.J. et al. DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in medullary carcinoma of the breast -a flow cytometric analysis using archival material. Breast Cancer Res Tr 29, 297–306 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666484

Key words

search

Navigation