Some difficulties for Clifton, Redhead, and Butterfield's recent proof of nonlocality
- 19 Downloads
Clifton, Redhead, and Butterfield have recently produced a generalization of the new non-locality proof due to Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger. Their proof is intended to have certain advantages over the standard Belltype arguments. One of these is that, although the proof allows for causally relevant apparatus hidden variables, it avoids the need for making certain standard locality assumptions about those parameters. On closer inspection, the part of the proof which supposedly removes the need for such assumptions is shown to rest on a fallacy. This renders the proof invalid. Two other, related difficulties are explored along the way.
Key wordsLocality nonlocality EPR Bell inequalities Greenbergeret al. Cliftonet al.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R.K. Clifton, M.L.G. Redhead, and J.N. Butterfield, “Generalization of the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger algebraic proof of nonlocality,”Found. Phys. 21, 149–84 (1991).Google Scholar
- 2.D.M. Greenberger, M.A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, “Going beyond Bell's theorem,” in M. Kafatos, ed.,Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht 1989), pp. 69–72.Google Scholar
- 3.R.K. Clifton, M.L.G. Redhead, and J.N. Butterfield,op. cit., pp. 157–8.Google Scholar
- 4.Op. cit., pp. 164–5.Google Scholar
- 5.Op. cit., p. 156.Google Scholar
- 6.Ibid. Google Scholar
- 7.Ibid. Google Scholar
- 8.Op. cit., p. 165.Google Scholar
- 9.Op. cit., p. 156.Google Scholar
- 10.Op. cit., p. 158.Google Scholar
- 11.Op. cit., p. 157.Google Scholar
- 12.Op. cit., pp. 156 and 163–4.Google Scholar
- 13.Op. cit., pp. 164–5.Google Scholar
- 14.Op. cit., p. 164.Google Scholar