Advertisement

Foundations of Physics Letters

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 303–335 | Cite as

A sum-over-histories account of an EPR(B) experiment

  • Sukanya Sinha
  • Rafael D. Sorkin
Article

Abstract

We analyze a variant of the EPRB experiment within a framework for quantum mechanics that rests on a radical interpretation of the sum over histories. Within this framework, reality is (just as classically) a single “history”, e.g. a definite collection of particles undergoing definite motions; and quantum dynamics appears as a kind of stochastic law of motion for that history, a law formulated in terms of non-classical probability-amplitudes. No state vectors enter this framework, and their attendant nonlocality is therefore absent as well.

Key words

EPR photons sum-over-histories 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Geroch, “The Everett interpretation”,Noûs 18, 617 (1984).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    B. DeWitt and N. Graham,The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. Hellman, “Quantum logic and meaning”, inPSA 1980, Vol. 2, pp.493–511 (Philosophy of Science Association , 1981).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R.P. Feynman, “Space-Time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 267 (1948); R.P Feynman and A.R. HibbsQuantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw Hill, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R.D Sorkin, “Problems with causality in the sum-over-histories framework for quantum mechanics”, inProceedings, the Osgood Hill Conference on the Conceptual problems of Quantum Gravity, May 1988, eds. A. Ashtekar and J.Stachel ( Birkhäuser,Boston, to appear).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R.D. Sorkin, “On the role of time in the sum-over-histories framework for gravity,” inProceedings,the Conference on History of Modern Gauge Theories, Logan Utah, July 1987, ed. by M.Dresden and A. Rosenblum (World Scientific, Singapore, in press).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.B Hartle, “Quantum kinematics of space-time, III: General relativity” UCSB preprintGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. Caves, “Quantum mechanics of measurements distributed in time. A path-integral formulation,”Phys. Rev. D 33, 1643 (1986).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J.S Bell, “On the Einstein- Podolsky- Rosen Paradox,”Physics 1, 195 (1964)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Kochen and E.P Specker, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics”J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R.P Feynman and J.R Vernon, “The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system”,Ann. Phys. (N.Y) 24, 118 (1963); A.O. Caldeira and A.J Leggett, “Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion”,Physica 121A, 587 (1983).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Weyl, “Wissenschaft als Symbolische Konstruction des Menschen,” Eranos-Jahrbuch 1948, vol. 16:Der Mensch, p.428 (Rhein-Verlag,Zürich 1949).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Rafael Sorkin (unpublished), 1985Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Allen Stairs, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    D.M Greenberger, M. Horne, A. Shimony and A. Zeilinger,Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131(1990);N.D. Mermin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373(1990).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M.Horne, A. Shimony and A. Zeilinger, “Introduction to two-particle interferometry” inSixty-two Years of Uncertainty ed. by A. Miller (Plenum, New York 1990); J.G Rarity and P.R Tapster, “ Experimental violation of Bell's inequality based on phase and momentum”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2495 (1990)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Sorkin, R.D., “Quantum states (still) cannot be local”, University of Maryland preprint (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sukanya Sinha
    • 1
  • Rafael D. Sorkin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Physics DepartmentSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations