Advertisement

Roux's archives of developmental biology

, Volume 200, Issue 6, pp 297–299 | Cite as

Wilhelm Roux and the rest: Developmental theories 1885–1895

  • Klaus Sander
Essay

Keywords

Developmental Biology Developmental Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Driesch H (1892a; issued 10.11.1891) Entwicklungsmechanische Studien: I. Der Werth der beiden ersten Furchungszellen in der Echinodermenentwicklung. Experimentelle Erzeugung von Theil- und Doppelbildungen. Z Wiss Zool 53:160–178Google Scholar
  2. Driesch H (1892b) Entwicklungsmechanische Studien VI: Über einige allgemeine Fragen der theoretischen Morphologic. Z Wiss Zool 55:34–58Google Scholar
  3. Driesch H (1894) Analytische Theorie der organischen Entwicklung, Engelmann, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  4. Driesch H (1909) Philosophic des Organischen (Gifford Lectures). Engelmann, Leipzig (English edition 1908)Google Scholar
  5. Hertwig O (1892) Urmund and Spina bifida. Arch Mikrosk Anat 39:353–503Google Scholar
  6. Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought. Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge / MassGoogle Scholar
  7. Oppenheimer JM (1965) Questions posed by classical descriptive and experimental embryology. In: Moore JA (ed) Ideas in modern biology. Natural History Press, Garden City / NY, pp 205–227Google Scholar
  8. Roux W (1885a) Beitrage zur Entwickelungsmechanik des Embryo: I. Einleitung. Z Biol 21:411–524 (reprinted in Gesammelte Abhandlungen vol 2)Google Scholar
  9. Roux W (1885b) Beitrage zur Entwickelungsmechanik des Embryo: 111. Ueber die Bestimmung der Hauptricbtungen des Froschembryo im Ei and über die erste Theilung des Froscheies. Breslauer Ärztl Z 1885 Nr. 6ff:1–55 (reprinted as above)Google Scholar
  10. Roux W (1893) (Discussion on the talks of O. Schultze and H.E. Ziegler). Verh Anat Ges 1894:148 (reprinted as above)Google Scholar
  11. Roux W (1895) Einleitung. Arch Entwikkelungsmech Org 1:1–42Google Scholar
  12. Roux W (1897) Für unser Programm and seine Verwirklichung. Arch Entwickelungsmech Org 5:1–80, 219–342Google Scholar
  13. Sander K (1991a) Wilhelm Roux and his programme for developmental biology. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 200:1–3Google Scholar
  14. Sander K (1991b) Wilhelm Roux's treatise on “qualitative” mitoses — a classic by either definition. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 200:61–63Google Scholar
  15. Weismann A (1885) Die Continuität des Keimplasmas als Grundlage einer Theorie der Vererbung. Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  16. Weismann A (1892) Das Keimplasma: Eine Theorie der Vererbung. Fischer, Jena (Englisch edition 1893)Google Scholar
  17. Wilson EB (1983) Amphioxus, and the mosaic theory of development. J Morphol 8:579–617Google Scholar
  18. Wilson EB (1896) The cell in development and inheritance. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Sander

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations