Advertisement

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 112, Issue 4, pp 163–166 | Cite as

Cellular and humoral immune responses after fresh meniscal allografts in mice

A preliminary report
  • M. Ochi
  • Y. Ikuta
  • O. Ishida
  • M. Akiyama
Original Articles

Summary

To date, no study of allogeneic meniscal transplantation has investigated both the host cellular immune response and the humoral immune response. Using inbred mice, we examined cellular immunity to meniscal allografts by assaying mixed lymphocyte culture and investigated humoral immunity through a complement-dependent cytotoxity test. The level of the stimulation index of the mixed lymphocyte culture seen after placing fresh meniscal allografts subcutaneously was not significantly higher than when isograft controls were similarly placed. Following placement of the allografts, no specific antibodies were detected in serum throughout the 24-week period after grafting. Thus, in mice, fresh meniscus apparently is not immunogenic. Our results tentatively suggest that a fresh allogeneic meniscus might be transplanted without any special treatment to decrease its immunogenicity.

Keywords

Special Treatment Specific Antibody Humoral Immune Response Cellular Immune Response Cellular Immunity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Appel H (1970) Late results after meniscectomy in the knee joint: a clinical and roentgenologic follow-up investigation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 133:1–111Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnoczky SP, Warren RF, McDevitt CA (1990) Meniscal replacement using a cryopreserved allograft. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Orthop 252:121–128Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnoczky SP, McDevitt CA, Schmidt MB, Mow VC, Warren RF (1988) The effect of cryopreservation on canine menisci: a biochemical, morphologic and biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Res 6:1–12Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bach FH, Widmer MB, Bach ML, Klein J (1972) Serologically defined and lymphocyte defined components of the major histocompatibility complex in the mouse. J Exp Med 136:1430–1444Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canham W, Stanish W (1986) A study of biological behavior of the meniscus as a transplant in the medial compartment of a dog's knee. Am J Sports Med 14:376–379Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cassidy RE, Shaffer AJ (1981) Repair of peripheral meniscus tears. A preliminary report. Am J Sports Med 9:209–214Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chesterman PJ, Smith AU (1968) Homotransplantation of articular cartilage and isolated chondrocytes: an experimental study in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 50:184–197Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cox JS, Cordell LD (1977) The degenerative effects of medial meniscus tears in dog knees. Clin Orthop 125:236–242Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DiFerrante N, Donnelly PV, Sajdera SW (1972) A segregated antigen in cartilage matrix. J Lab Clin Med 80:364–372Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elves MW (1974) A study of the transplantation antigens on chondrocytes from articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 56:178–185Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elves MW (1974) Humoral immune response to allografts of bone. Int Arch Allergy 47:708–715Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fairbank TJ (1948) Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 30:664–670Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghadially FN, Wedge JH, Lalonde J-MA (1986) Experimental methods of repairing injured menisci. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68:105–110Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hagerty RF, Braid HL, Bonner WM Jr, Hennigar GR, Lee WH Jr (1967) Viable and nonviable human cartilage homografts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 125:485–492Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishida O, Ochi M, Miyamoto Y, Ikuta Y, Akiyama M (1989) Suppression by cyclosporine of cellular and humoral reactivity after peripheral nerve allografts in mice. Transplantation 48:824–828Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keene GCR, Paterson RS, Teague DC (1987) Advances in arthroscopic surgery. Clin Orthop 224:64–70Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Langer F, Czitrom A, Pritzker KP, Gross AE (1975) The immunogenicity of fresh and frozen allogeneic bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57:216–220Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Milachowski KA, Weismeier K, Erhardt W, Remberger K (1987) Transplantation of meniscus: an experimental study in sheep. Sportverletz Sportschaden 1:20–26Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Milachowski KA, Weismeier K, Wirth CJ, Kohn D (1988) Meniscus transplantation. In: Müller W, Hackenbruch V (eds) Surgery and arthroscopy of the knee. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 380–388Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muir H, Baxter E, Brandt KD (1973) The antigenicity of extracellular proteoglycans: implications for structure and biosynthesis. Biochem Soc Trans 1:223–226Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muscolo DL, Kawai S, Ray RD (1976) Cellular and humoral immune response analysis of bone-allografted rats. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58:826–832Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmidt MB, Arnoczky SP, Mow VC, Warren RF (1986) Biomechanical evaluation of cryopreserved meniscal allografts (abstract). Orthop Trans 10:329–330Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith AU (1965) Survival of frozen chondrocytes isolated from cartilage of adult mammals. Nature 205:782–784Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tapper EM, Hoover NW (1969) Late results after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 51:517–526Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Veth RPH, den Heeten GJ, Jansen HWB, Nielsen HKL (1983) An experimental study of reconstructive procedures in lesions of the meniscus. Use of synovial flaps and carbon fiber implants for artificially made lesions in the meniscus of the rabbit. Clin Orthop 181:250–254Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Veth RPH, Den Heeten GJ, Jansen HWB, Nielsen HKL (1983) Repair of the meniscus. An experimental investigation in rabbits. Clin Orthop 175:258–262Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Virolainen M, Hayry P, Defendi V (1969) Effect of presensitization of the mixed lymphocyte reaction of rat spleen cell cultures. Transplantation 8:179–188Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wilson DB, Silvers WK, Nowell PC (1967) Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. II. Relationship of the proliferative response to the immunologic status of the donors. J Exp Med 126:655–665Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Ochi
    • 1
  • Y. Ikuta
    • 1
  • O. Ishida
    • 1
  • M. Akiyama
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHiroshima University School of MedicineHiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiobiologyRadiation Effect Research FoundationHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations