Advertisement

Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 110, Issue 1, pp 111–115 | Cite as

Modern methods in the astrometry of double stars

  • Laurence W. Fredrick
Part II: Astrometric Binaries—Astrometry

Abstract

The techniques for studying double stars continue to evolve in a predictable way. The most recent major breakthroughs have been the area scanner and speckle interferometry. On the horizon looms the application of large format CCDs which will replace the photographic plate for many astrometric problems.

Keywords

Binary Star Photographic Plate Area Scanner Double Star Quantum Efficiency Detector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambronn, L.: 1899,Handbuch der Astronomischen Instrumentenkunde 2, 521ff. Springer Verlag, Berlin.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. A.: 1920,Astrophys. J. 51, 263.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bessel, F. W.: 1844,Astron. Nachr. 22, 145.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis, J.: 1981, Chatterton Astron. Dept., School of Physics, Univ. of Sydney, Australia (preprint).Google Scholar
  5. Finsen, W. S.: 1951,Union Obs. Circ., No. 112.Google Scholar
  6. Gatewood, G., Breakiron, L., Goebel, R., Kipp, S., Russell, J., and Stein, J.: 1980,Icarus 41, 205.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hanbury-Brown, R.: 1974,The Intensity Interferometer, Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
  8. Herbison-Evans, D., Hanbury-Brown, R., Davis, J., and Allan, L. R.: 1971,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 151, 161.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hertzsprung, E.: 1920,Publ. Astrophys. Obs. Potsdam 24, No. 75.Google Scholar
  10. Howell, R. R., McCarthy, D. W., and Low, F. J.: 1981,Astrophys. J. 251, L21.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, B. W.: 1981,Lick Obs. Ann. Report.Google Scholar
  12. Labeyrie, A.: 1970,Astron. Astrophys. 6, 85.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Labeyrie, A.: 1975,Astrophys. J. 196, L71.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lippincott, S. L.: 1951,Astrophys. J. 55, 236.ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Lippincott, S. L.: 1955,Astrophys. J. 60, 379.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Mertz, L.: 1971,Optica Acata 18, 51.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Michelson, A. A.: 1920,Astrophys. J. 51, 257.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rakos, K. D.: 1965,Appl. Opt. 4, 1453.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reuyl, D.: 1936,Astrophys. J. 45, 144.Google Scholar
  20. Schlesinger, F.: 1910,Astrophys. J. 32, 372.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shao, M. and Staelin, D. H.: 1980,Appl. Opt. 19, 1519.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sinton, W. M.: 1954,Astrophys. J. 59, 369.ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. van Altena, W.: 1974, in W. Gliese, C. A. Murray, and R. H. Tucker (eds.), ‘New Problems in Astrometry’,IAU Symp. 61, 311.Google Scholar
  24. Villamediana, J. F. and Fredrick, L. W.: 1971,Proc. IAU Colloq. 11, 95.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence W. Fredrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Leander McCormick ObservatoryUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations