Advertisement

Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 135, Issue 4, pp 341–348 | Cite as

The function and role of two types of mechanoreceptive ‘free’ nerve endings in the head skin of amphibian embryos

  • Alan Roberts
Article

Summary

The properties of trigeminal ganglion sensory neurones innervating the head skin of lateXenopus laevis embryos have been studied using extracellular recordings. Two types of mechanosensory neurones were found:Rapid-transient detectors which responded with few impulses to rapid, local, indentation of the skin with a fine probe (10–25 μm diameter), andMovement detectors which responded with a slowly adapting discharge to even very slow distortion of the skin (5 μm· s−1) with small or large probes. Receptive fields over the whole head surface as far back as the gill rudiments were plotted for both types of neurone. The areas for the two types were similar (means of 0.015 mm2 for rapid-transient and 0.017 mm2 for movement).

Comparative observations on embryos ofRana temporaria andTriturus helveticus showed a very similar division of trigeminal sensory neurones into two types. InXenopus embryos stimuli which only excite the movement detectors were found to have inhibitory effects on behaviour. They would stop swimming and responses to other excitatory stimuli. Stimuli which excited the rapid-transient detectors normally evoked swimming. The division of the somatosensory system inXenopus embryos into two subsystems with different sensitivities and inhibitory, or excitatory effects on behaviour is discussed and related to findings in other groups of animals.

Keywords

Sensory Neurone Receptive Field Nerve Ending Trigeminal Ganglion Movement Detector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burgess, P.R., Perl, E.R.: Cutaneous mechanoreceptors and nociceptors. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. II. Iggo, A. (ed.), pp. 29–78. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1973Google Scholar
  2. Cambar, R., Marrot, Br.: Table chronologique du développement de la grenouille agile (Rana dalmatina Bon.). Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg.88, 168–177 (1954)Google Scholar
  3. Corner, M.: Rhythmicity in the early swimming anuran larvae. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.12, 665–671 (1964)Google Scholar
  4. Gallien, L., Bidaud, O.: Table chronologique du développement chezTriturus helveticus Razonmowsky. Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr.84, 22–32 (1959)Google Scholar
  5. Gray, J., Lissmann, H.W., Pumphrey, R.J.: The mechanism of locomotion in the leech (Hirudo medicinalis Ray). J. Exp. Biol.15, 408–430 (1938)Google Scholar
  6. Gray, J., Sand, A.: Spinal reflexes in the Dogfish,Scyllium canicula. J. Exp. Biol.13, 210–218 (1936)Google Scholar
  7. Hunt, C.C., McIntyre, A.K.J.: Properties of cutaneous touch receptors in cat. J. Physiol. (London)153, 88–98 (1960a)Google Scholar
  8. Hunt, C.C., McIntyre, A.K.J.: An analysis of fibre diameter and receptor characteristics of myelinated cutaneous afferent fibres in cat. J. Physiol. (London)153, 99–112 (1960b)Google Scholar
  9. Magni, F., Pellegrino, M.: Neural mechanisms underlying the segmentai and generalized shortening reflexes in the leech. J. Comp. Physiol.124, 339–351 (1978)Google Scholar
  10. Martin, A.R., Wickelgren, W.O.: Sensory cells in the spinal cord of the sea lamprey. J. Physiol. (London)212, 65–83 (1971)Google Scholar
  11. Matthews, G., Wickelgren, W.O.: Trigeminal sensory neurons of the Sea Lamprey. J. Comp. Physiol.123, 329–333 (1978)Google Scholar
  12. Nicholls, J.G., Baylor, D.A.: Specific modalities and receptive fields of sensory neurons in CNS of the leech. J. Neurophysiol.31, 740–756 (1968)Google Scholar
  13. Nieuwkoop, P.D., Faber, J.: Normal tables ofXenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. 1956Google Scholar
  14. Roberts, A.: The role of propagated skin impulses in the sensory system of young tadpoles. Z. Vergl. Physiol.75, 388–401 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Roberts, A.: Mechanisms for the excitation of ‘free nerve endings ’. Nature253, 737–738 (1975)Google Scholar
  16. Roberts, A.: Pineal eye and behaviour inXenopus tadpoles. Nature273, 774–775 (1978)Google Scholar
  17. Roberts, A., Blight, A.R.: Anatomy, physiology and behavioural role of sensory nerve endings in the cement gland of embryonicXenopus. Proc. R. Soc. (London) (Biol.)192, 111–127 (1975)Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, A., Hayes, B.P.: The anatomy and function of ‘free’ nerve endings in an amphibian skin sensory system. Proc. R. Soc. (London) (Biol.)196, 415–429 (1977)Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, A., Smyth, D.: The development of a dual touch sensory system in embryos of the amphibianXenopus laevis. J. Comp. Physiol.88, 31–42 (1974)Google Scholar
  20. Roberts, A., Stirling, C.A.: The properties and propagation of a cardiac-like impulse in the skin of young tadpoles. Z. Vergl. Physiol.71, 295–310 (1971)Google Scholar
  21. Whiting, H.P.: A study of the development of behaviour and of nervous structure in the embryos of fishes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (1940)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of BristolBristolGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations