Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads

  • H. Carl Gerhardt
Article

Summary

Sound pressure levels of the vocalizations of 21 species of North American anurans were measured in the field. In most species the peak levels at 50 cm in front of the male exceeded 100 dBre 2×10−4 μbar (Table 2). The sound pressure levels of the calls of most individuals varied by less than 2.5 dB, but intraspecific variation was significantly higher, averaging about 8.5 dB (Tables 1, 2). Sound pressure levels of mating calls were positively correlated with body size in the toad,Bufo americanus (Fig. 2); however, interspecific differences in sound pressure levels were not clearly related to interspecific differences in body size. Measurements of directivity patterns indicated that sound fields around three males ofHyla crucifer were uniform, whereas two males ofH. chrysoscelis represented directional sound sources (Table 3).

Keywords

Radiation Body Size Pressure Level Sound Pressure Peak Level 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aylor, D.: Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.51, 197–205 (1972)Google Scholar
  2. Beranek, L.: Acoustics. New York: McGraw-Hill Company 1954Google Scholar
  3. Beranek, L.: Noise and vibration control. New York: McGraw-Hill Company, 1971Google Scholar
  4. Blair, W. F.: Mating call and stage of speciation in theMicrohyla olivacea-M. carolinensis complex. Evol.9, 469–480 (1955)Google Scholar
  5. Blair, W. F.: Mating call in the speciation of anuran amphibians. Amer. Natur.92, 27–51 (1958a)Google Scholar
  6. Blair, W. F.: Call structure and species groups in U.S. treefrogs (Hyla). S. W. Natur.3, 77–89 (1958b)Google Scholar
  7. Blair, W. F.: Call difference as an isolating mechanism in Florida species of hylid frogs. Quart. J. Fla. Acad. Sci.21, 32–48 (1959)Google Scholar
  8. Blair, W. F., Littlejohn, M. J.: Stage of speciation of two allopatric populations of chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Evol.14, 87 (1960)Google Scholar
  9. Bogert, C. M.: The influence of sound on behavior of amphibians and reptiles. In: Lanyon, W., and W. Tavolga (eds.), Animal sounds and communication. A.I.B.S. Special Publ.7, 137–320 (1960)Google Scholar
  10. Capranica, R. R.: Vocal response of the bullfrog to natural and synthetic mating calls. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.40, 1131–1139 (1966)Google Scholar
  11. Capranica, R., Frishkopf, L. S., Nevo, E.: Encoding of geographic dialects in the auditory system of the cricket frog. Science182, 1272–1275 (1973)Google Scholar
  12. DuMortier, B.: The physical characteristics of sound emission in Arthropoda. In: Busnel (ed.), Acoustic behaviour of animals. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1963Google Scholar
  13. Gerhardt, H. C.: Reproductive interactions betweenHyla crucifer andPseudacris ornata (Anura: Hylidae). Amer. Midl. Natur.89, 81–88 (1973)Google Scholar
  14. Gerhardt, H. C.: Vocalizations of some hybrid treefrogs: acoustic and behavioural analyses. Behav.49, 130–151 (1974a)Google Scholar
  15. Gerhardt, H. C.: The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). J. exp. Biol.61, 229–241 (1974b)Google Scholar
  16. Griffin, D. R.: Listening in the dark. New Haven: Yale University Press, Inc. 1958Google Scholar
  17. Griffin, D. R., Hopkins, C. D.: Sounds audible to migrating birds. Anim. Behav.22, 672–678 (1974)Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, C.: Genetic incompatibility in the call races ofHyla versicolor Le Conte in Texas. Copeia1959, 327–335 (1959)Google Scholar
  19. Loftus-Hills, J. J., Littlejohn, M. J.: Mating-call sound intensities of anuran amphibians. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.49, 1327–1329 (1971)Google Scholar
  20. Peterson, A. P., Gross, E.: Handbook of noise measurement. 7th ed. West Concord, Massachusetts: General Radio Company 1972Google Scholar
  21. Simmons, J. A.: Acoustic radiation patterns for the echolocating batsChilonycteris rubiginosa andEptesicus fuscus. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.44, 1054–1056 (1969)Google Scholar
  22. Skudrzyk, E.: The foundations of acoustics: Basic mathematics and basic acoustics. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1971Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Carl Gerhardt
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations