Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 398, Issue 3, pp 179–188 | Cite as

Noise analysis of inward and outward Na+ currents across the apical border of ouabain-treated frog skin

  • Willy Van Driessche
  • David Erlij


The passive Na+ transport across the apical membrane of frog skin (Rana catesbeiana) was studied under the following circumstances: (1) control conditions (sulfate Ringer's, K+ depolarised serosal membranes); (2) after blocking the active transport step with ouabain; (3) with an outward oriented Na+ current. The amiloride-induced Na+ current fluctuations were analysed to calculated the density of amiloride blockable channels and the current through one single channel. Despite the large reduction of the macroscopic current by oubain, the single channel current remained unchanged, while the number of amiloride blockable Na+ channels was reduced by a factor of eight. It is concluded from these observations that the earlier described reduction of the permeability of the apical membrane is caused by a decrease of the number of electrically conductive Na+ channels. The outward oriented single channel currents were less than 50% of the currents in the opposite direction. After ouabain, the number of Na+ channels was independent from the current direction.

Key words

Frog skin Fluctuation analysis Ouabain Amiloride Apical membrane permeability Na+ channel Outward current 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkins GL, Nimmo IA (1975) A comparison of seven methods for fitting the Michaelis-Menten equation. Biochem J 149: 775–777Google Scholar
  2. Benos DJ, Mandel LJ, Balaban RS (1979) On the mechanism of amiloride-sodium entry site interaction in anuran skin epithelia. J Gen Physiol 73: 307–326Google Scholar
  3. Biber TUL (1971) Effects of changes in transepithelial transport on the uptake of sodium across the outer surface of the frog skin. J Gen Physiol 58: 131–144Google Scholar
  4. Chase HS, Al-Awqati Q (1981) Regulation of the sodium permeability of the luminal border of toad bladder by intracellular sodium and calcium. J Gen Physiol 77: 693–712Google Scholar
  5. Cooley JW, Lewis PAW, Welch PD (1967) The fast Fourier transform and its applications. IBM Research, RC 1743, pp 15–33Google Scholar
  6. Cuthbert AW, Shum WK (1977) Does intracellular sodium modify membrane permeability to sodium ions? Nature 266: 468–469Google Scholar
  7. Eisenthal R, Cornish-Bowden A (1974) The direct linear plot. A new graphical procedure for estimating enzyme kinetic parameters. Biochem J 139: 715–720Google Scholar
  8. Erlij D, Smith MW (1973) Sodium uptake by frog skin and its modification by inhibitors of transepithelial sodium transport. J Physiol (Lond) 228: 221–239Google Scholar
  9. Erlij D, Ussing HH (1978) Transport across amphibian skin. In: Giebisch G, Tosteson DC, Ussing HH (eds) Membrane transport in biology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 175–208Google Scholar
  10. Farquhar MG, Palade GE (1966) Adenosine triphosphate localization in amphibian epidermis. J Cell Biol 30: 359–379Google Scholar
  11. Gögelein H, Van Driessche W (1981) Noise analysis of K+ current through the apical membrane of necturus gallbladder. J Membr Biol 60: 187–198Google Scholar
  12. Grinstein S, Erlij D (1978) Intracellular calcium and the regulation of sodium transport in the frog skin. Proc R Soc Lond B 202: 353–360Google Scholar
  13. Helman SI, Cox TC, Van Driessche W (1983) Hormonal control of apical membrane Na transport in epithelia: studies with fluctuation analysis. J Gen Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Helman SI, Fisher RS (1977) Microelectrode studies of the active Na transport pathway of frog skin. J Gen Physiol 69: 571–604Google Scholar
  15. Helman SI, Miller D (1971) In vitro techniques for avoiding edge damage in studies of frog skin. Science 173: 146–148Google Scholar
  16. Helman SI, Nagel W, Fisher RS (1979) Ouabain on active transepithelial sodium transport in frog skin. J Gen Physiol 74: 105–127Google Scholar
  17. Koefoed-Johnsen V (1957) The effect of g-strophanthin (ouabain) on the active transport through the isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand 42 (Suppl 145): 87–88Google Scholar
  18. Koefoed-Johnsen V, Ussing HH (1958) The nature of the frog skin potential. Acta Physiol Scand 42: 298–308Google Scholar
  19. Leblanc G, Morel F (1975) Na and K movements across the membranes of frog skin epithelial associated with transient current changes. Pflügers Arch 358: 159–177Google Scholar
  20. Li JHY, Lindemann B (1980) Passage of Li-ions through amilorideblockable Na+-channels in the apical membrane of frog skin. Pflügers Arch 389: R41Google Scholar
  21. Li JHY, Lindemann B (1982) Movement of Na and Li across the apical membrane of frog skin. In: Emrich HM, Aldenhoff JB, Lux HD (eds) Basic mechanisms in the action of lithium. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 28–35Google Scholar
  22. Lindemann B, Van Driessche W (1977) Sodium-specific membrane channels of frog skin are pores: Current fluctuations reveal high turnover. Science 195: 292–294Google Scholar
  23. Lindemann B, Van Driessche W (1978) The mechanism of Na uptake through Na-selective channels in the epithelium of frog skin. In: Hoffmann JF (ed) Membrane transport processes. Raven Press, New York pp 155–178Google Scholar
  24. Mills JW, Ernst SA, DiBona DR (1977) Localization of Na+ pump sites in frog skin. J Cell Biol 73: 88–110Google Scholar
  25. Nagel W (1980) Rheogenic sodium transport in a tight epithelium, the amphibian skin. J Physiol 302: 281–295Google Scholar
  26. Nagel W, Garcia-Diaz JF, Armstrong WMcD (1981) Intracellular ionic activities in frog skin. J Membr Biol 61: 127–134Google Scholar
  27. Neumcke B (1975) 1/f membrane noise generated by diffusion processes in unstirred solution layers. Biophys Struct Mech 1: 295–309Google Scholar
  28. Neumcke B (1978) 1/f noise in membranes. Biophys Struct Mech 4: 179–199Google Scholar
  29. Rick R, Dörge A, von Arnim E, Thurau K (1978) Electron microprobe analysis of frog skin epithelium: evidence for a syncytial sodium transport compartment. J Membr Biol 39: 313–331Google Scholar
  30. Sachs S (1972) Statistische Auswertungsmethoden. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Schoen H, Erlij D (1983) Effects of ouabain on the apical and basolateral membranes of frog skin. Fed Proc 42: 1101Google Scholar
  32. Schultz SG (1981) Homocellular regulatory mechanisms in sodium-transporting epithelia: avoidance of extinction by “flush-through”. Am J Physiol 241: F579-F590Google Scholar
  33. Shum WK, Fanelli GM (1978) Does intracellular sodium regulate sodium transport across the mucosal surface of frog skin. BBA 512: 593–597Google Scholar
  34. Tang J, Helman SI (1983) Electrical parameters of apical and basolateral membranes of R. pipiens depolarized by 100 mM [K]i. Fed Proc 42: 1101Google Scholar
  35. Van Driessche W, Lindemann B (1978) Low-noise amplification of voltage and current fluctuations arising in epithelia. Rev Sci Instrum 49: 52–57Google Scholar
  36. Van Driessche W, Lindemann B (1979) Concentration dependence of currents through single sodium-selective pores in frog skin. Nature 282: 519–520Google Scholar
  37. Van Driessche W, Gogelein H (1980) Attenuation of current and voltage noise signals recorded from epithelia. J Theor Biol 86: 629–648Google Scholar
  38. Van Driessche W, Gullentops K (1982) Conductance fluctuations analysis in epithelia. In: Baker PF (ed) Techniques in the life sciences, techniques in cellular physiology, part II, vol P1/II. Elsevier/North Holland, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Driessche W, Zeiske W (1980) Ba2+-induced conductance fluctuations of spontaneously fluctuating K+ channels in the apical membrane of frog skin (Rana temporaria). J Membr Biol 56: 31–42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willy Van Driessche
    • 1
  • David Erlij
    • 2
  1. 1.Labo voor FysiologieLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologySUNY Down State Medical CenterBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations