Evidence for celestial and magnetic compass orientation in lake migrating sockeye salmon fry

Summary

  1. 1.

    Radially symmetrical, four-armed tanks were designed for testing the directional preferences of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) fry as they commenced up-lake migrations following emergence from gravel nests and river migration to the lake.

  2. 2.

    When tested during the day or night, as appropriate for their migration, fry from two different stocks moved in compass directions corresponding to the directions which they would have to maintain in their up-lake migration.

  3. 3.

    The directional preferences of one population tested during the non-migratory time of day apparently corresponded to the fry's onshore movement.

  4. 4.

    Orientation was maintained under both overcast and clear skies, and under plastic covers as well. A 90° counter-clockwise shift in the horizontal component of the earth's magnetic field was associated with approximately 90° changes in the mean direction of movement of fry at night, even when they were given a view of the sky. During the day, only fish tested in covered tanks displayed redirected movements in the altered field; those tested with a view of the sky showed geographically appropriate movement patterns despite the shifted field.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Batschelet, E.: Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms. Washington, D.C.: Am. Inst. Biol. Sci. 1965

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bodznick, D.: Water source preference and lakeward migration of sockeye salmon fry (Oncorhynchus nerka). J. Comp. Physiol.127, 139–146 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brannon, E.L.: Mechanisms controlling migration of sockeye salmon fry. Int. Pac. Salmon Fish. Commission Bull.21, 86 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davitz, M.A., McKaye, K.R.: Discrimination between horizontally and vertically polarized light by the cichlid fishPseudotropheus macrophthalmus. Copeia1978, 333–334 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson, J.J.: Determination of seasonal distribution of juvenile sockeye salmon in Lake Washington by means of acoustics. M. Sci. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dill, P.A.: Perception of polarized light by yearling sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can.28, 1319–1332 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forward, R.B., Horch, K.W., Waterman, T.H.: Visual orientation at the water surface by the teleostZenarchopterus. Biol. Bull.143, 112–126 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frankel, R.B., Blakemore, R.P., Wolfe, R.S.: Magnetite in fresh-water magnetotactic bacteria. Science203, 1355–1356 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodyear, C.P.: Terrestrial and aquatic orientation in the starhead topminnow,Fundulus notti. Science168, 603–605 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goodyear, C.P., Ferguson, D.E.: Sun-compass orientation in the mosquitofish,Gambusia affinis. Anim. Behav.17, 636–640 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groot, C.: On the orientation of young salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) during their seaward migration out of lakes. Behav. Suppl.14, 198 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hasler, A.D., Horrall, R.M., Wisby, W.J., Braemer, W.: Sunorientation and homing fishes. Limnol. Oceanogr.3, 353–361 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hasler, A.D., Scholz, A.T., Horrall, R.M.: Olfactory imprinting and homing in salmon. Am. Sci.66, 347–355 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalmijn, A.: Experimental evidence of geomagnetic orientation in elasmobranch fishes. In: Animal migration, navigation, and homing. Schmidt-Koenig, K., Keeton, W.T. (eds.), pp. 347–353. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1978

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keeton, W.T.: Magnets interfere with pigeon homing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA68, 102–106 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kolb, R.: A review of Lake Washington sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) age and racial characteristics as determined by scale analysis. Unpublished report, State of Washington, Dept. of Fisheries (1971)

  17. Kreithen, M.L.: Sensory mechanisms for animal orientation — can any new ones be discovered? In: Animal migration, navigation, and homing. Schmidt-Koenig, K., Keeton, W.T. (eds.), pp. 25–34. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1978

    Google Scholar 

  18. Loyacano, H.A., Chappell, J.A., Gauthreaux, S.A.: Sun-compass orientation in juvenile largemouth bass,Micropterus salmoides. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.106, 77–79 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neave, F.: Ocean migrations of Pacific salmon. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can.21, 1227–1244 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Phillips, J.B.: Use of the earth's magnetic field by orienting cave salamanders (Eurycea lucifuga). J. Comp. Physiol.121, 273–288 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Royce, W.F., Smith, L.S., Hartt, A.C.: Models of oceanic migrations of Pacific salmon and comments on guidance mechanisms. Fish. Bull. U.S.66, 441–462 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rubens, S.M.: Cube-surface coil for producing a uniform magnetic field. Rev. Sci. Instrum.16, 243–245 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt-Koenig, K.: Migration and homing in animals. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1975

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tesch, F.-W.: Influence of geomagnetism and salinity on the directional choice of eels. Helgol. Wiss. Meeresunters.26, 382–395 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Traynor, J.J.: Seasonal changes in the abundance, size, biomass, production and distribution of the pelagic fish species in Lake Washington. M. Sci. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  26. United States Dept. of Commerce: NOAA's Climatological Data, National Summary21(13) (1970)

  27. Walcott, C., Gould, J.L., Kirschvink, J.L.: Pigeons have magnets. Science205, 1027–1029 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wiltschko, W., Wiltschko, R.: Magnetic compass of European robins. Science176, 62–64 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wiltschko, R., Wiltschko, W.: Relative importance of stars and the magnetic field for the accuracy of orientation in nightmigrating birds. Oikos30, 195–206 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Winn, H.E., Salmon, M., Roberts, N.: Sun-compass orientation by parrot fishes. Z. Tierpsychol.21, 798–812 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Woodey, J.C.: Distribution, feeding, and growth of juvenile sock-eye salmon in Lake Washington. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle (1972)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank Dr. Ernest Brannon, whose knowledge of sockeye salmon biology and encouragement were essential in carrying out the study. Dr. Ronald Merrill provided valuable advice and criticism, especially concerning the theory and design of magnetic field altering equipment. Asko Hamalainen of the University of Washington's Fisheries Research Institute, and Clarence Miller and Forrest Scott of the International Pacific Salmon Fisheries Commission assisted with the fry collection and field work. Funds were provided by the Washington Sea Grant Program under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce to Dr. Brannon. Drs. Brannon, Merrill and Theodore Pietsch criticized the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quinn, T.P. Evidence for celestial and magnetic compass orientation in lake migrating sockeye salmon fry. J. Comp. Physiol. 137, 243–248 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00657119

Download citation

Keywords

  • Migration
  • Gravel
  • Movement Pattern
  • Horizontal Component
  • Directional Preference