Advertisement

Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 124, Issue 3, pp 211–224 | Cite as

The jamming avoidance response in gymnotoid pulse-species: A mechanism to minimize the probability of pulse-train coincidence

  • Walter Heiligenberg
  • Curtis Baker
  • Joseph Bastian
Article

Summary

Gymnotoid electric fish with pulse-type electric organ discharges (EODs) shorten (lengthen) their EOD intervals as pulses of a slightly slower (faster) train scan their EODs (Figs. 1, 2). They thus minimize the chance of pulse coincidence by transient accelerations (decelerations) of their EOD rate.

Studies in curarized preparations demonstrate that this Jamming Avoidance Response (JAR) is controlled by electroreceptive input alone and without reference to an internal electric organ pacemaker-related signal (Fig. 8). A sufficient stimulus input consists of a train of strong, EOD-like stimulus pulses (S1), which mimic the animal's experience of its own EOD, and a train of small pulses (S2) of slightly different repetition rate, which mimic EODs of a neighbor. Correct behavioral responses require S1 pulses of sufficient intensity to recruit pulse-markertype receptors; also spatial and temporal patterns must closely resemble those of the animal's EOD. These features are of little significance for S2 pulses which, while scanning S1 pulses, only provide a small perturbation of electroreceptive feedback from S1 pulses. Inappropriate S1 stimulation impairs and sometimes reverses (Fig. 7) the behavioral discrimination of scan directions. The JAR is explained in terms of excitatory and inhibitory processes (Fig. 3) which are triggered by S2 stimulation, at specific phases within the S1 cycle (Figs. 4–6).

The JAR in pulse species strongly resembles the JAR in wave-species (Bullock et al., 1972) and could be considered an evolutionary ancestor of the latter. It is a response to a particular novelty in electroreceptive feedback.

Keywords

Electric Organ Electric Organ Discharge Stimulus Input Electric Fish Stimulus Pulse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bastian, J.: Frequency response characteristics of electroreceptors in weakly electric fish (Gymnotoidei) with a pulse discharge. J. comp. Physiol.112, 165–180 (1976)Google Scholar
  2. Bastian, J.: Variations in the frequency response of electroreceptors dependent on receptor location in weakly electric fish (Gymnotoidei) with a pulse discharge. J. comp. Physiol.121, 53–64 (1977)Google Scholar
  3. Bell, C.C., Bradbury, J., Russell, C.J.: The electric organ of the mormyrid as a current and voltage source. J. comp. Physiol.110, 65–88 (1976)Google Scholar
  4. Bell, C.C., Myers, J.P., Russell, C.J.: Electric organ discharge patterns during dominance-related behavioral displays inGnathonemus petersii. J. comp. Physiol.92, 201–228 (1974)Google Scholar
  5. Bullock, T.H.: Spcies differences of electroreceptor input on electric organ pacemakers and other aspects of behavior in electric fish. Brain Behav. Evol.2, 85–118 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Bullock, T.H.: General introduction. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. III/3 (ed. A. Fessard), pp. 1–12. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974Google Scholar
  7. Bullock, T.H., Behrend, K., Heiligenberg, W.: Comparison of the jamming avoidance response in gymnotoid and gymnarchid electric fish: A case of convergent evolution of behavior and its sensory basis. J. comp. Physiol.103, 97–121 (1975)Google Scholar
  8. Bullock, T.H., Hamstra, R.H., Scheich, H.: The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fish. J. comp. Physiol.77, 1–48 (1972)Google Scholar
  9. Dowben, R.M., Rose, J.E.: A metal-filled microelectrode. Science118, 22–24 (1953)Google Scholar
  10. Heiligenberg, W.: Electrolocation of objects in the electric fish,Eigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei). J. comp. Physiol.87, 137–164 (1973)Google Scholar
  11. Heiligenberg, W.: Electrolocation and jamming avoidance in aHypopygus (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei), an electric fish with pulse-type discharges. J. comp. Physiol.91, 223–240 (1974)Google Scholar
  12. Heiligenberg, W.: Electrolocation and jamming avoidance in the mormyrid fishBrienomyrus. J. comp. Physiol.109, 357–372 (1976)Google Scholar
  13. Heiligenberg, W.: Principles of electrolocation and jamming avoidance in electric fish. Studies of brain function, Vol. 1, pp. 1–85. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1977Google Scholar
  14. Heiligenberg, W., Altes, R.: Phase sensitivity in electroreception. Science, in press (1977)Google Scholar
  15. Heiligenberg, W., Bastian, J.: Species specificity of electric organ discharges in sympatric gymnotoid fish of the Rio Negro and Solimoes/Brasil. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., submitted (1977)Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins, C.D.: Electric communication in fish. Amer. Scient.62, 426–437 (1974)Google Scholar
  17. Hopkins, C.D.: Stimulus filtering and electroreception: Tuberous electroreceptors in three species of gymnotoid fish. J. comp. Physiol.111, 171–208 (1976)Google Scholar
  18. Hopkins, C.D., Heiligenberg, W.: Evolutionary designs for electric signals and electroreceptors in gymnotoid fishes of Surinam. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., in press (1978)Google Scholar
  19. Kramer, B.: Electric organ discharge interaction during interspecific agonistic behavior in freely swimming mormyrid fish. A method to evaluate two or more. J. comp. Physiol.93, 203–236 (1974)Google Scholar
  20. Knudsen, E.: Spatial aspects of electric fields generated by weakly electric fish. J. comp. Physiol.99, 103–118 (1975)Google Scholar
  21. Lissmann, H.W.: On the function and evolution of electric organs in fish. J. exp. Biol.35, 156–191 (1958)Google Scholar
  22. MacDonald, J.A., Larimer, J.L.: Phase-sensitivity ofGymnotus carapo to low amplitude eletrical stimuli. Z. vergl. Physiol.70, 322–334 (1970)Google Scholar
  23. Russell, C.J., Myers, J.P., Bell, C.C.: The echo response inGnathonemus petersii (Mormyridae). J. comp. Physiol.92, 181–200 (1974)Google Scholar
  24. Scheich, H.: Neural basis of communication in the high frequency electric fishEigenmannia virescens (Jamming Avoidance Response). J. comp. Physiol.113, 181–255 (1977)Google Scholar
  25. Scheich, H., Bullock, T.H.: The detection of electric fields from electric organs. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. III/3 (ed. A. Fessard), pp. 201–256. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974Google Scholar
  26. Scheich, H., Gottschalk, B., Nickel, B.: The jamming avoidance response inRhamphichthys rostratus: An alternative principle of time domain analysis in electric fish. Exp. rain Res.28, 229–233 (1977)Google Scholar
  27. Schlegel, P.: Electroreceptive single units in the magnocellular mesencephalic nucleus of the weakly electric fishGymnotus carapo. Exp. Brain Res.29, 201–218 (1977)Google Scholar
  28. Szabo, T.: Anatomy of the specialized lateral line organs of electroreception. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. III/3 (ed. A. Fessard), pp. 13–58. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974Google Scholar
  29. Szabo, T., Fessard, A.: Physiology of electroreceptors. In: Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. III/3 (ed. A. Fessard), pp. 59–124. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974Google Scholar
  30. Szabo, T., Sakata, H., Ravaille, M.: An electrotonically coupled pathway in the central nervous system of some teleost fish, Gymnotidae and Mormyridae. Brain Res.95, 459–474 (1975)Google Scholar
  31. Watanabe, A., Takeda, K.: The change of discharge frequency by A.C. stimulus in a weakly electric fish. J. exp. Biol.40, 57–66 (1963)Google Scholar
  32. Westby, G.W.M.: Has the latency-dependent response ofGymnotus carapo to discharge-triggered stimuli a bearing on electric fish communication? J. comp. Physiol.96, 307–341 (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Heiligenberg
    • 1
  • Curtis Baker
    • 1
  • Joseph Bastian
    • 2
  1. 1.Neurobiology Unit, Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California at San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations