Summary
-
1.
Ecdysis in the cricket is a highly stereotyped, long-lasting (4 h) behavior, which is composed of independently controlled behavioral components (Motor Programs), of which 48 have been described (Table 1).
-
2.
Motor programs are recruited in a stereotyped sequence, are active during coincident periods, and terminate when their individual tasks are complete (Figs. 2, 3, and Tables 3, 4).
-
3.
Some motor programs are recruited a second time and associate with new sets of concurrently active motor programs. Others areoptional and can be deleted occasionally.Alternative programs are recruited when ecdysis takes place on a horizontal surface, andbackup programs complete tasks failed by earlier programs.
-
4.
Bilateral motor program coordination is symmetric, asymmetric, or alternating, and longitudinal is either synchronous or sequential.
-
5.
The behavior occurs as discreteBouts of activity separated by periods of quiescence.
-
6.
Anterior and posterior motor programs occur during mutually exclusive periods within each bout of activity during the Ecdysial Phase, and this facilitates cooperation between motor programs.
-
7.
Ecdysis is further divided into four functionally distinctPhases: (1) Preparatory (2 h) — anchors and loosens the old cuticle, (2) Ecdysial (20 min) — extricates the body, (3) Expansional (1 h) —inflates the new cuticle, and (4) Exuvial (30 min) — ingests the old cuticle to reclaim nutrients.
-
8.
The intensity of the behavior varies systematically, peaking during each of the four phases (Fig. 5), and declining during transitional periods.
-
9.
Sensory feedback from newly exposed cuticle controls the period of bouts of activity, and produces the peaks in intensity. Feedback of this sort also recruits and terminates motor programs.
-
10.
Complete peeling of the old cuticle 2 h before ecdysis does not trigger the behavior, however. After a 2 h delay, motor program recruitment begins, and the behavior progresses about half way to completion of the Ecdysial Phase before becomming arrested.
-
11.
Decapitation also fails to disrupt the normal sequence of motor program recruitment, although it does trigger one motor program (peristaltic abdominal waves) when performed at any time during the 4 h ecdysial period.
-
12.
The control of ecdysis is accomplished by a multilayered system of motor programs, a longitudinal bout structure, and four functionally distinct phases, in which both central and sensory elements cooperate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernays, E.A.: The intermediate moult (first ecdysis) ofSchislocerca gregaria (Forskal) (Insecta, Orthoptera). Z. Morph. Tiere71, 160–179 (1972)
Brocher, F.: Le méchanisme physiologique de la dernière mue des larves des agrionides. Ann. Biol. Lac.9, 183–200 (1919)
Cappe de Baillon, P.: Contribution anatomique et physiologique à l'étude de la reproduction chez les locustions et les grylloniens. II. La ponte et l'éclosion chez les grylloniens. Conclusions génerales. Cellule32, 1–193 (1920)
Carlson, J.R.: The imaginal ecdysis of the cricket (Teleogryllus oceaniens). II. The roles of identified motor units. J. comp. Physiol.115, 319–336 (1977)
Cottrell, C.B.: The imaginal ecdysis of blowflies. Observations on the hydrostatic mechanisms involved in digging and expansion. J. exp. Biol.39, 431–448 (1962)
De Bellesme, J.: Phénomènes qui accompagnent la métamorphose chez la libellule déprimée. C. Acad. Sci. (Paris)85, 448–450 (1877)
Knab, F.: Ecdysis in diptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash.13, 32–42 (1911)
Kunkel D'Herculais, J.: Du rôle de l'air dans le méchanisme physiologique de l'éclosion, des mues et de la métamorphose chez les insectes orthoptères de la famille des acridides. C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris)110, 657–659 (1890)
Portier, P.: Recherches physiologiques sur les insects aquatiques. Arch. de Zool.5, Sér. 8, 89–379 (1911)
Shafer, G.D.: The growth of dragonfly nymphs at the moult and between moults. Stanford Univ. Publ. Biol. Sci.3, 307–337 (1922)
Truman, J.W., Sokolove, P.G.: Silkmoth eclosion: Hormonal triggering of a centrally programmed behavior pattern. Science175, 1491 (1972)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
The author wishes to thank Dr. David Bentley, Dr. Howard Bern, and Dr. Rudolph Pipa for criticism of the manuscript, Alma Raymond, Kathy Luker, Richard Clark, Mick O'Shea, and Corey Goodman for advice and assistance, Sandy and Tim Sampson, and Karen Carlson for advice, help and moral support. Funds for these studies were provided by U.S. Public Health Service Training Grant USPHS-6M-1021, 1-404018-33687, NSF Grant BMS75-03450, and NIH Grant 2-Rol-NS-09074 to Dr. David Bentley, and Graduate Student Funds of the Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlson, J.R. The imaginal ecdysis of the cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus). J. Comp. Physiol. 115, 299–317 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00656847
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00656847
