Conclusions
-
1.
Heating to 525–950°C after austenitizing at 1050°C reduces substantially the stability of austenite. Destabilization of austenite is explained by a depletion of the solid solution in chromium and carbon by chromium carbide precipitation.
-
2.
Prolonged holding at room temperature after austenitizing or heating at up to 500°C stabilizes the austenite. The martensitic transformation after thermal stabilization has the following peculiarities: Undercooling of the austenite down to −196°C is possible at relatively slow cooling rates; the transformation of austenite to martensite proceeds isothermally after a certain in induction period. The effect of isothermal temperature and holding time on the transformation rate is represented by a curve showing a maximum.
-
3.
These rules do not apply to an ordinary martensitic transformation of unstabilized austenite.
-
4.
Thus, in thermally stabilized steel Kh15N9Yu the martensitic transformation proceeds so as to indicate that its kinetics is determined by the thermal vibrations of the atoms.
Thermal stabilization is associated with changes in the lattice structure the nature of which is obscure. A relaxation of stress peaks possibly takes place in small regions or else an annihilation of transformation nuclei.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ya. M. Potak, V. V. Sachkov and L. S. Popova,Metalloved. i Obrab. Metallov, 1960, #5, 24–30. [HB 5397]
J. T. Richards and E. M. Smith,Metal Progress, vol. 71, 1957, #5, 71–75.
R. W. White,Metal Progress, vol. 73, 1958, #6, 74–78.
B. L. Averbach and M. Cohen,Metal Technology, vol. 15, 1948, #2, 401–15; also—G. M. Rovenskii and M. I. Ermolova,Zavodskaya Laboratoriya, vol. 25, 1959.
B. Cina,Iron and Steel Inst., vol. 177, 1954, 406–422; also—R. Bungardt et al,Archiv Eisenhüttenwesen, vol. 24, 1953, #9/10, 423–30.
A. S. Tarantova, G. G. Solov'eva and L. M. Pevzner,Zavodskaya Laboratoriya, vol. 25, 1959, #9.
A. P. Gulyaev and A. P. Akshentseva,Zhurn. Tekhn. Fiz. vol. 25, 1955, #2, 299–312.
A. P. Gulyaev, Heat Treatment of Steel [Book, in Russian] Mashgiz Press, 1953.
G. V. Kurdyumov,Zhurn. Tekhn. Fiz. vol. 18, 1948, #8, p. 999–1025. [Available as HB Translation #2300, 2412 and 2423.]
G. V. Kurdyumov and O. P. Maksimova,Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, vol. 61, 1948, #1. Problems of Metal Science and Metal Physics, (Problemy Metalloved. i Fiz. Met.) #1–4.
O. P. Maksimova & A. I. Nikanorova, Problems of Metal Science and Metal Physics (Problemy Metalloved. i Fiz. Met.) No. 5, 1958.
C. H. Shin, B. L. Averbach and M. Cohen,Journal of Metals, vol. 7, 1955.
J. Philibert and C. Crussard,Journal Iron and Steel Inst., vol. 180, 1955, 39–50.
A. P. Gulyaev,Metallurg, vol. 15, 1940, #9, 43–50, [Available as HB Translation #1096].
V. S. Malyshev et al,Fizika Metal. i Metallov vol. 2, 1956, #2, 277–85.
E. R. Klien and A. R. Troiano,Transactions AIME, vol. 162, 1945;Metals Technology, vol. 12, Feb. 1945; Techn. Publication #1799 also P. Bastien and J. Dedieu,J. Iron and Steel Inst., vol. 183, 1956, 254–9.
G. V. Kurdyumov et al, Problems of Metal Science and Metal Physics, Symp. #5, 1958.
M. Cohen and W. Machlin, Symposium on Termodynamics in Physical Metallurgy, 1950.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kubyshkina, T.D., Pevzner, L.M. & Potak, Y.M. The martensitic transformation in stainless steels of the austenitic-martensitic class. Met Sci Heat Treat 2, 425–430 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00656472
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00656472