Conclusions
-
1.
After vibrational stresses the hardness and the second-order deformation of the crystal lattice are lower than in the case of static stress and higher than in the case of impact stress. The size of the blocks turns out to be the largest in the case of impact stress and smallest in the case of static stress.
-
2.
In the case of vibrational stress the deformation of the D16M alloy is more uniform than in the case of static stress.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
M. P. Arbuzov, FAN SSSR,74, No. 6 (1950).
L. I. Kysak, Voprosy fiziki metallov i metallovedeniya, No. 6 (1955).
N. Blacman, Phys. Rev.,70, Nos. 9–10 (1946).
Additional information
ÉNIKMASh Translated from Metallovedenie i Termicheskaya Obrabotka Metallov, No. 2, pp. 48–50, February, 1965
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sogrishin, Y.P., Tikhonov, L.V. & Chernis, T.S. Effect of the type of stress on the structures and mechanical properties of the D16M alloy. Met Sci Heat Treat 7, 119–121 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00655819
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00655819