Journal of Low Temperature Physics

, Volume 46, Issue 3–4, pp 383–386 | Cite as

Comment on: “Dc SQUID: Noise and optimization” by Tesche and Clarke

  • J. J. P. Bruines
  • V. J. de Waal
  • J. E. Mooij


Due to a numerical error, the computed noise energy of a dc SQUID, neglecting capacitance, as given by Tesche and Clarke is too small by a factor of about two.


Magnetic Material Numerical Error Noise Energy Compute Noise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    C. D. Tesche and J. Clarke,J. Low Temp. Phys. 29, 301 (1977).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. F. Voss, R. B. Laibowitz, A. N. Boers, S. I. Raider, C. M. Knoedler, and J. M. Viggiano,IEEE Trans. Mag. MAG-17, 395 (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. F. Voss, R. B. Laibowitz, M. B. Ketchen, and A. N. Broers, inProc. of the Second International Conference on Superconducting Quantum Devices (Berlin, 1981), p. 365.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. F. Voss, R. B. Laibowitz, S. I. Raider, and J. Clarke,J. Appl. Phys. 51, 2306 (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. B. Ketchen and R. F. Voss,Appl. Phys. Lett. 35, 812 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. H. Koch, D. J. van Harlingen, and J. Clarke,Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 2132 (1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. H. Koch, D. J. van Harlingen, and J. Clarke,Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 380 (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. P. Bruines
    • 1
  • V. J. de Waal
    • 1
  • J. E. Mooij
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied PhysicsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations