Skip to main content
Log in

Review paper: The hydrodynamics of helium II film

  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After an introduction to the hydrodynamical properties of He II, a survey is given of the flow properties of superfluid helium in the film. Special attention is given to some unsolved problems, such as: has rotating He II (ω<ω c1 ) a shrunken temperature-dependent parabolic meniscus and is a stationary moving He II film thinner than a static film? A review will be given of the present state of affairs both from an experimental and theoretical point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. R. Atkins,Liquid Helium (Cambridge University Press, London, 1959), Chap. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Wilks,Liquid and Solid Helium (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967), Chap. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. G. Daunt and K. Mendelssohn,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A170, 423, 439 (1939);Nature 157, 839 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Bowers, D. F. Brewer, and K. Mendelssohn,Phil. Mag. 42, 1445 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Bowers,Phil. Mag. 44, 465, 485 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. R. Atkins,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A203, 119 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. C. Jackson and L. G. Grimes,Phil. Mag. Suppl. 7, 435 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. London,Z. Phys. Chemie (B)11, 222 (1930);Z. Physik 63, 245 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. S. Sabisky and C. H. Anderson, Communication at the European Physical Society, Low Temperature Conference, 6–8 April, 1972, Freudenstadt, Germany; Proceedings Thirteenth International Conference on low temperature physics, August 21–25, 1972, Boulder, Colorado;Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 1049 (1970);J. Low Temp. Phys. 3, 235 (1970).

  10. H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder,Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948); H. B. G. Casimir,Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetenschappen B51, 793 (1948); E. M. Lifshitz,Soviet Phys.—JETP 2, 73 (1956); I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii,Soviet Phys.—JETP 10, 161 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. R. Atkins,Phys. Rev. 113, 962 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. W. F. Everitt, K. R. Atkins, and A. Denenstein,Phys. Rev. 136, A1494 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. A. Pickar and K. R. Atkins,Phys. Rev. 178, 389 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Rudnick, R. S. Kagiwada, J. C. Fraser, and E. Guyon,Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 430 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. D. Landau,J. Phys. USSR 5, 71 (1941); I. M. Khalatnikov,An Introduction to the Theory of Superfluidity (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. For an intensive discussion see S. J. Putterman, thesis, Rockefeller University, New York, 1970.

  17. R. E. Little and K. R. Atkins,Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 1224 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. van Spronsen, H. J. Verbeek, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, K. W. Taconis, and H. van Beelen,Physica 61, 129 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. M. Kontorovich,Soviet Phys.—JETP 3, 770 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. E. Keller,Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 569 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. London,Superfluids: Vol. I, Macroscopic Theory of Superconductivity; Vol. II, Liquid Helium (Dover, New York, 1950, 1954); F. London and H. London,Physica 2, 341 (1935);Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A149, 71 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Meissner and R. Ochsenfeld,Naturwiss. 21, 787 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. D. Landau,J. Phys. USSR 5, 71 (1941);Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 11, 592 (1941); see also, I. M. Khalatnikov,An Introduction to the Theory of Superfluidity (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. London,Report on an International Conference on Fundamental Particles and Low Temperatures (The Physical Society, London, 1947), Vol. 2, p. 48; F. London,Superfluids (Dover, New York, 1954), Vol. 2, p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. V. Osborne,Proc. Phys. Soc. (London)A63, 909 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. E. Hall,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A250, 359 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. D. Reppy and C. T. Lane,Phys. Rev. 140A, 106 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Onsager,Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 6, 249 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. P. Feynman,Progress in Low Temperature Physics, C. J. Gorter, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1955), Vol. 1, Chap. 2, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. F. Vinen,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A260, 218 (1961); S. C. Whitmore and W. Zimmermann, Jr.,Phys. Rev. 166, 181 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. W. Rayfield and F. Reif,Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 305 (1963);Phys. Rev. 136A, 1194 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  32. For a clear discussion see S. J. Putterman and G. E. Uhlenbeck,Phys. Fluids 12, 2229 (1969); for a review of the experimental situation until 1966 see E. L. Andronikashvili and Yu. G. Mamaladze,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 567 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. B. Hess and W. M. Fairbank,Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 216 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. E. Packard and J. M. Sanders,Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 823 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. J. Putterman, thesis (Rockefeller University, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. Onsager and O. Penrose,Phys. Rev. 104, 576 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. J. Putterman, private communication, 1969.

  38. C. C. Matheson and D. G. Blair,Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Low Temperature Physics (Keigaku Publ. Corp., Tokyo, 1971), p. 111.

  39. E. R. Huggins,Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 573, 699 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. L. Goodstein and P. G. Saffman,Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 1402 (1970);Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A325, 447 (1971); paper published in the proceedings of the LT 13 conference, Colorado, USA, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. J. Putterman and I. Rudnick,Physics Today (August 1971); S. J. Putterman, to be published in the proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on low temperature physics, Colorado, USA, 1972.

  42. A. A. Sobyanin,Soviet Phys.—JETP 34, 229 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. van Spronsen, H. J. Verbeek, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, H. van Beelen, and K. W. Taconis, preliminary results, will be published inPhysics Letters (1973).

  44. K. R. Atkins,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A203, 119 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  45. V. L. Ginzburg and L. P. Pitaevskii,Soviet Phys.—JETP 7, 858 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  46. K. R. Atkins and Y. Narahara,Phys. Rev. 138, A437 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  47. See for instance: W. M. van Alphen, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, K. W. Taconis and E. van Spronsen,Physica 39, 109 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This review, concerning the superfluid flow properties of the nearly saturated He II film, was given at a conference on low temperature physics at Freudenstadt, Germany, April 6–8, 1972, organized by the European Physical Society.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Bruyn Ouboter, R. Review paper: The hydrodynamics of helium II film. J Low Temp Phys 12, 3–23 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654721

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654721

Keywords

Navigation