Abstract
After an introduction to the hydrodynamical properties of He II, a survey is given of the flow properties of superfluid helium in the film. Special attention is given to some unsolved problems, such as: has rotating He II (ω<ω c1 ) a shrunken temperature-dependent parabolic meniscus and is a stationary moving He II film thinner than a static film? A review will be given of the present state of affairs both from an experimental and theoretical point of view.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. R. Atkins,Liquid Helium (Cambridge University Press, London, 1959), Chap. 7.
J. Wilks,Liquid and Solid Helium (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967), Chap. 14.
J. G. Daunt and K. Mendelssohn,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A170, 423, 439 (1939);Nature 157, 839 (1946).
R. Bowers, D. F. Brewer, and K. Mendelssohn,Phil. Mag. 42, 1445 (1951).
R. Bowers,Phil. Mag. 44, 465, 485 (1953).
K. R. Atkins,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A203, 119 (1950).
L. C. Jackson and L. G. Grimes,Phil. Mag. Suppl. 7, 435 (1958).
F. London,Z. Phys. Chemie (B)11, 222 (1930);Z. Physik 63, 245 (1930).
E. S. Sabisky and C. H. Anderson, Communication at the European Physical Society, Low Temperature Conference, 6–8 April, 1972, Freudenstadt, Germany; Proceedings Thirteenth International Conference on low temperature physics, August 21–25, 1972, Boulder, Colorado;Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 1049 (1970);J. Low Temp. Phys. 3, 235 (1970).
H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder,Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948); H. B. G. Casimir,Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetenschappen B51, 793 (1948); E. M. Lifshitz,Soviet Phys.—JETP 2, 73 (1956); I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii,Soviet Phys.—JETP 10, 161 (1960).
K. R. Atkins,Phys. Rev. 113, 962 (1959).
C. W. F. Everitt, K. R. Atkins, and A. Denenstein,Phys. Rev. 136, A1494 (1964).
K. A. Pickar and K. R. Atkins,Phys. Rev. 178, 389 (1969).
I. Rudnick, R. S. Kagiwada, J. C. Fraser, and E. Guyon,Phys. Rev. Letters 20, 430 (1968).
L. D. Landau,J. Phys. USSR 5, 71 (1941); I. M. Khalatnikov,An Introduction to the Theory of Superfluidity (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1965).
For an intensive discussion see S. J. Putterman, thesis, Rockefeller University, New York, 1970.
R. E. Little and K. R. Atkins,Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 1224 (1967).
E. van Spronsen, H. J. Verbeek, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, K. W. Taconis, and H. van Beelen,Physica 61, 129 (1972).
V. M. Kontorovich,Soviet Phys.—JETP 3, 770 (1956).
W. E. Keller,Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 569 (1970).
F. London,Superfluids: Vol. I, Macroscopic Theory of Superconductivity; Vol. II, Liquid Helium (Dover, New York, 1950, 1954); F. London and H. London,Physica 2, 341 (1935);Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A149, 71 (1935).
W. Meissner and R. Ochsenfeld,Naturwiss. 21, 787 (1933).
L. D. Landau,J. Phys. USSR 5, 71 (1941);Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz. 11, 592 (1941); see also, I. M. Khalatnikov,An Introduction to the Theory of Superfluidity (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1965).
H. London,Report on an International Conference on Fundamental Particles and Low Temperatures (The Physical Society, London, 1947), Vol. 2, p. 48; F. London,Superfluids (Dover, New York, 1954), Vol. 2, p. 144.
D. V. Osborne,Proc. Phys. Soc. (London)A63, 909 (1950).
H. E. Hall,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A250, 359 (1957).
J. D. Reppy and C. T. Lane,Phys. Rev. 140A, 106 (1965).
L. Onsager,Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 6, 249 (1949).
R. P. Feynman,Progress in Low Temperature Physics, C. J. Gorter, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1955), Vol. 1, Chap. 2, p. 17.
W. F. Vinen,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A260, 218 (1961); S. C. Whitmore and W. Zimmermann, Jr.,Phys. Rev. 166, 181 (1968).
G. W. Rayfield and F. Reif,Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 305 (1963);Phys. Rev. 136A, 1194 (1964).
For a clear discussion see S. J. Putterman and G. E. Uhlenbeck,Phys. Fluids 12, 2229 (1969); for a review of the experimental situation until 1966 see E. L. Andronikashvili and Yu. G. Mamaladze,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 567 (1966).
G. B. Hess and W. M. Fairbank,Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 216 (1967).
R. E. Packard and J. M. Sanders,Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 823 (1969).
S. J. Putterman, thesis (Rockefeller University, New York, 1970).
L. Onsager and O. Penrose,Phys. Rev. 104, 576 (1956).
S. J. Putterman, private communication, 1969.
C. C. Matheson and D. G. Blair,Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Low Temperature Physics (Keigaku Publ. Corp., Tokyo, 1971), p. 111.
E. R. Huggins,Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 573, 699 (1970).
D. L. Goodstein and P. G. Saffman,Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 1402 (1970);Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A325, 447 (1971); paper published in the proceedings of the LT 13 conference, Colorado, USA, 1972.
S. J. Putterman and I. Rudnick,Physics Today (August 1971); S. J. Putterman, to be published in the proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on low temperature physics, Colorado, USA, 1972.
A. A. Sobyanin,Soviet Phys.—JETP 34, 229 (1972).
E. van Spronsen, H. J. Verbeek, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, H. van Beelen, and K. W. Taconis, preliminary results, will be published inPhysics Letters (1973).
K. R. Atkins,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A203, 119 (1950).
V. L. Ginzburg and L. P. Pitaevskii,Soviet Phys.—JETP 7, 858 (1958).
K. R. Atkins and Y. Narahara,Phys. Rev. 138, A437 (1965).
See for instance: W. M. van Alphen, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, K. W. Taconis and E. van Spronsen,Physica 39, 109 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This review, concerning the superfluid flow properties of the nearly saturated He II film, was given at a conference on low temperature physics at Freudenstadt, Germany, April 6–8, 1972, organized by the European Physical Society.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Bruyn Ouboter, R. Review paper: The hydrodynamics of helium II film. J Low Temp Phys 12, 3–23 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654721
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654721