Skip to main content
Log in

Solvent effects on acid-base behavior: Five uncharged acids in water-sulfolane solvents

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An electrometric titration method utilizing glass electrodes and silver-silver bromide electrodes in a cell without liquid junction has been applied to a determination of the dissociation constants of five uncharged weak acids (HA) in four mixtures of water and sulfolane (tetramethylene sulfone) at 25°C. The acids studied were monochloroacetic, formic, benzoic, and acetic acids andp-nitrophenol, and the mole fractions (x 2) of sulfolane in the mixed solvents were 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8. All measurements were made at a constant ionic strength of 0.02 mole-kg−1 in a solution containing NaBr at a molality of 0.01 mole-kg−1. The cell was standardized by measurements of HClO4 at molalities from 0.002 to 0.01 mole-kg−1 and, in subsequent measurements, a solution of NaA was titrated with HClO4. To obtain the thermodynamic pK, an activity correction derived from the Debye-Hückel theory was applied. The pK of all five acids was found to vary linearly withx 2 in the range 0 to 0.8. By comparison of data for acetic acid in water-methanol, water-dioxane, and water-sulfolane solvents, it was shown that the results are consistent with the known properties of sulfolane (low acidity, basicity, and solvating power), but the linear variation of pK with solvent composition remains unexplained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. F. Coetzee and R. J. Bertozzi,Anal. Chem. 45, 1064 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. L. Benoit, A. L. Beauchamp, and R. Domain,Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 7, 557 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. H. Morman and G. A. Harlow,Anal. Chem. 39, 1869 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. F. Coetzee and R. J. Bertozzi,Anal. Chem. 43, 961 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Castagnolo and G. Petrella,Electrochim. Acta 19, 855 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. J. Parker,Chem. Rev. 69, 1 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Choux and R. L. Benoit,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91, 6221 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Salomon, inPhysical Chemistry of Organic Solvent Systems, A. K. Covington and T. Dickinson, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1973), Chap. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Salomon,J. Phys. Chem. 79, 2000 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Tommila and I. Belinskij,Suom. Kemistil. B42, 185 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. M. P. Eller and J. A. Caruso,Anal. Lett. 4, 13 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. P. Ang,J. Solution Chem. 1, 369 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. G. Bates, G. L. Siegel, and S. F. Acree,J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 30, 347 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Schindler, R. A. Robinson, and R. G. Bates,J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 72A, 141 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Pawlak and R. G. Bates,J. Solution Chem. 4, 817 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Della Monica, U. Lamanna, and L. Senatore,Inorg. Chim. Acta 2, 363 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. L. Benoit, A. L. Beauchamp, and M. Deneux,J. Phys. Chem. 73, 3268 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. B. Hetzer, R. A. Robinson, and R. G. Bates,J. Phys. Chem. 66, 1423 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Tommila, E. Lindell, M. L. Virtalaine, and R. Laakso,Suom. Kemistil. B42, 95 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. S. Harned and R. W. Ehlers,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 54, 1350;55, 652 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. J. G. Ives and J. H. Pryor,J. Chem. Soc., 2104 (1955).

  22. H. S. Harned and N. D. Embree,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56, 1042 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. G. Travers, K. G. McCurdy, D. Dolman, and L. G. Hepler,J. Solution Chem. 4, 267 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. F. Allen, R. A. Robinson, and V. E. Bower,J. Phys. Chem. 66, 171 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes,Electrolyte Solutions, 2nd rev. ed. (Butterworths, London, 1970), Appendix 12.1, Table 6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Shedlovsky and R. L. Kay,J. Phys. Chem. 60, 151 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. L. Benoit and G. Choux,Can. J. Chem. 46, 3215 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

On leave 1973–1975 from the University of Gdansk, Poland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bates, R.G., Pawlak, Z. Solvent effects on acid-base behavior: Five uncharged acids in water-sulfolane solvents. J Solution Chem 5, 213–222 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654338

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654338

Key words

Navigation