Skip to main content
Log in

Review of electrolytic conductance standards

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurements of aqueous electrolytic conductance are performed routinely in a variety of disciplines and industries. Conductivity is a measure of the ionic content in solution and thus has applications in pharmaceuticals, power plants, rainwater, lake surveys, and oceanography, to name a few. A thorough review of the measurement of and standards for aqueous electrolytic conductance is herein presented. At present, the most precise and accurate standards have been set forth by the International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML), and have been adopted by most other standards organizations. However, the uncertainty assigned to these standards, especially the secondary standards, is somewhat larger than would be expected from the physical aspects of the measurement. Several changes in the units and measurement scales, including temperature, volume, molar mass, resistance, and concentration obfuscate the accuracy of these standards. In addition to the review, research is proposed, using a conductance cell with variable length, to establish new standards for aqueous electrolytic conductance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Kohlrausch and W. A. Nippoldt,Gott. Nach. 415, (1868);Ann. Physik. 138, 280, 370 (1869).

  2. F. Kohlrausch, L. Holborn, and H. Dieselhorst,Wied. Ann. 64, 425 (1898).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. C. Parker and E. W. Parker,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 46, 312 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Critical Table, VI, 230, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1929.

  5. G. Jones and R. C. Josephs,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 50, 1049 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Jones and G. N. Bolinger,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51, 2407 (1929);53, 411 (1931);53, 1207 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Jones and B. C. Bradshaw,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55, 1780 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Jones and M. J. Prendergast,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59, 731 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Standard Solutions Reproducing the Conductivity of Electrolytes, International Recommendation No. 56, OIML, 1st edn., June 1980, (Bureau International De Metrologie Legale, Paris, 1981).

  10. T. Shedlovsky,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 54, 1411 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  11. “The International Practical Temperature Scale for 1968”,Metrologia 5, 35 (1969).

  12. D. T. Goldman and R. J. Bell,NBS Special Publication 330, (National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. W. Bremmer and T. G. Thompson,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59, 2372 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Juhasz and K. N. Marsh,Pure & Appl. Chem. 53, 1844 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Saulnier and J. Barthel,J. Solution Chem. 8, 847 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. N. Marsh,J. Solution Chem. 9, 805 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pure and Appl. Chem. 58, 1677 (1986).

  18. J. E. Lind, Jr., J. J. Zwolenik, and R. M. Fuoss,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 1557 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. B. Owen and H. Zeldes,J. Chem. Phys. 18, 1083 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Shedlovsky, A. S. Brown, and D. A. MacInnes,Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 66, 165 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. C. Benson and A. R. Gordon,J. Chem. Phys. 13, 473 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. E. Gunning and A. R. Gordon,J. Chem. Phys. 10, 126 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. C. C. Li and H. Fang,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 64, 1544 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. W. Bremner, T. G. Thompson, and C. L. Utterback,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 61, 1219 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. W. Davies,J. Chem. Soc. 432, (1937).

  26. V. K. Semenchenko, B. V. Erofeev, and V. V. Serpinskii,J. Gen. Chem. (USSR) 2, 893 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. M. Fuoss and K. L. Hsia,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. 57, 1550 (1966);58, 1818 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y-C. Chiu and R. M. Fuoss,J. Phys. Chem. 72, 4123 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. C. Justice,J. Chim. Phys. 65, 353 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rostock, cited by G. J. Janz and R. P. T. Tompkins,J. Electrochem. Soc. 55C, 124 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Barthel, F. Feuerlein, R. Neueder and R. Wachter,J. Solution Chem. 9, 209 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. S. Chen, Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University (1969).

  33. G. S. Kell,J. Chem. Eng. Data 20, 97 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  34. International Critical Tables, III, 87, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1928.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Y.C., Koch, W.F., Hamer, W.J. et al. Review of electrolytic conductance standards. J Solution Chem 16, 985–997 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00652583

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00652583

Key words

Navigation