Metal Science and Heat Treatment

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 21–26 | Cite as

Effect of fine structure on the strength of nickel alloys

  • S. B. Maslenkov
  • G. V. Éstulin
Strengthening Processes


Particles of the second phase are the essential factor in strengthening resulting from the aging of nickel alloys containing aluminum and titanium. Precipitates of 200–500 A in size are responsible for the maximum strength. Hardness decreases as the result of overaging, which is accompanied by an increase in the dimensions of the particles to 1000 A and larger.

Fragmentation of blocks of the matrix also contributes somewhat to strengthening; the higher the degree of dispersity of the mosaic structure, the greater the effect. To determine the effect of the dimensions of blocks it is apparently necessary to take into account not only the relative change of their dimensions but also the absolute value. If the dimensions of the blocks in nickel alloys containing titanium and aluminum decrease from 1 to 0.2 μ as the result of aging, they increase the yield point only 10%.

One can increase the resistance of nickel alloys to rupture considerably if one obtains a mosaic structure in which the size of the blocks is one to two orders lower than is possible to achieve by ordinary aging. If this could be done the size of the blocks would be of the order of magnitude of the optimum size.


Aluminum Titanium Nickel Yield Point Fine Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    S. B. Maslenkov and G. V. Éstulin, Investigation of Heat Resistant Alloys, Vol. 7 [in Russian]. Izd. AN SSSR, 1961.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. V. Éstulin and S. B. Maslenkov, in Coll: Special Steels and Alloys [in Russian], Metallurgizdat. 1962.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. James, Optical Principles of X-Ray Diffraction [Russian translation], IL, 1950.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Kh. Pivovarov and Ya. S. Umanskii, Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly, Metallurgiya, 1958, No. 4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. A. Porai-Koshits, Practical Course in X-Ray Analysis [in Russian], Izd. Moskovskogo universiteta, 1960.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    X-Rays in the Physical Science of Metals [in Russian], Edited by Yu. A. Bagaryatskii, Metallurgizdat, 1961.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. G. Chemyl FMM, 1959,8, No. 1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Maclean, Grain Boundaries of Metals [Russian translation], Metallurgizdat, 1960.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Petch, J. of the Iron and Steel Institute, 1953, v. 25.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Edwards, H. Jones, and B. Walters, J. of the Iron and Steel Institute, 1939, v. 139.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. N. Zimina and M. V. Pridantsev, in Coll: Special Steels and Alloys [in Russian], Metallurgizdat, 1960.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. B. Maslenkov
    • 1
  • G. V. Éstulin
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Scientific Research Institute of Ferrous MetallurgyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations