Advertisement

Experimental dissociation of cells from hydra

  • Somes Sanyal
  • Sivatosh Mookerjee
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    The cellular configuration of a hydra is dissociated under the pressure of a cover-glass and the different cell types are isolated and observed in hanging drop chamber.

     
  2. 2.

    With the exception of certain cnidoblasts, all the cells are rounded after dissociation of which only the nutritive muscular cells of the endoderm show amoeboid movement.

     
  3. 3.

    Pseudopodium originates as ectoplasmic out-pushing in which endoplasm flows in afterwards. Pseudopodia are thrown from all sides of the cell.

     
  4. 4.

    The details of intra-cellular contents in the different cell-types are described.

     
  5. 5.

    The nature of surface rigidity, attachment and cell shape before and after dissociation have been discussed in relation to the animal form and morphallactic power of hydra.

     

Keywords

Developmental Biology Cell Shape Surface Rigidity Hanging Drop Experimental Dissociation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Annandale, N.: The fauna of British India. Fresh water sponges, hydroids and polyzoa, Part II. London: Francis and Taylor 1911.Google Scholar
  2. Evlakhova, V. F.: Form-building migration of regenerative material in hydra. C. R. Acad. Sci. URSS.53, 369 (1946).Google Scholar
  3. Ganguly, B.: The differentiating capacity of dissociated sponge cells. Wilhelm Roux' Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org.152, 22 (1960).Google Scholar
  4. Holtfreter, J.: Properties and functions of the surface coat in amphibian embryos. J. exp. Zool.93, 251 (1943).Google Scholar
  5. —: Structure, motility and locomotion in isolated amphibian cells. J. Morph.79, 27 (1946).Google Scholar
  6. Hyman, L. H.: The invertebrates, Vol. I. New York: McGraw Hill (1940).Google Scholar
  7. Lehn, H.: Die histo-logischen VorgÄnge bei der Reparation von Hydren aus Aggregaten kleiner Fragmente. Wilhelm Roux' Arch. Entwickl.-Mech. Org.146, 371 (1953).Google Scholar
  8. Meyer, P.: Studien zur Regeneration beiHydra attenuata. öst. zool. Z.2, 343 (1950).Google Scholar
  9. Mookerjee, S.: Experimental dissociation of cells from chick embryos. Nature (Lond.)171, 796 (1953).Google Scholar
  10. Morgan, T. H.: Regeneration. New York: MacMillan 1901.Google Scholar
  11. Moscona, A. C., andH. Moscona: The dissociation and aggregation of cells from organ rudiments of the early chick embryo. J. Anat. (Lond.)86, 287 (1952).Google Scholar
  12. Papenfuss, E.: Reunion of pieces inHydra with special reference to the role of the three layers and to the fate of the differentiated parts. Biol. Bull.67, 223 (1934).Google Scholar
  13. Sanyal, S., and S.Mookerjee: Individuality of the cell-types of hydra. Proc. 44th Ind. Sci. Congr., Part III, p. 300, 1957.Google Scholar
  14. - Morphallactic nature of hydranth regeneration. (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Thompson, D'arcy: Growth and form. Cambridge 1917.Google Scholar
  16. Waddington, C. H.: Observation on the forces of morphogenesis in the amphibian embryo. J. exp. Biol.19, 284 (1942).Google Scholar
  17. Weiss, P.: Cell contact. Int. Rev. Cytol.7, 391 (1958).Google Scholar
  18. —: Interactions between cells. Rev. mod. Physics.31, 449 (1959).Google Scholar
  19. Wilson, H. V.: On the behaviour of the dissociated cells in hydroid,Alcyonaria andAsterias. J. exp. Zool.11, 280 (1911).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • Somes Sanyal
    • 1
  • Sivatosh Mookerjee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyPresidency CollegeCalcuttaIndia

Personalised recommendations