Advertisement

Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 383–397 | Cite as

Optical surface features and morphologic properties of the Orion Nebula

  • Karl Wurm
  • Mario Perinotto
Article

Abstract

In the field partsH, K, L andM of the Orion Nebula, indicated in Figure 2, no obvious differences do appear in the monochromatic photographs obtained in Hα+[Nii], [Oii], the visual continuum and the range of the Balmer continuum. A different situation we meet in the rest of the field, where one observes two types of featuresA andB, distinguished in Figure 1 by solid and dashed bordering lines respectively. Relative to the conditions in the Hα+[Nii] pictures, the typeA areas gain in intensity in the photographs taken in the visual continuum. the emission in the forbidden [Oii] lines at λ 3727 Å is correlated with Hα+[Nii], the emission in the range of the Balmer continuum with the visual continuum. According to these properties theA-areas must have a particularly high percentage of scattered star light.

Most of the areas with identical monochromatic features show a high deficiency of cluster stars correlated with a low surface brightnesss and a reduced gas density. This is explained by an opaqueness of the emission strata in the direction in the line of sight and a position of the same nearer to the observer than the extension of the cluster. There appear surface structures at large distances from the Trapezium which show a correlation between the intensity of scattered star light and the intensity of the emission of the higher ions ([Oiii], [Neiii]). This observation is considered as a proof that ‘canals’ through the nebular cloud complex allow in some directions the exciting radiation to reach large distances from the star without having suffered an appreciable absorption or scattering.

Keywords

Radiation Large Distance Surface Structure Surface Feature Morphologic Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Czyzak, S. J.: 1968, inStars and Stellar Systems 7, 40, Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Menzel, D. H. and M. H. Hebb: 1940,Astrophys. J. 92, 408.Google Scholar
  3. Münch, G. and O. C. Wilson: 1962,Z. Astrophys. 56, 127.Google Scholar
  4. Perinotto, M. and K. Wurm: 1970, IAU Colloquium, Jena 1969, in press.Google Scholar
  5. Seaton, M. J.: 1960,Rept. Prog. Phys. 23, 313.Google Scholar
  6. Weedman, D. W.: 1968,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 80, 314.Google Scholar
  7. Wilson, O. C.: 1939,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pat. 9, 274.Google Scholar
  8. Wilson, O. C.: 1940,Astrophys. J. 91, 360.Google Scholar
  9. Wilson, O. C., G. Münch, E. M. Flather, and M. Coffeen: 1960,Astrophys. J. Suppl. 4, 199.Google Scholar
  10. Wurm, K. and L. Rosino: 1956,Mitt. Hamb. Sternwarte No. 10.Google Scholar
  11. Wurm, K. and L. Rosino: 1959,Monochr. Atlas of the Orion Nebula I, Asiago Obs., Italy.Google Scholar
  12. Wurm, K. and L. Rosino: 1965,Monochr. Atlas of the Orion Nebula II, Asiago Obs., Italy.Google Scholar
  13. Wurm, K.: 1961,Z. Astrophys. 52, 149.Google Scholar
  14. Wurm, K.: 1963,Z. Astrophys. 58, 1.Google Scholar
  15. Wurm, K. and M. Perinotto: 1965,Z. Astrophys. 62, 30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Wurm
    • 1
  • Mario Perinotto
    • 1
  1. 1.Asiago Astrophysical ObservatoryItaly

Personalised recommendations