Advertisement

Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 125, Issue 2, pp 219–242 | Cite as

Photometry and discussion of the classical Algol systems U Sge and U Cep

  • M. A. Khan
  • E. Budding
Article

Abstract

The (in many respects, similar) classical Algol-type eclipsing binary systems U Sge and U Cep are studied and compared against a background of photometric evidence, both broadhand and narrowband. Broadband photometry of the primary minimum of U Sge over a four year period fails clearly to confirm Olson's (1982b) finding of radial variations.

On the other hand, the ‘W’-type pattern of variation indicated in Olson's (1976) Hβ photometry of the primary eclipse of U Cep is also noticed for U Sge. These effects are analysed in terms of an emitting accretion disk, surrounding the primary components. Electron densities in these highly ionized structures are derived to be in the range 1010–1011, for the Hβ emitting region, with that of U Cep being 3 times greater than that of U Sge, though since the volume of the structure is 3 times bigger for U Sge, the overall masses are comparable.

These findings can be placed in a ‘Case B’-type interacting binary context, which shows the studied accretion structures to be relatively tenuous; and, since the mean mass loss rate for U Cep is likely to be high than that of U Sge by more than an order of magnitude, suggests they are not so directly dependent on this mass-loss rate.

Keywords

Mass Loss Binary System Loss Rate Accretion Disk Type Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, C. W.: 1973,Astrophysical Quantities (3rd ed.), Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
  2. Awadalla, N. S. and Budding, E.: 1982, in Z. Kopal and J. Rähe (eds.), ‘Binary and Multiple Stars as Tracers of Stellar Evolution’,IAU Colloq. 69, 239.Google Scholar
  3. Batten, A. H.: 1973,Binary and Multiple Systems of Stars, Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
  4. Batten, A. H.: 1974,Publ. Dominion Astrophys. Obs. Victoria 14, 191.Google Scholar
  5. Batten, A. H.: 1981, in E. B. Carling and Z. Kopal (eds.),Photometric and Spectroscopic Binary Systems, R. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 465.Google Scholar
  6. Batten, A. H., Fisher, W. A., Baldwin, B. W., and Scarfe, C. D.: 1975,Nature 253, 174.Google Scholar
  7. Biermann, P. and Hall, D. S.: 1973,Astron. Astrophys. 27, 249.Google Scholar
  8. Budding, E.: 1980, in M. J. Plavec, D. M. Popper, and R. K. Ulrich (eds.), ‘Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretation’,IAU Symp. 88, 299.Google Scholar
  9. Budding, E.: 1981, in E. B. Carling and Z. Kopal (eds.),Photometric and Spectroscopic Binary Systems, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 473.Google Scholar
  10. Budding, E.: 1984,Bull. Inf. Centre Données Stellaires 27, 91.Google Scholar
  11. Budding, E. and Marngus, N.: 1980,Astrophys. Space Sci. 67, 477.Google Scholar
  12. Budding, E. and Najim, N. N.: 1980,Astrophys. Space Sci. 72, 369.Google Scholar
  13. Byrd, P. F. and Friedman, M. D.: 1971,Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  14. Carpenter, E. F.: 1930,Astrophys. J. 72, 205.Google Scholar
  15. Cester, B. and Pucillo, M.: 1972,Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. 43, 501.Google Scholar
  16. Cox, D. P. and Tucker, W. H.: 1969,Astrophys. J. 157, 1157.Google Scholar
  17. Crawford, D. L.: 1958,Astrophys. J. 128, 190.Google Scholar
  18. Dalgarno, A. and McCray, R. A.: 1972,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 375.Google Scholar
  19. Dobiáŝ, J. J. and Plavec, M. J.: 1985,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 97, 138.Google Scholar
  20. El Bassuny Alway, A.: 1981, M.Sc. Thesis. University of Manchester (unpublished).Google Scholar
  21. Hall, D. S. and Keel, W. C.: 1977,Acta Astron. 27, 167.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, D. L.: 1963, in K. Strand (ed.)Basic Astronomical Data, Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, p. 263.Google Scholar
  23. Kadouri, T. H.: 1982, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester (unpublished).Google Scholar
  24. Kaitchuck, R. H. and Honeycutt, R. K.: 1983,Proceedings of Workshop on Interacting Binary Stars, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, preprint.Google Scholar
  25. Khan, R. M. A.: 1982, private communication.Google Scholar
  26. Khan, R. M. A.: 1984, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester (unpublished).Google Scholar
  27. Kopal, Z.: 1947, Harvard Obs. Circ. No. 450.Google Scholar
  28. Kopal, Z.: 1979,Language of the Stars, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  29. Kopal, Z.: 1981, in E. B. Carling and Z. Kopal (eds.),Photometric and Spectroscopic Binary Systems, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
  30. Kreiner, J. M. and Ziołkowski, J.: 1978,Acta Astron. 28, 497.Google Scholar
  31. Kukarkin, B. V., Khopolov, P. N., Efremev, Y. N., Kukarkina, N. P., Kurochkin, N. E., Medvedeva, G. I., Perova, N. B., Fedorovich, V. P., and Frolov, M. S.: 1969,General Catalogue of Variable Stars, Vol. I, 3rd ed. + Vol. II 1970, Moscow.Google Scholar
  32. Lubow, S. H. and Shu, F. H.: 1975,Astrophys. J. 198, 383.Google Scholar
  33. Marngus, N.: 1979, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manchester (unpublished).Google Scholar
  34. McNamara, D. H.: 1951,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 63, 38.Google Scholar
  35. McNamara, D. H. and Feltz, K. A. Jr.: 1976,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 88, 688.Google Scholar
  36. Naftilan, S. A.:Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 7, 476.Google Scholar
  37. Olson, E. C.: 1976,Astrophys. J. 204, 141.Google Scholar
  38. Olson, E. C.: 1978,Astrophys. J. 220, 251.Google Scholar
  39. Olson, E. C.: 1980a,Astrophys. J. 237, 496.Google Scholar
  40. Olson, E. C.: 1980b,Astrophys. J. 241, 257.Google Scholar
  41. Olson, E. C.: 1982a,Astrophys. J. 259, 702.Google Scholar
  42. Olson, E. C.: 1982b,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 94, 70.Google Scholar
  43. Olson, E. C.: 1984,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 96, 576.Google Scholar
  44. Olson, E. C.: 1983,Proceedings of Workshop on Interacting Binary Stars, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (to appear).Google Scholar
  45. Parthasarathy, M., Lambert, D. L., and Tomkin, J.: 1979,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 186 391.Google Scholar
  46. Parthasarathy, M., Lambert, D. L., and Tomkin, J.: 1983,Montly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 203, 1063.Google Scholar
  47. Peters, G. J. and Polidan, R. S.: 1984,Astrophys. J. 283, 745.Google Scholar
  48. Plavec, M.: 1968,Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 19, 11.Google Scholar
  49. Plavec, M.: 1980, in M. J. Plavec, D. M. Popper, and R. K. Ulrich (eds.), ‘Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretation’,IAU Symp. 88, 299.Google Scholar
  50. Plavec, M.: 1983,Astrophys. J. 275, 251.Google Scholar
  51. Popper, D. M.: 1980,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 18, 137.Google Scholar
  52. Prendergast, K. H. and Taam, R. E.: 1974,Astrophys. J. 189, 125.Google Scholar
  53. Raymond, J. C., Cox, D. P., and Barham, W. S.: 1976,Astrophys. J. 204, 290.Google Scholar
  54. Redman, R. O.: 1936,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 96, 488.Google Scholar
  55. Sahade, J. and Wood, F. B.: 1978,Interacting Binary Stars, Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
  56. Struve, O.: 1949,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 109, 487.Google Scholar
  57. Tomkin, J.: 1979,Astrophys. J. 231, 495.Google Scholar
  58. Tomkin, J.: 1981,Astrophys. J. 244, 546.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Khan
    • 1
  • E. Budding
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AstronomyUniversity of ManchesterEngland

Personalised recommendations