Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mutual diffusion coefficients, electrical conductances, osmotic coefficients, and ionic transport coefficientsl ij for aqueous CuSO4 at 25°C

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental thermodynamic and transport data are presented for aqueous CuSO4 solution at 25°C from low concentrations to near saturation. Included are diffusion coefficients (Rayleigh interferometry), electrical conductances (DC method), and osmotic coefficients (isopiestic). These data and corresponding literature data are critically compared, as are literature density data. The resulting best values, together with previously compared transference number results, provide an extensive set of critically reviewed data for aqueous CuSO4. Onsager coefficientsl ij have been calculated for this salt and are compared with data for other valence types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. G. Miller.J. Phys. Chem. 64, 1598 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. G. Miller,J. Phys. Chem. 70, 2639 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. G. Miller,J. Phys. Chem. 71, 616 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. G. Miller,Faraday Disc. Chem. Soc. 64, 295 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Haase and J. Richter,Z. Naturforsch. Teil A 22, 1761 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. S. Dunsmore, S. K. Jalota, and R. Paterson,J. Chem. Soc. A. 1061 (1969).

  7. N. Roessler and H. Schneider,Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 74, 1225 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. K. Jalota and R. Paterson,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 69, 1510 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. G. Miller and M. J. Pikal,J. Solution Chem. 1, 111 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. J. McQuillan,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 70, 1558 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. J. Pikal,J. Phys. Chem. 75, 3124 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. J. Pikal and D. G. Miller,J. Chem. Eng. Data 16, 226 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. J. Murphy and J. K. Taylor,Anal. Chem. 37, 929 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. D. Pinching and R. G. Bates,J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 37, 311 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. G. Albright and D. G. Miller,J. Solution Chem. 4, 809 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. G. Albright and D. G. Miller,J. Phys. Chem. 76, 1853 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. M. Creeth,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 6428 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. G. Albright and D. G. Miller,J. Phys. Chem. 79, 2061 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. G. Miller and J. G. Albright, in preparation.

  20. H. E. Gunning and A. R. Gordon,J. Phys. Chem. 10, 126 (1942)

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Elias and H. I. Schiff,J. Phys. Chem. 60, 595 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Jones and B. C. Bradshaw,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55, 1780 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes,J. Phys. Chem. 65, 1954 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. N. Pearce and G. G. Pumplin,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59, 1221 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. D. Holler and E. L. Peffer,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38, 1021 (1916).

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. D. Harkins and H. M. Paine,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 41, 1155 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

  27. International Critical Tables, Vol. III (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1928), p. 67.

  28. S. Palitzsch,Z. Phys. Chem. Abt. A. 138, 379 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes,Electrolyte Solutions, 2nd edn, revised, (Butterworths, London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Emanuel and D. R. Olander,J. Chem. Eng. Data 8, 31 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. A. Woolf and A. W. Hoveling,J. Phys. Chem. 74, 2406 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. O'Brien, D. Quon, and C. R. Darsi,J. Electrochem. Soc. 117, 888 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Y. Awakura, A. Ebata, M. Morita, and Y. Kondo,Denki Kagaku 43, 569 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  34. W. G. Eversole, H. M. Kindsvater, and J. D. Peterson,J. Phys. Chem. 46, 370 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. R. Vinograd and J. W. McBain,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 63, 2008 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. Tanaka, T. Hashitani, and R. Tamamushi,Rikagaka Kentyusho Hokoku 51, 153 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. A. Rard and D. G. Miller,J. Solution Chem. 10, 755 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. M. Goodwin and W. G. Horsch,Chem. Met. Eng. 21, 181 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Hallstrom,Soc. Sci. Fenn., Commun. Phys. Math. 1(20), 1 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  40. E. F. Kern and M. Y. Chang,Trans. Am. Electrochem. Soc. 41, 181 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. Skowronski and E. A. Reinoso,Trans. Am. Electrochem. Soc. 52, 205 (1927); p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. B. Owen and R. W. Gurry,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 3074 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  43. B. Fedoroff,Ann. Chim. Phys. Ser. 11 16, 154 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. Demichowicz-Pigoniowa,Rocz. Chem. 47, 2183 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. S. Harned and B. B. Owen,The Physical Chemistry of Electrolytic Solutions, 3rd edn. (Reinhold, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  46. T. Shedlovsky, A. S. Brown, and D. A. MacInnes,Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 66, 165 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. F. Chambers, J. M. Stokes, and R. H. Stokes,J. Phys. Chem. 60, 985 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  48. D. G. Miller and F. McMurphy, unpublished. The experiments are described in the Appendix of ref. 12.

  49. J. J. Fritz and C. R. Fuget,J. Phys. Chem. 62, 303 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  50. J. E. Ricci and J. Fischer,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 1443 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  51. C. J. Downes and K. S. Pitzer,J. Solution Chem. 5, 389 (1976); C. J. Downes, private communication, January 13, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  52. P. G. M. Brown and J. E. Prue,Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 232, 320 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  53. E. Lange, J. Monheim, and A. L. Robinson,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55, 4733 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. F. Kapustinskii, B. M. Yakushevskii, and S. I. Drakin.Zh. Fiz. Khim. 27, 588 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  55. R. A. Robinson and R. S. Jones,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 959 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  56. M. H. Lietzke and R. W. Stoughton,J. Phys. Chem. 66, 508 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  57. K. S. Pitzer,J. Phys. Chem. 77, 268 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  58. K. S. Pitzer and G. Mayorga,J. Phys. Chem. 77, 2300 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  59. K. S. Pitzer and G. Mayorga,J. Solution Chem. 3, 539 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  60. K. S. Pitzer and J. J. Kim,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 5701 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  61. K. S. Pitzer,J. Solution Chem. 4, 249 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  62. K. S. Pitzer,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 68, 101 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  63. H. L. Friedman,Ionic Solution Theory, Interscience, New York 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  64. J. C. Rasaiah,J. Solution Chem. 2, 301 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  65. F. E. Wetmore and A. R. Gordon,J. Chem. Phys. 5, 60 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  66. F. Müller and H. Reuther,Z. Elektrochem. 47, 640 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  67. R. F. Nielsen and D. J. Brown,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 49, 2423 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  68. M. Quintin,J. Chim. Phys. 30, 319 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  69. A. Lebettre,J. Chim. Phys. 31, 348 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  70. C. G. Herrara, F. Tallada, and L. Bru,Anales. Fis. Quim. (Madrid) 40, 297 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  71. F. H. Getman,J. Phys. Chem. 34, 1454 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  72. F. Müller and H. Reuther,Z. Elektrochem. 48, 682 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lee B. Eppstein

    Present address: Photovolt Corp., 1115 Broadway, 10010, New York, New York

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, 94550, Livermore, California

    Donald G. Miller & Joseph A. Rard

  2. Chemistry Department, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, 94550, Livermore, California

    Donald G. Miller

  3. Sea Water Conversion Laboratory, University of California, Richmond, California

    Lee B. Eppstein

  4. Chemistry Department, University of Florida, 32611, Gainesville, Florida

    R. A. Robinson

Authors
  1. Donald G. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph A. Rard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lee B. Eppstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. A. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, D.G., Rard, J.A., Eppstein, L.B. et al. Mutual diffusion coefficients, electrical conductances, osmotic coefficients, and ionic transport coefficientsl ij for aqueous CuSO4 at 25°C. J Solution Chem 9, 467–496 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00647737

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00647737

Key Words

Search

Navigation