References
Evans, Gareth, 1981, ‘Understanding Demonstratives,’ in Bouveresse, J. & Parret, H. (eds.),Meaning and Understanding, Berlin: W. de Gruyter, reprinted in Evans, G.: 1985,Collected Papers, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 291–321.
Perry, John, 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives,’The Philosophical Review, Vol. LXXXVI, No. 4, pp. 474–97.
Perry, John, 1979, ‘The Problem of The Essential Indexical,’Noûs, Vol. XIII, No. 1, pp. 3–21.
Perry, John, 1980, ‘A Problem About Continued Belief,’Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. LXI, No. 4, pp. 317–332.
Perry, John, 1986, ‘Thought without Representation,’Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. LX, pp. 137–151.
Perry, John, 1988, ‘Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference,’Noûs, Vol. XXII, No. 1, pp. 1–18.
Perry, John, 1990, ‘Individuals in Informational and Intentional Content’, in Villanueva, Enrique (ed.),Information, Semantics and Epistemology, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 172–189.
Kaplan, David, 1977, ‘Demonstratives’, UCLA, now in Almog, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. (eds.),Themes from Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 481–663.
Wettstein, Howard, 1986, ‘Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?,’The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LXXXIII, No. 4, pp. 185–209.
Wettstein, Howard, 1989, ‘Cognitive Significance Without Cognitive Content,’ in Almog, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. (eds.),Themes from Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 421–454.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We would like to thank Ed Mares, John Perry, Howard Wettstein and an anonymous referee of this journal for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corazza, E., Dokic, J. On the cognitive significance of indexicals. Philos Stud 66, 183–196 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646271
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00646271