Advertisement

Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 238, Issue 1, pp 59–62 | Cite as

Similarities and differences between the [WC 2] nucleus of NGC 5189 and the WO star Sand 4

  • Vito Francesco Polcaro
  • Corinne Rossi
  • Roberto Viotti
  • Laura Norci
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Long slit spectra of the planetary nebula NGC 5189 with its [WC2] type central object and the G2.4+1.4 wind bubble around the evolved Pop. I WO star Sand 4 were obtained in order to investigate the observable effects of different initial masses in stars with otherwise similar spectra. Our preliminary results of a comparative spectroscopic study of these two objects shows that the chemical composition of the two nebuale is completely different, even though their morphology is most probably quite similar. In addition, the PN appears much more chemically homogeneous. These features are clearly associated with the evolutionary paths of the stars.

Keywords

Spectroscopic Study Initial Mass Observable Effect Evolutionary Path Central Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow M.J., Blades J.C., Hummer D.C.:1980,ApJ 241,L27Google Scholar
  2. Barlow M.J., Hummer D.C. 1982,Wolf-Rayet Stars: Observation, Physics, Evolution,de Loore C.W.H. & Willis A.J. (eds.) Proc. IAU Symp. 99, Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 387Google Scholar
  3. Blanco V., Kunzel W., Hiltner W.A. et al., 1968,ApJ 152, L135Google Scholar
  4. Davidson K., Kimmer XX. 1982,PASP 94, 634.Google Scholar
  5. Kingsburg R.L., Barlow M.J., Storey P.J. 1995,A&A 295, 75Google Scholar
  6. Kingsburg R.L., Barlow, M.J. 1995,A&A 295, 171Google Scholar
  7. Langer N., Hamann W.-R., Lennon M., Najarro F., Pauldrach A.W.A., Puls J. 1994,A&A 290, 819Google Scholar
  8. Méndez R.H., 1991, IAU Symp. 145Evolution of stars, G. Michaud and A. Tutukov (eds.), Kluwer, p. 375Google Scholar
  9. Méndez R.H. and Niemela V 1982,Wolf-Rayet Stars: Observation, Physics, Evolution, de Loore C.W.H. & Willis A.J. (eds.) Proc. IAU Symp 99, p. 457Google Scholar
  10. Perinotto M., Purgathofer A., Pasquali A., Patriarchi P. 1994,A&A Suppl. Ser. 107, 481Google Scholar
  11. Polcaro V.F., Rossi C., Norci L., Giovannelli F., Manchanda R. K. 1991,A&A 252, 590Google Scholar
  12. Polcaro V.F., Viotti R., Rossi C., Norci L. 1992,A&A 265, 563 (Paper I)Google Scholar
  13. Polcaro V.F., Viotti R., Rossi C., Norci L. 1995,A&A 303, 211 (Paper II)Google Scholar
  14. Sanduleak N. 1971,ApJ 164, L71Google Scholar
  15. Smith L.F. and Aller L.H. 1969,ApJ 157, 1245Google Scholar
  16. Smith L. F., Shara M.M., Moffat A.F.J. 1990,ApJ 348, 471Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vito Francesco Polcaro
    • 1
  • Corinne Rossi
    • 2
  • Roberto Viotti
    • 1
  • Laura Norci
    • 3
  1. 1.Istituto di Astrofisica SpazialeCNRFrascati RMItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Astronomico dell'Università di Roma “La Sapienza”RomaItaly
  3. 3.Dunsink ObservatoryDublin Institute for Advanced StudiesDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations