Marine Biology

, Volume 99, Issue 1, pp 57–61 | Cite as

Hood construction as a spacing mechanism inCleistostoma kuwaitense (Crustacea: Ocypodidae)

  • D. A. Clayton


The ocypodid crabCleistostoma kuwaitense inhabits the upper shores of the mudflats of Kuwait, where it constructs a semi-permanent mud hood over the entrance to its burrow. Between September and November 1986, data were collected on the distribution and orientation of the hoods and their openings to investigate the crab's social spacing system. Irrespective of density, the distribution of burrow hoods is non-random, tending towards a regular dispersion. A contributory factor for this dispersion pattern is that the surface hoods tend to increase the distance between adjacent burrows. The hood openings are randomly distributed with respect to compass direction but avoid directly facing those of nearest neighbours. In the absence of burrow plugging and eviction as used by other ocypodid crabs, construction of elongated hoods appears to be a good alternative for ensuring social spacing.


Contributory Factor Good Alternative Kuwait Social Spacing Spacing System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Christy, H. J. (1982). Burrow structure and use in the sand fiddler crab,Uca pugilator (Bosc). Anim. Behav. 30: 687–698Google Scholar
  2. Clark, P. J., Evans, F. C. (1954). Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445–453Google Scholar
  3. Clayton, D. A. (1987). Why mudskippers build walls. Behaviour: 102: 185–195Google Scholar
  4. Clayton, D. A., Vaughan, T. C. (1986). Territorial acquisition in the mudskipperBoleophthalmus boddarti (Pisces: Gobiidae). Jour. Zool., Lond. (A) 209: 509–519Google Scholar
  5. Crane, J. (1975). Fiddler crabs of the world. Ocypodidae: genusUca. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans, S. M., Cram, A., Eaton, K., Torrance, R., Wood, V. (1976). Foraging and agonistic behaviour in the ghost crabOcypode kuhlii de Haan. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 4: 121–135Google Scholar
  7. Frith, D. W., Brunenmeister, S. (1980). Ecological and population studies of fiddler crabs (Ocypodidae, GenusUca) on a mangrove shore at Phuket Island, Western Thailand. Crustaceana 39: 157–184Google Scholar
  8. Hagen, H. O., Von (1968). Studien en peruanischen winkerkrabben (Uca). Zool. Jb. Syst. 95: 395–468Google Scholar
  9. Herrnkind, W. F. (1983). Movement patterns and orientation. In: Vernberg, F. J., Vernberg, F. J. (eds.) The biology of crustacea. Volume 7, Behavior and Ecology, Academic Press, New York p. 41–106Google Scholar
  10. Hill, G. W. (1982). Orientation of ghost crab,Ocypode quadrata, burrows as an indicator of shoreline position and wind direction. Texas J. Sci. 34: 23–34Google Scholar
  11. Hughes, D. A. (1973). On mating and the “copulation burrows” of crabs of the genusOcypode (Decopoda, Brachura). Crusteaceana 24: 72–76Google Scholar
  12. Jones, D. A. (1972). Aspects of the ecology and behaviour ofOcypode ceratophthalmus (Pallas) andO. kuhlii de Haan (Crustacea: Ocypodidae). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 8: 31–43Google Scholar
  13. Jones, D. A., Clayton, D. A. (1983). The systematics and ecology of crabs belonging to the generaCleistostoma De Haan andParacleistostoma De Man on Kuwait mudflats. Crustaceana 45: 183–199Google Scholar
  14. Lighter, F. J. (1974). A note on a behavioural spacing mechanism of the ghost crabOcypode ceratophthalmus (Pallas) (Decapoda, Family Ocypodidae). Crustaceana 27: 312–314Google Scholar
  15. Linsenmair, E. K. (1967). Konstruktion und Signalfunktion der Sandpyramide der ReiterkrabbeOcypode saratan (Decapoda Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 24: 403–456Google Scholar
  16. Matthews, L. H. (1930). Notes on the fiddler crab,Uca leptodactyla Rathbun. Ann. Mag. Natur. Hist. Series. 10, 5: 659–663Google Scholar
  17. Pielou, E. C. (1977). Mathmatical Ecology. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Powers, L. W., Bliss, D. E. (1983). Terrestial adaptions. In: Vernberg, L. W., Vernberg, W. B. (eds.) The Biology of crustacea. Volume 8, Environmental adaptations. Academic Press, New York, p. 271–334Google Scholar
  19. Salmon, M. (1987). On the reproductive behaviour of the fiddler crab,Uca thayeri, with comparisons toU. pugilator andU. vocans: evidence for behavioural convergence. Journ. crust. Biol. 7: 25–44Google Scholar
  20. Siegel, S. (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral Sciences. McGraw Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Vandermeer, J. (1981). Elementary mathematical ecology. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Wada, K. (1984). Barricade building inIlyoplax pusillus (De Haan) (Crustacea: Brachyura). J exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 83: 73–88Google Scholar
  23. Wada, K. (1987). Neighhor burrow-plugging inIlyoplax pusillus (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Mar. Biol. 95: 299–303Google Scholar
  24. Zucker, N. (1974). Shelter building as a means of reducing territory size in the fiddler crab,Uca terpsichores (Crustacea: Ocypodidae). Amer. Midl. Nat. 91: 224–236Google Scholar
  25. Zucker, N. (1977). Neighbor dislodgement and burrow-filling activities by maleUca musica terpsichores. A spacing mechanism. Mar. Biol. 41: 281–286Google Scholar
  26. Zucker, N. (1981). The role of hood-building in defining territories and limiting combat in fiddler crabs. Anim. Behav. 29: 387–395Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Clayton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyKuwait UniversitySafatKuwait

Personalised recommendations