Skip to main content
Log in

A modified Weibull treatment for the analysis of strength-test data from non-identical brittle specimens

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Powder compacts (e.g., pharmaceutical tablets) manufactured on commerically available machines are not strictly identical but show inevitable variability in their weights, thicknesses and compaction pressures. Consequently, the variability in fracture-stress data obtained from such brittle specimens is greater than that due to the inherent strength variability of the material itself. A modified Weibull analysis has been developed so that a more accurate estimate of the inherent variability of the mechanical strength of the material can be derived from test data obtained from commercially produced compacts; its application is illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D :

diameter

f(ρυ) :

relative frequency of occurrence of specimens with densityρ and volumeυ

F :

minimization function

i :

ascending rank number of a fracture stress

m :

Weibull modulus

N tot :

number of specimens in a batch

N(ρυ) :

number of specimens with densities in the rangeρ toρ + dρ and volumes in the rangeυ toυ + dυ

P f :

failure probability

p u :

upper punch compaction pressure

t :

thickness

υ :

volume

w :

weight

W f :

fracture load

ρ :

density

σ f :

fracture stress

¯σ f :

mean fracture stress of a batch

¯σ f(ρυ):

mean fracture stress of specimens with densityρ and volumeυ

σ 0 :

scale parameter or normalizing factor

σ u :

location parameter or threshold stress

References

  1. A. M. Freudenthal, “Fracture”, Vol. II, edited by H. Liebowitz (Academic Press, New York and London, 1968) pp. 591–619.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Griffith,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 221 (1920) 163.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Weibull,Ingenioersvetenskapsakad. Handl. 151 (1939) 45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. L. L. Carneiro andA. Barcellos,R.I.L.E.M. Bull. 13 (1953) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Stanley andJ. M. Newton,J. Powder Bulk Solids Tech. 1 (1978) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. W. Kennerley, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham (1980).

  7. J. W. Kennerley, J. M. Newton andP. Stanley,Acta Pharm. Tech. 7 Suppl. (1979) 53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Stanley, H. Fessler andA. D. Sivill,Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 22 (1973) 453.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Abramowitz andI. A. Stegun, “Handbook of Mathematical Functions, with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables” (N.B.S., Washington, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Y. Robinson, “Some Problems in the Estimation and Application of Weibull Statistics” (University of California, UCRL-70555, 1967).

  11. A. D. Sivill, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham (1974).

  12. D. G. S. Davies,Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 22 (1973) 429.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. W. Kennerley, J. M. Newton andP. Stanley,J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 31 Suppl. (1979) 77P.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennerley, J.W., Newton, J.M. & Stanley, P. A modified Weibull treatment for the analysis of strength-test data from non-identical brittle specimens. J Mater Sci 17, 2947–2954 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00644674

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00644674

Keywords

Navigation