Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study on the two classes of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles separated in metrizamide density gradient, by electrophoresis of proteins and chase experiments. Evidence for two distinct subfractions of HnRNP in mammalian nuclei

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (HnRNP) were separated in metrizamide density gradients, into two fractions migrating to 1.31 g ml-1 and 1.18 g ml-1, respectively. Proteins associated with each of these fractions were analysed by SDS-acrylamide gel electrophoresis. It is shown that the whole proteins extracted from these two metrizamide fractions exhibit clearly different electrophoretic patterns: 1.31 HnRNP particles contain as major polypeptide chains molecules with molecular weights ranging from 40 000 to 65 000, while major polypeptides of 1.18 HnRNP are banding in the 30 000–40 000 molecular weight region of the gels. Both fractions contain numerous other associated polypeptide chains whose molecular weights are above 65 000. A possible kinetic relationship between these two HnRNP classes was investigatedin vivo by performing chase experiments. No clear evidence for a precursor-product relationship was found. Implications arising from these structural and kinetic observations, and problems relating to nuclear maturation of pre-messenger RNA, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris, H.,Biochem. J. 84, 60 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Houssais, J. F. and Attardi, G.,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 56, 616 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soeiro, R., Birboim, H. and Darnell, J. E.,J. Mol. Biol. 19, 362 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scherrer, K., Marcaud, L., Zajdela, F., London, I. M., and Gros, F.,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 56, 1571 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Spohr, G., Imaizumi, T., and Scherrer, K.,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 5009 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Imaizumi, T., Diggelman, H., and Scherrer, K.,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 1122 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williamson, R., Drewienkiewicz, C. E., and Paul, J.,Nature New Biol. 241, 66 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ruiz-Carillo, A., Beato, M., Schutz, G., Feigelson, P., and Allfrey, V. G.,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 3641 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Macnaughton, M., Freeman, K. B., and Bishop, J. O.,Cell 1, 117 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Price, R. P., Ransom, L., and Penman, S.,Cell 2, 253 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spohr, G., Dettori, G., and Manzari, V.,Cell 8, 505 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hendrick, D. and De Kloet, S. R.,Mol. Biol. Reports 2, 225 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Samarina, O. P., Lukanidin, E. M., Molnar, J., and Georgiev, G. P.,J. Mol. Biol. 33, 251 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stevenin, J., Mandel, P., and Jacob, M.,Bull. Soc. Chim. Biol. 52, 703 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Niessing, J. and Sekeris, C. E.,Biochim. Biophys. Acta 247, 391 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Faiferman, I., Hamilton, M. G., and Pogo, A. O.,Biochim. Biophys. Acta 232, 685 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sommerville, J. and Hill, R. J.,Nature New Biol. 245, 104 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Albrecht, C. and Van Zyl, I. M.,Exp. Cell Res. 76, 8 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pederson, T.,J. Mol. Biol. 83, 163 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ducamp, C. and Jeanteur, P.,Biochimie 55, 1235 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Faiferman, I. and Pogo, A. O.,Biochemistry 14, 3808 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar, A. and Pederson, T.,J. Mol. Biol. 96, 353 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Houssais, J. F.,FEBS Letters 56, 341 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Houssais, J. F., inBiological Separation in Iodinated Density Gradient Media, D. Rickwood (ed.), Information Retrieval Limited, London and Washington, D.C., (1976) p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matringe, H. and Jacob, M.,Biochimie 54, 1169 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krichevskaya, A. A. and Georgiev, G. P.,Biochim. Biophys. Acta 194, 619 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Martin, T., Billings, P., Levey, A., Ozarslan, S., Quinlan, T., Swift, H., and Urbas, L.,Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 38, 921 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osborne-Rivet, L. and Houssais, J.F.,Eur. J. Biochem. 48, 427 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Houssais, J. F.Eur. J. Biochem. 24, 232 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Laemmli, U.K.,Nature 227, 680 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gallinaro-Matringe, H., Stevenin, J., and Jacob, M.,Biochemistry 14, 2547 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stevenin, J., Gallinaro-Matringe, H., Gattoni, R., and Jacob, M.,J. Mol. Biol., in press.

  33. Ross, J.,J. Mol. Biol. 106, 403 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kinniburgh, A. J. and Martin, T. E.,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 2725 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houssais, JF. A comparative study on the two classes of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles separated in metrizamide density gradient, by electrophoresis of proteins and chase experiments. Evidence for two distinct subfractions of HnRNP in mammalian nuclei. Mol Biol Rep 3, 251–261 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00643481

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00643481

Keywords

Navigation