Abstract
We present a Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey (SWED-QUAL) that was adapted from measures used in the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS). The development of these measures spans more than 20 years and their reliability and validity have been extensively tested. The SWED-QUAL consists of 61 items that form 11 multi-item scales tapping aspects of physical, mental, social and general health. The instrument was mailed in 1991 to a random stratified sample of 2,366 individuals from the Swedish general population aged 18–84 years and to a stratified random sample of 2,349 individuals who had been seriously injured in a traffic accident. The response rates were 61% and 59%, respectively. Telephone follow-up of non-responders indicate that most of those tended to have a better health-related quality of life than responders. The SWED-QUAL satisfied all of the psychometric criteria that were evaluated. Multitrait scaling provided strong support for item discrimination. Cronbach's alpha exceeded 0.78 for all scales. Scores tended to be lower among older than younger people, and among females compared to males. The good response rate indicates that the content of the SWED-QUAL is considered relevant by people at large, that the results from the general population sample could be used for comparisons with other samples and the instrument used for further studies of the effectiveness of a broad spectrum of medical interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
HaysRD, ShapiroMF. An overview of generic health-related quality of life measures for HIV research.Qual Life Res 1992;1: 91–97
StewartAL, SherbourneCD, HaysRD, et al. Summary and discussion of MOS measures. In: StewartAL, WareJE, eds.Measuring Functioning and Well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992: 345–371.
WareJE, SherbourneCD. A 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.Med Care 1992;30: 473–483.
StewartAL, HaysRD, WareJE. The MOS short-form general health survey: Reliability and validity in a patient population.Med Care 1988;26: 724–735.
OrleyJ. WHO meeting on quality of life: Development of the WHO QOL instrument.Quality Life News 1992;4: 4.
WareJE. Standards for validating health measures: Definition and content.J Chronic Dis 1987;40: 473–480.
World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. In:Basic Documents. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1948
BergnerM. Measurement of health status.Med Care 1985;23: 696–704.
BreslowL. A quantitative approach to the World Health Organization definition of health: physical, mental and social well-being.Int J Epidemiol 1972;1: 347–355.
WareJE. Methodological considerations in the selection of health status assessment procedures. In: WengerNK, MattsonME, FurbergCD, et al., eds.Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. New York: Le Jacq Publishing, 1984: 87–111.
HaysRD, HayashiT. Beyond internal consistency reliability: Rationale and user's guide for multitrait scaling analysis program on the microcomputer.Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1990;22: 167–175.
CronbachLJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika 1951;16: 297–334.
NunnallyJ.Psychometric Theory. 2nd edn. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1978.
NelsonE, HaysRD, ArnoldS, KwohK, SherbourneS.Age and Functional Health Status. Report P-7570, June 1989. Santa Monica, The RAND Corporation: 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this paper has been supported in part by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council, the Swedish Road Safety Office and the World Health Organization (Regional Office for Europe).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brorsson, B., Ifver, J. & Hays, R.D. The Swedish Health-Related Quality of Life Survey (SWED-QUAL). Qual Life Res 2, 33–45 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642887
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642887