Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 393–395 | Cite as

The yield of flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in the detection of asymptomatic colorectal neoplasia

  • D. C. Wherry
  • W. M. Thomas
Original Articles

Abstract

Recent evidence of a reduction in mortality rates from distal colorectal cancers in populations screened by rigid sigmoidoscopy suggests that further benefits may be achieved by the use of fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy as the screening modality. However, there is limited evidence as to the expected yield of neoplasia using the standard 60-cm instrument. The aim of this study was to determine the yield of neoplasia in an asymptomatic population in the at-risk age group undergoing fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy.

Recruitment into the screening program was among State Department personnel. In total, 4,216 asymptomatic subjects (50–65 years) were offered flexible sigmoidoscopic screening performed following a simple enema bowel preparation. Those in whom a neoplastic condition was identified underwent further investigation (colonoscopy or barium enema).

Of those offered screening 4,005 (95%) underwent the examination. Eleven carcinomas were detected at flexible sigmoidoscopy and two carcinomas were detected at further investigation in subjects with rectosigmoid polyps. The overall detection rate of carcinomas was 3.2 per 1,000 subjects screened.

Histologically proven adenomas were detected in 217 subjects, 5.4% of the population screened.

In this cohort of individuals flexible sigmoidoscopy appears to have been an acceptable form of screening.

The detection rate of neoplasia, particularly colorectal adenomas, is higher than that reported from studies of fecal occult blood screening.

Key words

Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy Screening for colorectal cancer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alquist DA, Wieand HS, Moertel CG (1993) Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. A prospective study using Hemoccult and HemoQuant tests. JAMA 296: 1262–1267Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American College of Physicians, Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project (1990) Screening for colorectal cancer. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326: 658–662Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilbertson VA, Nelms JM (1978) The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum. Cancer 41: 1137–1139Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hardcastle JD, Thomas WM, Chamberlain J (1989) Randomised, controlled trial of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: results for first 107,349 subjects. Lancet i: 1160–1164Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hertz REL, Deddish MR, Day E (1960) Value of periodic examination in detecting cancer of the rectum and colon. Postgrad Med 27: 290–294Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J (1989) Repeated screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. A prospective randomized study at Funen, Denmark. Scand J Gastroenterol 24: 599–606Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller AB (1987) Review of sigmoidoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. In: Chamberlain J, Miller AB (eds) Screening for gastrointestinal cancer. Hans Huber, Toronto, pp 3–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Cancer Institute (1987) Working guidelines for early cancer detection: rationale and supporting evidence to decrease mortality. Bethesda MDGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newcombe PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, et al (1992) Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 1572–1575Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Selby JV, Freidman GD, Quesenberry CP, Weiss NS (1992) A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 326: 653–657Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wherry DC (1981) Screening for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic patients using flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy. Dis Col Rect 24: 521–525Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. C. Wherry
    • 1
  • W. M. Thomas
    • 2
  1. 1.Medical Division of the United States Department of State and Uniformed Services University of The Health SciencesBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity HospitalNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations