Abstract
Some recent astronomical observations [4], and a number of experiments in particle physics, seem to cast doubt on the validity of the standard linear model for time. These results raise two (at least) questions: (1) If time is not a linear continuum (i.e., if the standard model is incorrect), then why does this model work so well in so many areas of science? (2) Whatever the “true nature” of time is, are there any advantages, to science, in replacing the standard model with a more complicated one? The purpose of this paper is to present a non-linear, mathematical model for time that enables us to answer question (1), and to partially answer question (2). Our discussion of question (2) is incomplete, but our results are intriguing. They also show promise of helping us understand some of the observations mentioned above. A rather natural extension of our model brings it into close contact with one that has been used in quantum theory (“Stochastically branching spacetime topology” by Roy Douglas [2]). These points of contact will also be discussed.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Royden, H. L.: 1968,Real Analysis 2nd Edition, Macmillan Pub. Co., New York
Savitt, S. F. (editor): 1995,Time's Arrows Today, Cambridge University Press
Taylor, A. E.: 1959,Advanced Calculus, Ginn and Company
Tifft, W. G.: 1991,ApJ,382, 396
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Devito, C.L. A non-linear model for time. Astrophys Space Sci 244, 357–369 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642306
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642306