Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in concepts of time from Aristotle to Einstein

  • Session 5. Gravitation and Time in General Relativity
  • Published:
Astrophysics and Space Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The meaning of time and motion is discussed, at first tracing conceptual changes from Aristotle to Galileo/Newton to Einstein. Different views of ‘time’ in 20th century physics are then examined, with primary focus on the revolutionary changes that came with the theory of general relativity. Implications of its new view in all domains of physics are discussed — from elementary particles to cosmology. The special role of Hamilton's quaternion calculus in equations of motion in general relativity is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. For Aristotle's views of time, see his Metaphysics, Book XII, Ch. 8, in McKeon, R.: 1941,The Basic Works of Aristotle (Random House)

  2. St. Augustine's views of time are expressed in his Confessions, Book XI. For a translation, see: Hyman, A. and Walsh, J. J., editors: 1973,Philosophy of the Middle Ages (Hackett)

  3. Maimonides, M., transl. Pines, S.: 1963,The Guide of the Perplexed (Chicago), Part II, Ch. 17

  4. Galilei, G., transl. Drake, S.: 1967,Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (California), p. 114

  5. Newton, I. transl. Cajori, B.: 1962,Principia, Volume I,The Motion of Bodies, (California), in Scholium, p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reichenbach, H.: 1982,The Direction of Time (California)

  7. Noether's theorem is discussed in: Lanczos, C.: 1966,The Variational Principles of Mechanics (Toronto), third Edition, p. 357

  8. Einstein summarizes his views in: “Autobiographical Notes”, in Schilpp, P. A., editor: 1949,Albert Einstein—Philosopher-Scientist (Open Court)

  9. Sachs, M.: 1993,Relativity in Our Time (Taylor and Francis), Ch. 7

  10. A mathematical as well as a logical argument against the validity of the ‘twin paradox’ is given in: Sachs, M.: 1971,Physics Today,24, 23. See also ref. 9, Ch. 12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goedel, K.: 1949,Rev. Mod. Phys.,21, 447

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sachs, M.: 1976,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,27, 225

    Google Scholar 

  13. The details of this derivation are given in: Sachs, M.: 1982,General Relativity and Matter (Reidel), Ch. 7

  14. Halberstam H. and Ingram, R. E.: 1967,The Mathematical Papers of Sir William Rowan Hamilton, Volume III, Algebra (Cambridge)

  15. Sachs, M.: 1994,Physics Essays,7, 490

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sachs, M.: 1989,Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie,14, 115. Also see ref. 9, Ch. 7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sachs, M.: 1975,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,14, 115

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bergson, H.: 1965,Duration and Simultaneity (Bobs-Merrill)

  19. I have compared the different types of ‘time’ in: Sachs, M.: 1978,La Recherche,9, 104

    Google Scholar 

  20. I have shown that the relativistic basis of cause and effect is a necessary concept in the ‘delayed-action-at-a-distance’ stand of Wheeler and Feynman, in: Sachs, M.: 1996, inThe Present Status of the Quantum Theory of Light, A Symposium in Honour of Jean-Pierre Vigier (Kluwer)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sachs, M. Changes in concepts of time from Aristotle to Einstein. Astrophys Space Sci 244, 269–281 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642298

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642298

Keywords

Navigation