Advertisement

Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 244, Issue 1–2, pp 249–261 | Cite as

Possible new properties of gravity

  • Tom van Flandern
Session 5. Gravitation and Time in General Relativity

Abstract

If static gravity or spacetime curvature information is carried by classical propagating particles or waves, a modern Laplace experiment places a lower limit on their speed of 1010c. The so-called Lorentzian modification of special relativity permits such speeds without need of tachyons. But there are other consequences. If ordinary gravity is carried by particles with finite collision cross-section, such collisions would progressively diminish its inverse square character, converting to inverse linear behavior on the largest scales. At scales greater than several kiloparsecs gravity can apparently be modeled, without need for dark matter, by an inverse linear law. The orbital motions of Mercury and Earth may also show traces of this effect. If gravity were carried by particles, a mass between two bodies could partially shield each of them from the gravity of the other. Anomalies are seen in the motions of certain artificial Earth satellites during eclipse seasons that behave like shielding of the Sun's gravity. Certain types of radiation pressure might cause a similar behavior but require many free parameters. Particle-gravity models would change our understanding of gravitation and our views of the nature of time in relativity theory.

Keywords

Mercury Lower Limit Dark Matter Free Parameter Special Relativity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eddington, A.: 1987,Space, Time, and Gravitation, Harper & Bros., New York, pg. 94Google Scholar
  2. Greenberger, D. M. and Overhauser, A. W.: 1980,Sci. Amer.,242, 66Google Scholar
  3. Laplace:, 1966Mechanique Celeste; English translation reprinted by Chelsea Publ., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. LeSage, G. L.: 1784.Berlin Mem., 404Google Scholar
  5. Lorentz, H. A.: 1931,Lectures on Theoretical Physics, vol. 3, Macmillan & Co., London, pp. 208–211Google Scholar
  6. Mansouri, R. and Sexl, R. U.: 1977,Gen. Rel. & Grav.,8, 497Google Scholar
  7. Robertson, H. P. and Noonan, T. W.: 1968,Relativity and Cosmology, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, cf. pp. 46–50Google Scholar
  8. Rosen, N.: 1940,Phys. Rev.,57, 147Google Scholar
  9. Rubincam, D. P.: 1990,J. Geo. Res.,95, 4881Google Scholar
  10. Slabinski, V. J.: 1996,Celestial Mechanics, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Van Flandern, T.: 1993Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets, North Atlantic BooksGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Flandern, T.: 1994,Meta Res. Bull.,3, 9Google Scholar
  13. Van Flandern, T.: 1995,Meta Res. Bull.,4, 1Google Scholar
  14. Wright, A. E., Disney, M. J. and Thompson, R. C.: 1990,Proc. Astr. Soc. Australia,8, 334Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom van Flandern
    • 1
  1. 1.Meta ResearchWashington, DC

Personalised recommendations