Abstract
Recent claim by Jeffreys that thermal contraction is the only mechanism yielding a real reduction of the Earth remotely near sufficient for mountain-formation is demonstrably incorrect, since the phase-change hypothesis has been shown to lead inescapably to more than ten times the maximum amount possible on his theory. In any event, the absence of folded and thrusted systems on Mars proves that thermal contraction cannot be a relevant process, while the fact that the terrestrial planets began as ccol all-solid bodies completely rules out thermal contraction a priori as a possibility. Apart from the purely verbal claims associated with plate-tectonice, the phase-change theory remains the sole contender resulting in geologically adequate contraction.
References
Cook, A. H.: 1972,Proc. Roy. Soc. A328, 301.
Hales, A. L.: 1953,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. Geophys. Suppl. 6, 460 and 488.
Jeffreys, H.: 1973,Ann. Rev. Earth Planetary Sci. 1, 11.
Kronig, R., de Boer, J., and Korringa, J.: 1946,Physica 12, 245.
Lyttleton, R. A.: 1965a,Proc. Roy. Soc. A287, 471.
Lyttleton, R. A.: 1965,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 129, 21.
Lyttleton, R. A.: 1965c,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 130, 95.
Lyttleton, R. A.: 1969,Astrophys. Space Sci. 5, 18.
Rabe, E. and Francis, M. P.: 1967,Astron. J. 72, 862.
Ramsey, W. H.: 1950,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 110, 325.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyttleton, R.A. Developments in geophysics. Astrophys Space Sci 28, L1–L5 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642256
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642256