Abstract
The recovery phase of the magnetospheric substorm is studied numerically by means of a two-dimensional time-dependent nonlinear resistive MHD code. The initial configuration was chosen from the earlier numerical model in which the magnetospheric substorm was driven by the solar wind plasmas. In order to study the recovery phase, the entering solar wind energy flux was reduced when the magnetospheric substorm was in its expansive phase. The system was found to respond instantly to this change and the result showed many characteristic features related to the recovery phase including the tailward motion of thex-point of the reconnected magnetic field lines and the restoration of a tail-like configuration of the magnetic field. Thex-point moved at almost the same speed of the plasma flow in the upstream region, which was considerably smaller than the speed of the plasma jetting or the speed of the plasmoid. As the recovery phase progressed, the plasma jetting across thex-point was reduced very much in the Earthside region. Although the plasma flow was generally in the Earthward direction in the Earthside region of thex-point, the tailward flow was also found near thex-point. The current density was reduced near thex-point and the neutral sheet was broadened in the recovered region. The plasma sheet also became thick in this region. During the recovery of the substorm, the energy conversion rate, both in the form of plasma acceleration and the Joule heating, was reduced. These results on the recovery phase together with the earlier simulation result on the expansive phase indicate that driven reconnection can be a viable mechanism for the magnetospheric substorm including the recovery phase.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birn, J.: 1980,J. Geophys. Res. 85, 1214.
Birn, J. and Hones, E. W., Jr.: 1981,J. Geophys. Res. 86, 6802.
Brecht, S. H., Lyon, J. G., Fedder, J. A., and Hain, K.: 1982,J. Geophys. Res. 87, 6098.
Caan, M. N., McPherron, R. L., and Russell, C. T.: 1977,J. Geophys. Res. 82, 4837.
Hones, E. W., Jr.: 1977,J. Geophys. Res. 82, 5633.
Hones, E. W., Jr., Bame, S. J., and Asbridge, J. R.: 1976,J. Geophys. Res. 81, 227.
Leboeuf, J. N., Tajima, T., Kennel, C. F., and Dawson, J. M.: 1978,Geophys. Res. Letters 5, 609.
Leboeuf, J. N., Tajima, T., Kennel, C. F., and Dawson, J. M.: 1981,Geophys. Res. Letters 8, 257.
Lyon, J., Brecht, S. H., Fedder, J. A., and Palmadesso, P. J.: 1980,Geophys. Res. Letters 7, 712.
Lyon, J., Brecht, S. H., Hubba, J. D., Fedder, J. A., and Palmadesso, P. J.: 1981,Geophys. Res. Letters 46, 1038.
McPherron, R. L., Russell, C. T., and Aubry, M. P.: 1973,J. Geophys. Res. 78, 3131.
Min, K., Okuda, H., and Sato, T.: 1985,J. Geophys. Res. 90, 4035.
Sato, T.: 1985,Phys. Rev. Letters 54, 1502.
Sato, T., Walker, R. J., and Ashour-Abdalla, M.: 1984,J. Geophys. Res. 89, 9761.
Wu, C. C., Walker, R. J., and Dawson, J. M.: 1981,Geophys. Res. Letters 8, 523.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Min, K.W. Substorm recovery phase. Astrophys Space Sci 150, 345–355 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00641729
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00641729