European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 297–301 | Cite as

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous nalbuphine in healthy subjects

  • M. W. Lo
  • F. H. Lee
  • W. L. Schary
  • C. C. WhitneyJr.
Originals

Summary

The pharmacokinetics of intravenously, intramuscularly, and subcutaneously administered nalbuphine were studied in three parallel groups of 12 healthy volunteers each. The subjects received single doses of 10 mg and 20 mg of nalbuphine separated by a one week washout period. Blood specimens were obtained up to 15 h after dosing for determination of nalbuphine.

Mean plasma nalbuphine concentrations 5 min after intravenous administration of 10 or 20 mg were 39 and 73 ng/ml, respectively. The mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) after intramuscular or subcutaneous administration of nalbuphine 10 mg were 29 and 31 ng/ml, respectively. Mean Cmax values after 20 mg doses were 60 and 56 ng/ml. Mean Cmax occurred 30 to 40 min after nalbuphine administration. The mean elimination half-lives of parenterally administered nalbuphine ranged between 2.2 and 2.6 h, regardless of dose given or route administered. The mean absolute bioavailability was 81% and 83% for the 10 and 20 mg intramuscular doses, respectively, and 79% and 76% following 10 and 20 mg of subcutaneous nalbuphine. The mean volumes of distribution (Vss) of the intravenously administered drug were 290 and 274 l and the mean systemic clearances were 1.6 and 1.5 l/min following administration of 10 and 20 mg doses, respectively.

Intramuscular and subcutaneous nalbuphine appear to be interchangeable based on the similarities in Cmax, mean times until maximum concentration, mean AUC data, and absolute bioavailabilities.

Key words

nalbuphine pharmacokinetics parenteral administration healthy volunteers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beaver WT, Feise GA (1978) A comparison of the analgesic effect of intramuscular nalbuphine and morphine in patients with postoperative pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 204: 487–496Google Scholar
  2. Benet LZ, Galeazzi RL (1979) Noncompartmental determination of the steady-state volume of distribution. J Pharm Sci 68: 1071–1074Google Scholar
  3. Bullingham RES, McQuay HJ, Moore RA (1983) Clinical pharmacokinetics of narcotic agonist-antagonist drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 8: 332–343Google Scholar
  4. Ehrnebro M, Boreus LO, Lonroth U (1977) Bioavability and first-pass metabolism of oral pentazocine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 22: 888–892Google Scholar
  5. Fahmy NR (1980) Nalbuphine in “balanced” anesthesia; its analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic effects. Anesthesiology 53: S66Google Scholar
  6. Forrest WH (1971) Report of the Veteran's Administration Cooperative Analgesic Study. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Scientific Meeting, Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, pp 239–281Google Scholar
  7. Gal TJ, Di Fazio CA (1981) Analgesia and ventilatory depression with nalbuphine. Anesthesiology 55: A375Google Scholar
  8. Gal TJ, Di Fazio CA, Moschicki MS (1982) Analgesic and respiratory depressant activity of nalbuphine: A comparison with morphine. Anesthesiology 57: 367–374Google Scholar
  9. Gibaldi M, Perrier D (1982) Pharmacokinetics. Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS (1978) Butorphanol: A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 16: 473–505Google Scholar
  11. Houde RW, Wallenstein SL, Rogers A, Kaiko RF (1976) Annual report of the analgesic studies section of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Problems of Drug Dependency Committee Proceedings, pp 149–168Google Scholar
  12. Isbell H (1977) The search for the non-addicting analgesic. Has it been worth it? Clin Pharmacol Ther 22: 377–384Google Scholar
  13. Jasinski DR (1979) Human pharmacology of narcotic antagonists. Br J Clin Pharmacol 7: 287S-290SGoogle Scholar
  14. Julien RM (1982) Effects of nalbuphine on normal and oxymorphone-depressed ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide challenge. Anestesiology 57: A320Google Scholar
  15. Lee G, De Maria AN, Amsterdam EA, Realyvasquez F, Angel J, Morrison S, Mason DT (1976) Comparative effects of morphine, meperidine, and pentazocine on cardiocirculatory dynamics in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 60: 949–955Google Scholar
  16. Lee G, Low RI, Amsterdam EA, DeMaria AN, Huber PW, Mason DT (1981) Hemodynamic effects of morphine and nalbuphine in acute myocardial infarction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29: 576–581Google Scholar
  17. Lo M-W, Juergens GP, Whitney CC (1984) Determination of nalbuphine in human plasma by automated high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 43: 159–168Google Scholar
  18. Neal EA, Meffin PJ, Gregory PB, Blaschke TF (1979) Enhanced bioavailability and decreased clearance of analgesics in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 77: 96–102Google Scholar
  19. Owen JA, Sitar DS, Berger L, Brownell L, Duke PC, Mitenko PA (1983) Age-related morphine kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 34: 364–368Google Scholar
  20. Pittman KA, Smyth RD, Mayol RF (1980) Serum levels of butorphanol by radioimmunoassay. J Pharm Sci 69: 160–163Google Scholar
  21. Popio KA, Jackson DH, Ross AM, Schreiner BF, Yu PN (1978) Hemodynamic and respiratory effects of morphine and butorphanol. Clin Pharmacol Ther 23: 281–287Google Scholar
  22. Romagnoli A, Keats AS (1978) Comparative hemodynamic effects of nalbuphine and morphine in patients with coronary artery disease. Bull Texas Inst 5: 19–24Google Scholar
  23. Romagnoli A, Keats AS (1980) Ceiling effect for respiratory depression by nalbuphine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 27: 478–485Google Scholar
  24. Stambaugh JE (1982) Evaluation of nalbuphine. Efficacy and safety in the management of chronic pain associated with advanced malignancy. Curr Ther Res 31: 393–401Google Scholar
  25. Stanski DR, Greenblatt DJ, Lowenstein E (1978) Kinetics of intravenous and intramuscular morphine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 24: 52–59Google Scholar
  26. Tammisto T, Tigerstedt I (1977) Comparison of the analgesic effects of intravenous nalbuphine and pentazocine in patients with postoperative pain. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 21: 390–394Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. W. Lo
    • 1
  • F. H. Lee
    • 2
  • W. L. Schary
    • 2
  • C. C. WhitneyJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Drug Metabolism SectionDu Pont PharmaceuticalsNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Medical ResearchDu Pont PharmaceuticalsWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations