Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 449–503 | Cite as

Lexical functional grammar as a model of linguistic competence

  • Paul Schachter
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Linguistic Competence Functional Grammar Lexical Functional Grammar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, Emmon: 1977, ‘Comments on the Paper by Chomsky’, in P. Culicoveret al. (eds.),Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Bresnan, Joan: 1982, ‘Control and Complementation’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 343–434.Google Scholar
  3. Bresnan, Joan (ed.): 1982,The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  4. Bresnan, Joan, Ronald Kaplan, Stanley Peters, and Annie Zaenen: 1982, ’Cross-serial Dependencies in Dutch‘,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 613–636.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, Noam: 1964, ‘Current Issues in Linguistic Theory’, in J. Fodor and J. Katz (eds.),The Structure of Language, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, Noam: 1965,Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, Noam: 1973, ‘Conditions on Transformations’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.),A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, Noam: 1980, Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, Noam: 1982, ’Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding‘,Linguistic Inquiry, Monograph No. 6.Google Scholar
  11. Dik, Simon: 1978,Functional Grammar, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Dik, Simon: 1980,Studies in Functional Grammar, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  13. Fodor, J., T. Bever, and M. Garrett: 1974,The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Gazdar, Gerald: 1981, ‘Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 12, 155–184.Google Scholar
  15. Gazdar, Gerald: 1982, ‘Phrase Structure Grammar’, in P. Jacobson and G. Pullum (eds.),The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Gazdar, Gerald and Geoffrey Pullum: 1982,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar: A Theoretical Synopsis, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
  17. Gil, David: 1984, ‘On the Notion of “Direct Object” in Patient Prominent Languages’, in F. Plank (ed.),Objects: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  18. Grosu, Alexander: 1981,Approaches to Island Phenomena, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Halvorsen, P.-K: forthcoming (as of 1982), ‘An Interpretive Procedure for Functional Structures‘, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.Google Scholar
  20. Jackdendoff, Ray: 1975, ‘Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon’, Language51, 639–671.Google Scholar
  21. Keenan, Edward: 1974, ‘The Functional Principle: Generalizing the Notion of ‘Subject of’’,Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 10, 298–309.Google Scholar
  22. Keenan, Edward: 1980, ‘Passive Is Phrasal (Not Sentential or Lexical)’, in T. Hoekstraet al. (ed.),Lexical Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. Klein, Ewan and Ivan Sag: 1982, ‘Semantic Type and Control’, in M. Barlowet al. (eds.),Developments in Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
  24. Lees, Robert: 1960,The Grammar of English Nominalizations, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  25. Maling, Joan and Annie Zaenen: 1982, ‘A Phrase Structure Account of Scandinavian Extraction Phenomena’, in P. Jacobson and G. Pullum (eds.),The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  26. Partee, Barbara (ed.): 1976,Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Perlmutter, David: 1980, ‘Relational Grammar’, in E. Moravcsik and J. Wirth (eds.),Syntax and Semantics, vol. 13:Current Approaches to Syntax, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Rappaport, Malka: 1980, ‘On the Derivation of Derived Nominals’, Ms., Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Ross, John:Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
  30. Sag, Ivan and Ewan Klein: 1982, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of English Expletive Pronoun Constructions’, in M. Barlowet al. (eds.),Developments in Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
  31. Schachter, Paul: 1976, ‘The Subject in Philippine Languages: Actor, Topic, Actor-Topic, or None of the Above’, in C. Li (ed.),Subject and Topic, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Schachter, Paul: 1977, ‘Reference-related and Role-related Properties of Subjects’, in P. Cole and J. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 8,Grammatical Relations, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Schachter, Paul: 1984, ‘Semantic-role-based Syntax in Toba Batak’, in P. Schachter (ed.),Studies in the Structure of Toba Batak, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 5.Google Scholar
  34. Schachter, Paul: 1985, ‘Semantic and Syntactic Functions in Toba Batak’, in A. M. Bolkesteinet al. (eds.),Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  35. Schachter, Paul and Susan Mordechay: 1983, ‘A Phrase Structure Account of “Nonconstituent” Conjunction’, in M. Barlowet al. (eds.),Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, vol. 2, Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford.Google Scholar
  36. Schachter, Paul and Fe Otanes: 1972,Tagalog Reference Grammar, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  37. Steedman, Mark: 1985, ‘LFG and Psychological Explanation’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 359–385.Google Scholar
  38. Thompson, Sandra: 1974, ‘On the Issue of Productivity in the Lexicon’, in S. Thompson and C. Lord (eds.),Approaches to the Lexicon, UCLA Papers in Syntax, No. 6.Google Scholar
  39. Visser, F: 1963-1973,An Historical Syntax of the English Language, F. J. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
  40. Wasow, Thomas; 1978, ‘Remarks on Processing, Constraints, and the Lexicon’, in D. Waltz (ed.),Proceedings of the Second Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Wasow, Thomas: 1980, ‘Major and Minor Rules in Lexical Grammar’, in T. Hoekstraet al. (eds.),Lexical Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  42. Wouk, Fay: 1984, ‘Scalar Transitivity and Trigger Choice in Toba Barak’, in P. Schachter (ed.),Studies in the Structure of Tobak Batak, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics, No. 5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Schachter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations