Astrophysics and Space Science

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 337–347 | Cite as

High fluences of low energy (10–25 MeV/amu) C, N, O and heavier ions at 450 km altitude; results from the skylab experiment

  • S. Biswas
  • N. Durgaprasad
  • J. Nevatia
  • V. S. Venkatavaradan
  • J. N. Goswami
  • U. B. Jayanthi
  • D. Lal
  • S. K. Mattoo
Article

Abstract

High fluences (i.e. the integrated fluxes) of C, N, O group of nuclei and some of the heavier ones, in the energy interval 10–25 MeV/amu, have been identified in a Lexan polycarbonate detector assembly exposed on the exterior of the Skylab for 73 days. The existence of large flux of low energy nuclei in the Skylab orbit is surprising since the minimum geomagnetic cut-off energy for fully stripped nuclei (A/Z=2) is ≃50 MeV/amu at the orbit of the satellite, and the period of exposure was a ‘quiet’ one, free from significant solar particle events. We have considered two sources for these particles: (i) partly ionized interplanetary ions accelerated within the magnetosphere and (ii) heavy nuclei trapped in the Earth's radiation belt. The flux and composition of the nuclei observed by us seem to be significantly different from those in the trapped radiation as known at present; hence it seems likely that the major part of the observed flux may be interpreted, in terms of partly ionized interplanetary ions that are further accelerated in the magnetosphere.

Keywords

Major Part Polycarbonate Heavy Nucleus Energy Interval Radiation Belt 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chan, J. H. and Price, P. B.: 1974,Astrophys. J. Letters 190, L39.Google Scholar
  2. Fisk, L. A., Kozlovsky, B., and Ramaty, R.: 1974,Astrophys. J. Letters 190, L35.Google Scholar
  3. Hayakawa, S., Ito, K., and Terashima, Y.: 1958,Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 6, 1.Google Scholar
  4. Henke, R. P., Benton, E. V., and Heckman, H. H.: 1970,Rad. Effects 3, 43.Google Scholar
  5. Hovestadt, D., Vollmer, O., Gloeckler, G., and Fan, C. Y.: 1973,Phys. Rev. Letters 31, 650.Google Scholar
  6. McDonald, F. B., Teegarden, B. J., Trainor, J. H., and Webber, W. R.: 1974,Astrophys. J. Letters 187, L105.Google Scholar
  7. Mogro-Campero, A.: 1972,J. Geophys. Res. 77, 2799.Google Scholar
  8. Price, P. B. and Fleischer, R. L.: 1971,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 21, 295.Google Scholar
  9. Shea, M. A., Smart, D. F., and McCall, J. R.: 1968,Canad. J. Phys. 46, S1098.Google Scholar
  10. Van Allen, J., Bruce, A., Randall, A., and Krimigis, S. M.: 1970,J. Geophys. Res. 75, 6085.Google Scholar
  11. Webber, W. R.: 1973,13th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. 5, 3568.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Biswas
    • 1
  • N. Durgaprasad
    • 1
  • J. Nevatia
    • 1
  • V. S. Venkatavaradan
    • 1
  • J. N. Goswami
    • 2
  • U. B. Jayanthi
    • 2
  • D. Lal
    • 2
  • S. K. Mattoo
    • 2
  1. 1.Tata Institute of Fundamental ResearchBombayIndia
  2. 2.Physical Research LaboratoryAhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations