Skip to main content

On the existence of a modal antinomy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Alan Ross and Belnap, Nuel D., ‘A Simple Proof of Gödel's Completeness Theorem’ (Abstract),The Journal of Symbolic Logic,24 (1959), 320.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan, David and Montague, Richard, ‘A Paradox Regained’,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic,1 (1960), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Montague, Richard, ‘Semantical Closure and Non-Finite Axiomatizability’,Infinitistic Methods, Pergamon Press, New York, 1961, pp. 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Montague, Richard, ‘Syntactical Treatments of Modality with Corollaries on Reflexion Principles and Finite Axiomatizability’,Acta Philosophica Fennica 16 (1963), 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Niemi, Gunnar, ‘Modality and Self Reference’, Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1970. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Order No. 71-4694.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quine, W. V., ‘Concatenation as a Basis for Arithmetic’,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (1946), 105–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Quine, W. V., ‘Three Grades of Modal Involvement’,The Ways of Paradox, Random House, New York, 1966, pp. 156–74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smullyan, Raymond M.,First Order Logic, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tarski, Alfred, Mostowski, A., and Robinson R. M.,Undecidable Theories, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niemi, G. On the existence of a modal antinomy. Synthese 23, 463–476 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00636296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00636296