A comparative analysis of physiological responses at submaximal workloads during different laboratory simulations of field cycling

  • Glen P. Kenny
  • Francis D. Reardon
  • Alain Marion
  • Jim S. Thoden
Original Article


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between heart rate (fc), oxygen consumption (VO2), peak force and average force developed at the crank in response to submaximal exercise employing a racing bicycle which was attached to an ergometer (RE), ridden on a treadmill (TC) and ridden on a 400-m track (FC). Eight male trained competitive cyclists rode at three pre-determined work intensities set at a proportion of their maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max): (1) below lactate threshold [work load that produces a (VO2) which is 10% less than the lactate threshold VO2 (sub-LT)], (2) lactate threshold VO2 (LT), and (3) above lactate threshold [workload that produces a VO2 which is 10% greater than lactate threshold VO2 (supra-LT)], and equated across exercise modes on the basis offc. Voltage signals from the crank arm were recorded as FM signals for subsequent representation of peak and average force. Open circuit VO2 measurements were done in the field by Douglas bag gas collection and in the laboratory by automated gas collection and analysis.fc was recorded with a telemeter (Polar Electro Sport Tester, PE3000). Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed: (1) in VO2 between FC and both laboratory conditions at sub-LT intensity and LT intensities, (2) in peak force between FC and TC at sub-LT intensity, (3) in average force between FC and RE at sub-LT. No significant differences were demonstrated at supra-LT intensity for VO2. Similarly no significant differences were observed in peak and average force for either LT or supra-LT intensities. These data indicate that equating work intensities on the basis offc measured in laboratory conditions would overestimate the VO2 which would be generated in the field and conversely, that usingfc measured in the laboratory to establish field work intensity would underestimate mechanical workload experienced in the field.

Key words

Cycling Heart rate Oxygen consumption Crank forces Mechanical performance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astrand P, Rodahl K (1986) Textbook of work physiology, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Astrand I, Fugelli P, Karlsson C, Rodahl K, Vokac Z (1973) Energy output and work stress in coastal fishing. Scand J Clin Invest 31:105Google Scholar
  3. Bevegaard S, Freyshcuss U, Strandell T (1966) Circulatory adaptation to arm and leg exercise in supine and sitting position. J Physiol (Lond) 21:37–46Google Scholar
  4. Boer R de, Vos E, Hutter W, Groot G de, Van Ingen Schenau G (1987) Physiological and biomechanical comparison of roller skating and speed skating on ice. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:562–569Google Scholar
  5. Booyens J, Harvey GR (1960) The pulse rate as a means of measuring metabolic rate in man. Can J Biochem Physiol 38: 1301–1309Google Scholar
  6. Brodowicz G, King D, Ribisl P, Brone W, Meler H (1982) Anaerobic threshold during cycle ergometry with and without toe clips. Med Sci Sport Exerc 14:161Google Scholar
  7. Brown S, Banister E (1985) Thermoregulation during prolonged actual and laboratory-simulated bicycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 54:125–130Google Scholar
  8. Carmichael J, Loomis J, Hodgson J (1982) The effect of crank length on oxygen consumption and heart rate when cycling at a constant power output. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:162Google Scholar
  9. Christensen C, Harald F, Foenstelien E, Aadlan E, Refsun H (1983) A critical evaluation of energy expenditure based on individual O2 consumption/heart rate curves and average daily heart rate. Am J Clin Nutr 37:468–472Google Scholar
  10. Coast J, Cox R, Welch H (1986) Optimal pedalling rate in prolonged bouts of cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 18:225–230Google Scholar
  11. Conrad D, Thomas T (1983) Bicycle crank arm length and oxygen consumption in trained cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exere 15: 111Google Scholar
  12. Croissant P, Boileau R (1984) Effect of pedal rate, brake load and power on metabolic responses to bicycle ergometer work. Ergonomics 27:691–700Google Scholar
  13. Davis R, Hull M (1981) Measurement of pedal loading in bicycling. J Biomechanics 14:857–872Google Scholar
  14. Faria I, Dix C, Frazer C (1978) Effect of body position during cycling on heart rate, pulmonary ventilation, oxygen uptake and work output. J Sports Med 18:49–56Google Scholar
  15. Faria I, Sjojaard G, Brone-Petersen F (1982) Oxygen cost during different pedalling speeds for constant power output. J Sports Med 22:295–299Google Scholar
  16. Fernandez E, Mohler J, Butler J (1974) Comparison of oxygen consumption measured at steady state and progressive rates of work. J Appl Physiol 37:982–987Google Scholar
  17. Gaesser G, Brooks G (1975) Muscular efficiency during steady state rate: effect of speed and work rate. J Appl Physiol 38: 1132–1139Google Scholar
  18. Groot G de, Schreurs A, Van Ingen Scherau G (1983) Portable lightweight Douglas bag instrument for use during various types of exercise. Int J Sports Med 4:132–134Google Scholar
  19. Hagberg J, Giese M, Schneider R (1978) Comparison of the three procedures for measuring VO2max in competitive cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 39: 47–52Google Scholar
  20. Hagberg J, Mullin J, Giese M, Spitznagel E (1981) Effect of pedalling rate on submaximal exercise responses of competitive cyclists. J Appl Physiol 51:447–451Google Scholar
  21. Harrison M, Brown G, Bolyaun A (1982) The ‘Oxylog’: an evaluation. Ergonomics 25:809–820Google Scholar
  22. Kiblom A, Persson J (1981) Cardiovascular response to combined dynamic and static exercise. Circ Res 48 [suppl I]:193–197Google Scholar
  23. Laurence Shennum P, deVries H (1976) The effect of saddle height on oxygen consumption during bicycle ergometer work. Med Sci Sports 8:121Google Scholar
  24. Leblanc J (1957) Use of heart rate as an index of work output. J Appl Physiol 10:275–280Google Scholar
  25. Louhevaara V, Imarinen J, Oja P (1985) Comparison of three field methods for measuring oxygen consumption. Ergonomics 28:463Google Scholar
  26. Maas S, Kok M, Westra H, Kemper H (1989) The validity of the use heart rate in estimating oxygen consumption in static and in combine static/dynamic exercise. Ergonomics 32:141–148Google Scholar
  27. Moffat R, Sparling P (1985) Effect of toe clips during bicycle ergometry on VO2max in competitive cyclists. Res Q Exerc Sports 56:54–57Google Scholar
  28. Nielsen R, Meyer J (1987) Evaluation of metabolism from heart rate in industrial work. Ergonomics 30:563–572Google Scholar
  29. Nordeen-Snyder K (1977) The effect of bicycle seat height variation upon oxygen consumption and lower limb kinematics. Med Sci Sports 9:113–117Google Scholar
  30. Prampero P di, Cortili G, Celentano F, Cerretelli P (1971) Physiological aspects of rowing. J Appl Physiol 31:853–857Google Scholar
  31. Pugh L (1974) The relation of oxygen intake and speed in competition cycling and comparative observations on the bicycle ergometer. J Physiol (Lond) 241:795–808Google Scholar
  32. Rodahl K, Vokac Z, Fugelli P, Vaage O, Maehlums S (1974) Circulatory strain, estimated energy output and catecholamine excretion in Norwegian Coastal Fisherman. Ergonomics 77:585–602Google Scholar
  33. Ribisl P, Rejeski W, Brodowicz G, King D (1982) Influence of training and instrumentation upon ratings of perceived exertion in cycle ergometey. Med Sci Sport Exerc 14:158Google Scholar
  34. Seabury J, Adams W, Ramey M (1977) Influence of pedalling rate and power output on energy expenditure during bicycle ergometry. Ergonomics 20:491–498Google Scholar
  35. Shennum L, deVries H (1976) The effect of saddle height on oxygen consumption during bicycle ergometer work. Med Sci Sports 8:119–121Google Scholar
  36. Stromme S, Ingjer F, Meen H (1977) Assessment of maximal aerobic power in specifically trained athletes. J Appl Physiol 42:833–837Google Scholar
  37. Thoden J, Wilson B, MacDougall J (1982) Testing aerobic power. In: MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ (eds) Physiological testing of the elite athlete. Mouvement New York, pp 39–54Google Scholar
  38. Vokac Z, Bell H, Bautz-Holtner E, Rodahl K (1975) Oxygen uptake/heart rate relationship in leg and arm exercise, sitting and standing. J Appl Physiol 39:54Google Scholar
  39. Washburn R, Montoye H (1985) Reliability of the heart rate response to submaximal upper and lower body exercise. Res Q Exere Sport 56:166–169Google Scholar
  40. Wilmore J (1984) The assessment of and variation in aerobic power in world class athletes as related to specific sports. Am J Sports Med 12:120–127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glen P. Kenny
    • 3
    • 2
  • Francis D. Reardon
    • 3
  • Alain Marion
    • 1
  • Jim S. Thoden
    • 3
  1. 1.Coaching Association of CanadaOttawa
  2. 2.School of Human KineticsUniversity of OttawaOttawa
  3. 3.Laboratory for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Room 102 Frank Kennedy BuildingUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations