Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 347–357 | Cite as

The situated processing of situated language

  • Susan U. Stucky


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Situate Processing Situate Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barwise, K. Jon: 1987, ‘Unburdening the Language of Thought’, inTwo Replies, Report No. CSLI-87-74, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  2. Barwise, K. Jon and John Perry: 1983,Situations and Attitudes, Bradford Books/The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, Robin: forthcoming, ‘Fact Algebras: Representation, Psychology or Reality?’, in Ruth Kempson (ed.),Mental Representation and Properties of Logical Form, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  4. Gawron, Jean Mark: 1982, ’The GPSG Linguistics System’, in Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the ACL in Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  5. Grosz, Barbara J., et al.: 1985, ‘The TEAM Natural-Language Interface System’, Final Report: Project 4865, Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, Mark and Ewan Klein: 1986, ‘Discourse, Anaphora and Parsing’, in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics–24th Annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, August, 1986, Institut fuer Kommunikationsforschung und Phonetik, Bonn University, Bonn.Google Scholar
  7. Partee, Barbara: 1979, ‘Semantics — Mathematics or Psychology’, in R. Bauerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  8. Perry, John R.: 1986a, ‘Circumstantial Attitudes and Benevolent Cognition’, in J. Butterfield (ed.),Language, Mind, and Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. Also available as Report No. CSLI-85-53, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. Perry, John R.: 1986b, ‘Perception, Action, and the Structure of Believing’, in R. Grandy and R. Warner (eds.),Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  10. Searle, John, R.: 1980, ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’,The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 417–457.Google Scholar
  11. Shieber, Stuart M.: 1984, ‘The Design of a Computer Language for Linguistic Information’, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics — 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford, California, pp. 362–366.Google Scholar
  12. Shieber, Stuart M.: 1986, ‘Separating Linguistic Analyses from Linguistic Theories’, Alvey/ICL Workshop on Linguistic Theory and Computer Applications, University of Manchester, September, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, Brian Cantwell: 1986a, ‘The Correspondence Continuum’, Proceedings of the Sixth Canadian AI Conference, Montrael. Also available as Report No. CSLI-87-71, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, 1987 and to appear inArtificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, Brian Cantwell: 1986b, ‘Varieties of Self-Reference’, in Proceedings of the 1986 Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, California, pp. 19–43, revised version to appear inArtificial Intelligence Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan U. Stucky
    • 1
  1. 1.IRLPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations