Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Home range scaling: intraspecific and comparative trends

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Intraspecific and intrasexual variation in home range size, body mass and ecological productivity is examined in three selected species of Carnivora (Felis rufus: Canis latrans; Ursus americanus), reflecting different diets. We then compare the intraspecific results with prior cross-species studies. Home range size and body mass inFelis rufus are positively and significantly correlated, similar to other comparative studies. For both intraspecific and intrasexual analyses of all three species, home range size and latitude are strongly correlated. Home range size scales with latitude more steeply as the proportion of meat increases in the diet of each species. That is, the slope of home range size on latitude is greatest in the meat-eatingFelis rufus followed by a shallower slope in the omnivorousCanis latrans and the most shallow slope in the frugivorous/folivorousUrsus americanus. These differences in slope are consistent with models of trophic level biomass change with variation in productivity, and parallel the dietary differences observed in cross-species differences in home range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alt GL, Alt FW, Lindzey JS (1976) Home range and activity patterns of black bears in northeastern Pennsylvania. Proc Northeast Sec of The Wildl Soc 33:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstrup SC, Beecham J (1976) Activity patterns of radio-collared black bears in Idaho. J Wildl Manage 40:340–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Andelt WF (1985) Behavioral ecology of coyotes in south Texas. Wild Monogr 91:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Andelt WF, Gipson PS (1979) Home range, activity, and daily movements of coyotes. J Wildl Manage 43:944–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey TN (1974) Social organization of a bobcat population. J Wildl Manage 38:435–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M (1982) Coyote (Canis latrans) In: Chapan JA, Feldhamer GA (eds) Wild mammals of North America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore pp 447–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeman LE (1975) Population characteristics, movements, and activities of the black bear (Ursus americanus) in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee

  • Berg WE (1981) Ecology of bobcats in northern Minnesota. In: Blum LG, Escherich PH (eds) Bobcat research conference proceedings. Nat Wild Fed Sci Ser no 6 pp 55–61

  • Berg WE, Chesness RA (1978) Ecology of coyotes in Northern Minnesota. In: Bekoff M (ed) Coyotes: biology, behavior and management. Academic Press, New York pp 229–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal 24:346–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder WA III (1984) Size, function, and life history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Agostino RB, Pearson ES (1973) Testing for departures from normality. I. Fuller empirical results for the distribution of b2 and\(\sqrt {b_1 } \). Biometrika 60:613–622

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Agostino RB, Belanger A, D'Agostino Jr. RB (1990) A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Amer Statistician 44:316–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Damuth J (1981) Home range, home range overlap, and species energy use among herbivorous mammals. Biol J Linn Soc 15:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • du Toit JT (1990) Home range — body mass relations: a field study on African browsing ruminants. Oecologia 85:301–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards LL (1975) Home range of the coyote in southern Idaho. M.S. Thesis, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho

  • Eisenberg JF (1981) The mammalian radiations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendley TT, Buie DE (1986) Seasonal home range and movement patterns of the bobcat on the Savannah River Plant. In: Miller SD, Everett DD (eds) Cats of the world: biology, conservation, and management. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC pp 237–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Garshelis DL, Pelton MR (1981) Movements of black bears in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. J Wildl Manage 45:912–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Gier HT (1975) Ecology and behavior of the coyote (Canis latrans). In: Fox MW (ed) The wild canids. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York pp 247–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipson PS, Sealander JA (1972) Home range and activity of the coyote (Canis latrans frustror) in Arkansas. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Game Fish Comm 26:82–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman JL (1984) The behavioural ecology of carnivores. D.Phil. Dissertation, University of Sussex, England

  • Gittleman JL (1989) The comparative approach in ethology: aims and limitations. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol. 8. Plenum Press, New York pp 55–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman JL, Harvey PH (1982) Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behay Ecol Sociobiol 10:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith MA, Fendley TT (1986) Influence of density on movement behavior and home range size of adult bobcats on the Savannah River Plant. In: Miller SD, Everett DD (eds) Cats of the world: biology, conservation, and management. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC pp 261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall HT, Newsom JD (1976) Summer ranges and movements of bobcats in bottomland hardwoods of southern Louisiana. Proc Ann Conf Southeast Assoc Game Fish Comm 32:427–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Harestad AS, Bunnell FL (1979) Home range and body weight —a re-evaluation. Ecology 60:389–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Clutton-Brock TH (1981) primate home-range size and metabolic needs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellgren EC, Vaughan MR (1986) Home range and movements of winter-active black bears in the Great Dismal Swamp. Int Conf Bear Res and Manage 7:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchings JT, Story JD (1979) Preliminary studies of bobcat activity patterns. Proc Ann Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 32:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancia RA, Woodward DK, Miller SD (1986) Summer movement patterns and habitat use by bobcats on Croatan National Forest, North Carolina. In: Miller SD, Everett DD (eds) Cats of the world: biology, conservation, and management. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC pp 425–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Laundré JW (1981) Home-range use by coyotes in Idaho. Anim Behav 29:449–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Laundré JW, Keller BL (1984) Home range of coyotes: a critical review. J Wildl Manage 48:127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawhead DN (1984) BobcatLynx rufus home range, density and habitat preference in south-central Arizona. Southwest Nat 29:105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCount AL (1980) Some aspects of bear ecology in the Arizona chaparral. In: Martinka CJ, McArthur KL (eds) Bears-their biology and management. Bear Biol Assoc Conf Ser 3 U S Gov Print Off, Washington, DC pp 175–179

  • Lembeck M (1978) Bobcat study, San Diego County, California. Calif Dept Fish and Game, Rep Fed Aid Nongame Wildl Invest Proj E-W-2, Study IV-1.7 22pp

  • Lembeck M (1986) Long term behavior and population dynamics of an unharvested bobcat population in San Diego County. In: Miller SD, Everett DD (eds) Cats of the world: biology, conservation, and management. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC pp 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth H (1973) Primary production: terrestrial ecosystems. Human Ecol 1:303–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey JS, Kordek WS, Matula GJ Jr, Piekielek WP (1976) The black bear in Pennsylvania-status, movements, values, and management. Proc Third Int Conf on Bears, Binghampton, New York pp 215–224

  • Litvaitis JA (1978) Movements and habitat use of coyotes on the Witchita mountains National Wildlife Refuge. M.S. Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma

  • Litvaitis JA, Major JT, Sherburne JA (1987) Influence of season and human-induced mortality on spatial organization of bobcats (Felis rufus) in Maine. J Mamm 68:100–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvaitis JA, Shaw JH (1980) Coyote movement, habitat use, and food habits in southwestern Oklahoma. J Wildl Manage 44:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvaitis JA, Sherburne JA, Bissonette JA (1986) Bobcat habitat use and home range size in relation to prey density. J Wildl Manage 50:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Harvey PH (1983) Energetic constraints on home range size. Am Nat 121:120–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Harvey PH, Clutton-Brock TH (1983) Vertebrate home range size and energetic requirements. In: Swingland IR, Greenwood PJ (eds) The ecology of animal movement. Clarendon Press, Oxford pp 32–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Major JT, Sherburne JA (1987) Interspecific relationships of coyotes, bobcats, and red foxes in western Maine. J Wildl Manage 51:606–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares MA, Lacher TE, Willig MR, Bitar NA, Adams R, Klinger A, Tazik D (1982) An experimental analysis of social spacing inTamias striatus. Ecology 63:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall AD, Jenkins JH (1966) Movements and home ranges of bobcats as determined by radio-tracking in the upper coastal plain of west-central South Carolina. Proc Southeast Assoc Game Fish Comm 20:206–214

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab BK (1963) Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Am Nat 97:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • McNab BK (1983) Ecological and behavioral consequences of adaptation to various food resources. In: Eisenberg JF, Kleiman DG (eds) Advances in the study of mammalian behavior. Spec Publ Am Soc Mamm 7:664–697

  • McNaughton SJ, Oesterheld M, Frank DA, Williams KJ (1989) Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats. Nature 341:142–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller SD (1980) The ecology of the bobcat in southern Alabama. Ph.D. dissertation, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama

  • Oksanen L, Ericson L (1987) Dynamics of tundra and taiga populations of herbaceous plants in relation to the Tihomirov-Fretwell and Kalela-Tast hypotheses. Oikos 50:381–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen L, Fretwell SD, Arruda J, Niemela P (1981) Expoloitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am Nat 118:240–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel MD, Harvey PH (1988) Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data. Quart. Rev Biol 63:413–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Provost EE, Nelson CA, Marshall AD (1973) Population dynamics and behavior in the bobcat. In: Eaton RL (ed) The World's Cats. World Wildlife Safari, Winston, Oregon pp 42–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrah D (1984) Social distribution and population estimates of coyotes in north-central Montana. J Wildl Manage 48:679–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss MJ (1988) Body size and home range area. Trends Ecol Evol 3:85–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds DG, Beecham JJ (1980) Home range activities and reproduction of black bears in west-central Idaho. In: Martinka CJ, McArthur KL (eds) Bears-their biology and management. Bear Biol Assoc Conf Ser 3 U S Gov Print Off, Washington, DC pp 181–190

  • Rolley RE (1985) Dynamics of a harvested bobcat population in Oklahoma. J Wildl Manage 49:283–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell M (1989) The mating tactics and spacing patterns of solitary carnivores. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York pp 164–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent AB, Allen SH, Hastings JO (1987) Spatial relations between sympatric coyotes and red foxes in North Dakota. J Wildl Manage 51:285–293

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1985) SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1968) Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49:123–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioal sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th Edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer JT (1982) Movement patterns of coyotes in south central Washington. J Wildl Manage 46:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner PW, Hill EP, Wooding JB (1984) Activity and movements of coyotes in Mississippi and Alabama. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 38:174–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner FB, Jeinrich RI, Weintraub WD (1969) Home ranges and body size of lizards. Ecology 50:1076–1081

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1970) Communities and ecosystems. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH, Likens GE (1973) Primary production: the biosphere and man. Human Ecol 1:357–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff RA, Keller BL (1982) Dispersal, daily activity, and home range of coyotes in Southeastern Idaho. Northwest Sci 56:199–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Young BF, Ruff RL (1982) Population dynamics and movements of black bears in east central Alberta. J Wildl Manage 46:845–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Zezulak DS (1981) Northeastern California bobcat study. California Dept Fish and Game Rep Fed Aid Wildl Rest Proj W-54-R-12, job IV-3, 19pp

  • Zezulak DS, Schwab RG (1980) Bobcat biology in a Mojave Desert community. California Dept Fish and Game Rep Fed Aid Wildl Rest Proj W-54-R-12, job IV-4 25pp

  • Zwank PJ, Shiflet BL, Newsom JD (1985) Habitat use by bobcats in upland forests of Louisisana. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish and Wildl Agencies 39:313–320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology and Graduate Program in Life Sciences (Ethology), University of Tennessee, 37996-0810, Knoxville, TN, USA

    Matthew E. Gompper & John L. Gittleman

Authors
  1. Matthew E. Gompper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John L. Gittleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gompper, M.E., Gittleman, J.L. Home range scaling: intraspecific and comparative trends. Oecologia 87, 343–348 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634589

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634589

Key words

Search

Navigation