Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effects of the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride and the D1 antagonist SCH-23390 were examined, in rats, in two-bottle preference tests (sucrose versus water) and in single-bottle tests, at different sucrose concentrations. Both drugs decreased sucrose intake in single bottle tests, at low sucrose concentrations, but had no effect at high concentrations; reducing drive level had exactly the opposite pattern of effects. In two-bottle tests, both drugs reduced preference for the weakest sucrose concetration (0.7%) but increased preference for the strongest concentration (34%). The effects of antagonizing either subtype of DA receptor appear to be similar to those of reducing the concentration of sucrose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey CS, Hsiao S, King JE (1986) Hedonic reactivity to sucrose in rats: modification by pimozide. Physiol Behav 38:447–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Cheng M, Hahn BL, Hoffman DC, Mazurski EJ, Morency MA, Ramm P, Stewart RJ (1987) Effects of extinction, pimozide, SCH-23390, and metoclopramide on food-rewarded operant responding of rats. Psychopharmacology 92:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac M (1971) Physiological role of pleasure. Science 173:1103–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipkin RE, McQuade RD, Iorio LC (1987) D1 and D2 dopamine binding site up-regulation and apomorphine-induced stereotypy. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 28:477–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SJ, Jackson A, Kirkham TC, Turkish S (1988) Endorphins, opiates and food intake. In: Rogers JR, Cooper SJ (eds) Endorphins, opiates and behavioural processes. Wiley, Chichester, pp 143–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A, Carlisle H (1985) Neuroleptic-induced deficits in operant responding for temperature reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:761–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1983) Dissociable effects ofd-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and alpha-flupenthixol on choice and rate measures of reinforcement in the rat. Pyschopharmacology 79:180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger HC, Carter DA, Phillips AG (1976) Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than reduced reward. Psychopharmacology 47:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary N, Smith GP (1985) Pimozide decreases the reinforcing effect of sham-fed sucrose in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:787–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert DB, Cooper SJ (1987a) Effects of dopamine antagonists on fluid intake and salt preference in male and female rats. J Psychopharmacol 1:47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert DB, Cooper SJ (1987b) Effects of the dopamine D-1 antagonist SCH-23390 and the D-2 antagonist sulpiride on saline acceptance-rejection in water-deprived rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 26:425–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramling SE, Fowler SC, Collins KR (1984) Some effects of pimozide on nondeprived rats licking sucrose solutions in an anhedonia paradigm. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21:617–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoebel BG, Hernandez L, McLean S, Stanley BG, Aulissi EF, Glimcher P, Margolin D (1981) Catecholamines, enkephalin and neurotensin in feeding and reward. In: Hoebel BG, Novin D (eds) The neurobiology of feeding and reward. Haer Institute, Brunswick, Maine, pp 465–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Iorio LC, Barnett A, Leitz FH, Houser VP, Korduba CA (1983) SCH-23390, a potential benzazepine antipsychotic with unique interactions on dopaminergic systems. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 226:462–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenner P, Elliot PNC, Clow A, Reavill C, Marsden CD (1978) A comparison of in vitro and in vivo dopamine receptor antagonism produced by substituted benzamide drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol 30:46–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebabian JW, Calne DB (1979) Multiple receptors for dopamine. Nature 227:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz SF (1982) Neurochemical systems of the hypothalamus. Control of feeding and drinking behaviour and water electrolyte excretion. In: Morgane, PJ, Panksepp J (eds) Handbook of the hypothalamus, vol 3A. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz SF, Rossakis C (1979) Pharmacological characterization of perifornical hypothalamus dopamine receptors mediating feeding inhibition in the rat. Brain Res 172:115–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Iverson MT, Wilkie D, Fibiger HC (1988) Alteration in the perception of food quantity by rats induced by manipulations of hunger and food sweetness. Learn Motiv (in press)

  • Mook DG (1969) Some determinants of preference and aversion in the rat. Ann NY Acad Sci 157:1158–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore NA, Axton MS (1988) Production of climbing behaviour in mice requires both D1 and D2 receptor activation. Psychopharmacology 94:263–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley MJ, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1984) The effects of pimozide on variable-internal performance: a test of the anhedonia hypothesis of the mode of action of neuroleptics. Psychopharmacology 84:531–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima S, McKenzie GM (1986) Reduction of the rewarding effect of brain stimulation by a blockade of dopamine D1 receptor with SCH 23390. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:919–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffman C (1982) Taste: a model of incentive motivation. In: Pfaff DW (ed) The physiological mechanisms of motivation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 61–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET, Rolls BJ, Kelly PH, Shaw SG, Wood RJ, Dale RI (1974) The relative attentuation of self-stimulation, eating and drinking produced by dopamine-receptor blockade. Psychopharmacologia 38:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider LH, Gibbs J, Smith GP (1986) Selective D1 or D2 antagonists inhibit sucrose sham feeding in rats. Appetite 7:294–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GP, Gibbs J (1979) Postprandial satiety. In: Sprague J, Epstein A (eds) Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology, vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 179–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Towell A, Muscat R, Willner P (1987) Effects of pimozide on sucrose consumption and preference. Psychopharmacology 92:262–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten HP, Watson SD (1985) Sham feeding as a procedure for assessing the influence of diet palatability on food intake. Physiol Behav 28:401–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behaviour: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Bozarth MA (1984) Brain reward circuitry: four elements “wired” in apparent series. Brain Res Bull 12:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenakis S, Sclafani A (1981) The effects of pimozide on the consumption of a palatable saccharin-glucose solution in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:435–442

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muscat, R., Willner, P. Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference. Psychopharmacology 99, 98–102 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634461

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634461

Key words

Navigation