Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrolysis of low-molecular-weight soil peptides by immobilized proteases in column and batch reaction systems

  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Organic matter was extracted from three soils, a cultivated Berwick sandy loam, a cultivated Franklin loamy sand, and an uncultivated Cumberland silty loam. Gel-permeation chromatography was used to separate organic matter extracts into high- (HMW) and low-molecular-weight (LMW) fractions. Reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography was used to separate and collect the LMW peptide fractions. Peptide samples were hydrolyzed with immobilized proteases attached to beaded agarose and carboxymethyl cellulose in column and batch reaction systems. The chromatograms suggested that peptides are bound to common soil components. The amino acids released in the greatest percentages were relatively non-polar. Large percentages of serine, glycine, alanine, threonine, and valine were observed in the LMW soil peptides. Little aspartic acid, asparagine, glutamic acid, glutamine, arginine, and no histidine was detected in the LMW soil peptides. The soil peptides released different amino acid percentages and quantities when hydrolyzed by immobilized proteases attached to different supports. The quanitities of amino acids released by batch hydrolysis differed from those obtained with column hydrolysis. Greater quantities of amino acids were released (by both types of immobilized protease) from the LMW peptide hydrolysates of the two cultivated soils than from the uncultivated soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowers LD (1986) Applications of immobilized biocatalysts in chemical analysis. Anal Chem 58:A513

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell P, Sanderson AR (1970) Preparation, properties and substrate exclusion effects of an insoluble pronase derivative. Biochem J 119:447–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel D, Steinberg IZ, Katchalski E (1971) Changes in conformation of insolubilized trypsin and chymotrypsin, followed by fluorescence. Biochem 10:4661

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SM, Thomas RL (1979) Activity of immobilized protease in the presence of montmorillonite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:1138–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay G, Lilly MD, Sharp AK, Wilson RJN (1968) Preparation and use of porous sheets with enzyme action. Nature (London) 217:641–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd JN (1978) Origin and range of enzymes in the soil. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, New York, pp 51–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd JN, Butler JHA (1975) Humus-enzyme systems and synthetic, organic polymer-enzyme analogues. In: Paul EA, McLaren AD (eds) Soil biochemistry. M. Dekker, New York, pp 143–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd JN, Jackson RB (1982) Biochemistry of ammonification. In: Stevenson FJ (ed) Nitrogen in agricultural soils. Agron Monogr 22, Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin, pp 173–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch J, Koelsch R, Kretschmer K (1978) Continuous production of protein hydrolysates in immobilized enzyme reactors. Acta Biotechnol 7:227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly MD, Sharp AK (1968) The kinetics of enzymes attached to waterinsoluble polymers. Chem Eng 215:12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren AD (1975) Soil as a system of humus and clay immobilized enzymes. Chem Scr 8:97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Melrose GJH (1971) Insolublized enzymes; biochemical applications of synthetic polymers. Rev Pure Appl Chem 21:83–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye EK, Chance B (1976) Investigation of the physical properties of immobilized enzymes. In: Mosbach K (ed) Immobilized enzymes. Methods of enzymology, Academic Press, New York, pp 357–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar J, Batistic L, Mayaudon J (1980) Hydrolases of the soil and their association with carbohydrates. Soil Biol Biochem 12:325–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Srere PA, Uyeda K (1976) Functional groups on enzymes suitable for binding to matricies. In: Mosbach K (ed) Immobilized enzymes. Methods of enzymology, Academic Press, New York, pp 11–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson FJ (1982) Humus chemistry. J Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Warman PR (1972) The use of an immobilized pronase for soil organic matter studies. MSc thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario

  • Warman PR, Bishop C (1985) The use of reverse-phase HPLC for soil amino-N analysis. J Liquid Chromatogr 8:2595–2606

    Google Scholar 

  • Warman PR, Bishop C (1987) Amino-N compounds found in soil organic matter hydrolysates of a loamy sand using an immobilized protease reactor column. Biol Fertil Soils 5:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Warman PR, Isnor RA (1989) Evidence of peptides in low-molecular-weight fractions of soil organic matter. Biol Fertil Soils 8:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Weetall HH (1985) Enzymes immobilized on organic supports. Trends Biotechnol 3:276–280

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warman, P.R., Isnor, R.A. Hydrolysis of low-molecular-weight soil peptides by immobilized proteases in column and batch reaction systems. Biol Fertil Soils 9, 335–340 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634111

Key words

Navigation