Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 599–617 | Cite as

Formal properties of natural language and linguistic theories

Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Natural Language Computational Linguistic Formal Property Linguistic Theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barton, G. Edward Jr., Robert C. Berwick, and Eric Sven Ristad: 1987,Computational Complexity and Natural Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, Noam: 1965,Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Publishers, Cinnaminson, NJ.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, Noam: 1986,Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins, and Use, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Embree, Emily: 1993, ‘The Morpheme ‘m9’ and the Dogon Genitive Construction’, Paper presented at the 24th Annual Conference on African Linguistics.Google Scholar
  6. Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey, K. Pullum, and Ivan A. Sag: 1985,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Greenberg, Joseph: 1963, ‘Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements’,Universals of Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 73–113.Google Scholar
  8. Hopcroft, John E. and Jeffrey D. Ullman: 1979,Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Addison and Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Joshi, Aravind K.: 1985, ‘Tree Adjoining Grammars: How Much Context-Sensitivity is Required to Provide Reasonable Structural Descriptions?’, in David R. Dowty, Lauri Kartunnen, and Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.),Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 206–250.Google Scholar
  10. Kervran, Marcel: 1982,Dictionnaire Dogon: Donno So, Région de Bandiagara, Paroisse Catholique, Bandiagara, Mali.Google Scholar
  11. Kornai, András and Geoffrey K. Pullum: 1990, ‘The X-Bar Theory of Phrase Structure’,Language 66(1), 24–50.Google Scholar
  12. Manaster-Ramer, Alexis: 1993, ‘Towards Transductive Linguistics’, in Karen Jensen, George E. Heidorn, and Stephen D. Richardson (eds.),Natural Language Processing: the PLNLP Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
  13. Pullum, Geoffrey K.: 1983, ‘How Many Possible Human Languages are There?’,Linguistic Inquiry 14(3), 447–467.Google Scholar
  14. Ristad, Eric Sven: 1986, ‘Defining Natural Language Grammars in GPSG’,24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of the Conference, pp. 40-44.Google Scholar
  15. Rounds, William C., Alexis Manaster-Ramer, and Joyce Friedman: 1957, ‘Finding Natural Languages a Home in Formal Language Theory’, in Alexis Manaster-Ramer (ed.),Mathematics of Language, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia, pp. 349–359.Google Scholar
  16. Rozenberg, Grzegorz: 1974, ‘Theory of L Systems: From the Point of View of Formal Language Theory’, in Grzegorz Rozenberg and Arto Salomaa (eds.),L Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  17. Salomaa, Arto: 1973,Formal Languages, Academic Press, Inc., Boston.Google Scholar
  18. Savitch, Walter J., Emmon Bach, William Marsh, and Gila Safran-Naveh: 1987,The Formal Complexity of Natural Language, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  19. Uszkoreit, Hans and Stanley Peters: 1986, ‘On Some Formal Properties of Metarules’, reprinted in Walter J. Savitch et al. (eds.), Linguistics and Philosophy, 227-250: 9(4), 477-494.Google Scholar
  20. Wasow, Thomas: 1978, ‘On Constraining the Class of Transformational Languages’,Synthese 39, 81–104. Reprinted in Walter J. Savich et al. 1987, 56-86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Culy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations